Skip to comments.
Giuliani, Evangelical Rift Grows Over Abortion
The Christian Post ^
| October 5, 2007
| Michelle Vu
Posted on 10/05/2007 4:24:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-218 next last
But the mainstream media keeps telling us that only Rudy can beat Hillary (snort!)
To: TitansAFC
seems like another good article for your ping list
2
posted on
10/05/2007 4:28:09 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But the mainstream media keeps telling us that only Rudy can beat Hillary (snort!) And whatever, pray tell, could be their reasoning???
Is it that they know that Hillary could beat Rudi hands down?
3
posted on
10/05/2007 4:29:36 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: maine-iac7
He wouldn’t even face her in the New York Senate race, why should we think he’ll beat her for the highest office in the land?
4
posted on
10/05/2007 4:31:59 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Winning the presidential election is vitally important, but not at the expense of what we hold most dear.
It appears that Dobson would rather see Hillary as president...and witness retreat in the jihad, a nuclear Iran, National Healthcare and no less than 3 Hillary appointed USSC Justices...than to vote for Rudy.
That's a man of principal, yessiree.
5
posted on
10/05/2007 4:33:22 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Gee... who could have predicted THAT?!
I mean, besides anyone who could rub two neurons together.
6
posted on
10/05/2007 4:34:16 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Republicans don’t want the evangelical vote unless evangelicals will shut up and have no opinion about anything.
7
posted on
10/05/2007 4:36:33 PM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Mariner
You seem to have no values...
8
posted on
10/05/2007 4:37:08 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: babygene
Why? Because if it came down to voting for Rudy or Hillary I’d gladly place a vote for Rudy?
9
posted on
10/05/2007 4:38:37 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I expect evangelicals to not sell the country down the river either.
10
posted on
10/05/2007 4:47:02 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(PUT AMERICA AHEAD! VOTE FOR FRED!!)
To: prairiebreeze
11
posted on
10/05/2007 4:50:58 PM PDT
by
avital2
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Giuliani, Evangelical Rift Grows Over Abortion”
Under no circumstances do I vote for that liberal.
12
posted on
10/05/2007 4:51:02 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(I'd be Catholic but I don't speak latin and don't wanna learn just to go to church.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
why should we think hell beat her for the highest office in the land? I’ve been saying that for years.
When her highness ran in 06, I was all for Rudy to jump in and kick some serious ass.
After all, all of his supporters keep saying that the only reason that he surrendered NY to the liberal trash is that he had prostrate cancer.
Well, there was his chance to redeem himself and prove his supporters right, once and for all, and receive the highest praise for knocking ms clinton into the footnotes of political history, but no.
Instead, he did nothing. - I believe that he read the tea leaves and feared that it might be him knocked into the footnotes, and therefore would not face her in his own state.
Now if Rudy cannot deliver NY for the GOP, then I am left with the assumption that he felt that he had a better chance on the National stage than in NY itself.
A poor omen indeed for those who want to actually win and not join the list of political has beens cluttering up the ranks of defeated politicians.
I lost all faith in Rudy in 06 and I will have to prepare to have to say "President Clinton" for another 8 years, if he is nominated.
13
posted on
10/05/2007 4:52:04 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
To: Mariner
“It appears that Dobson would rather see Hillary as president”
Or his values are just more important than which liberal occupies the oval office in 2008.
14
posted on
10/05/2007 4:52:26 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(I'd be Catholic but I don't speak latin and don't wanna learn just to go to church.)
To: prairiebreeze
15
posted on
10/05/2007 4:53:13 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(I'd be Catholic but I don't speak latin and don't wanna learn just to go to church.)
To: babygene; Mariner
I believe that no real practicing Catholic will vote for Giuliani. Period. I have faith that real practicing other Christians will refrain as well.
I hope the GOP is listening.
Of course, a truly prolife conservative must be on the correct side of the immigration debate as well to get our vote. If either of these stances are wrong, forget it.
16
posted on
10/05/2007 4:55:02 PM PDT
by
jobim
To: Mariner
I don’t know this for sure, but I suspect that Rudy is more pro-abortion than Hillary. Hillary’s position on abortion changed to pro-death when her husband ran for national office. Prior to that, it was pro life. To run as a democrat for national office, you must be pro abortion. It says little about her convictions except that she would sell her soul (if she has one).
Regarding the WOT, She would probably be the toughest. Reason be, she would be trying to prove that she had testicles. Otherwise (and you can bet she realizes it), she would be the LAST women elected president for the next 200 years.
That said, neither of them are suitable candidates. The primaries are important... Get behind the most suitable conservative candidate you can and squash Rudy.
17
posted on
10/05/2007 4:56:08 PM PDT
by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"
He wouldnt even face her in the New York Senate race, why should we think hell beat her for the highest office in the land?" You are so right, he handed her the Senate and it wouldn't surprise if he and his liberal wife were in this to assure a Hillary victory.
18
posted on
10/05/2007 4:56:25 PM PDT
by
mickie
(God Bless Our Troops)
To: Grunthor
“Under no circumstances do I vote for that liberal.”
You probably won’t have to. Rudy isn’t a done deal.
19
posted on
10/05/2007 4:57:21 PM PDT
by
daylilly
To: babygene
You seem to have no values... Actually, I can not see anyone that has any true conservative values ever being able to vote for any democrat, much less to the lineup of criminals, prima donnas and nut jobs the democratic party is fielding for their current Presidential offerings.
Hillary or Obama vs who? I do care who, but I will be damned before I will vote for anyone that has aligned themselves with America's flourishing communist party, the democrats.
I do not see any "republican crossover vote." It isn't happening. And that is a demonstration of personal values.
20
posted on
10/05/2007 4:58:00 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-218 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson