Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter on Dems' War Against Rush Limbaugh .....(exposes the Hillary Clinton connection)
Fox News ^ | Thursday, October 04, 2007

Posted on 10/04/2007 10:29:19 AM PDT by IrishMike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: bigfootbob

Ok, here it is Goober: “Standing up to the RAT party is what it is all about. Shamefully, all true americans should be taking the same sort of stand in the face of a RAT party corrupt and Unamerican beyond description.”


41 posted on 10/04/2007 12:11:13 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Hillery has already resurrected Sandy Berger as part of her campaign. Bet he can’t wait to get back to a position of authority where he can get revenge on the people who brought him down by reporting and investigating his criminal conduct.


42 posted on 10/04/2007 12:11:31 PM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
That, Sir, is a damned good point.

Of course you know that, being a leftist, Clark will excuse himself on the grounds that his violation of that code was done in the pursuit of a higher moral good; he’ll probably make a lame attempt to draw a parallel between his actions and those of Germans who lied to protect Jews in hiding during WWII. And, too, I’m sure he’d also throw out the threadbare leftist “applies to thee, but not to me” diatribe for good measure.

The more I watch and listen to these people on the left, the more sense Evan Sayet makes. If you didn’t read/hear it, at the time, check back on this thread and consume the linked material from the Heritage Foundation website.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1806173/posts

43 posted on 10/04/2007 12:30:18 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Nine out of ten orcs attacking Rohan were Saruman's Uruk-hai, not Sauron's! So, why invade Mordor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RedEyeJack
Hillery has already resurrected Sandy Berger as part of her campaign. Bet he can’t wait to get back to a position of authority where he can get revenge on the people who brought him down by reporting and investigating his criminal conduct.

And I bet he's out buying new socks as we speak.
44 posted on 10/04/2007 12:31:38 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: CT
Wesley Clark has to be a pretty poor military man...

You could have stopped right there! As Rush said, he's a moron!!!!!!

46 posted on 10/04/2007 1:04:58 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Officially Fredbacker1 but don't know how to change my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

BUMP


47 posted on 10/04/2007 1:08:15 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

My Dear Fellow Americans:

For the last few weeks, the “Liberal’s War on America” has gone badly.

* MoveOn, the New York Times, and Senators who accused Gen. Petraeus of being a traitor and a liar have been exposed and repudiated;
* The media’s attempted flim-flam to portray Iran’s Terrorist Dictator as a “Statesman,” tripped on Columbia University’s red carpet;

* The brave combat Marines whom Congressman Murtha and the press eagerly charged with “cold-blooded murders” in Iraq are being found innocent, acquitted one by one.

The “War” is not going well ... the “War On America,” that is.

Those who claim they “Support the Troops” are finally being unmasked, shown for being the cowards they are. But, it won’t be long before they regroup, begin their own “Surge” in this decades-long “War On America.” We won’t stand by quietly when they do; nor, should you.

My fellow POWs and I have long known the contempt the extreme Left has for our military. We felt the crush of rifle butts in our faces, beatings and unspeakable torture in the Hanoi Hilton Prison when we refused to kowtow to American traitors who traveled to these countries for propaganda “photo-ops” with our Communist jailors.

The so-called “anti-war movement,” lead by the likes of Lt. John Kerry and his mentor, Sen. Ted Kennedy, also said they “supported the troops”. What they didn’t say is whose “troops.”

We knew the answer then, we were witnesses and victims. It’s the same today. They “support” America’s enemies, any Communist Regime, Dictator or Terrorists that vow to kill and maim American soldiers and innocent civilians.

American soldiers in Vietnam were falsely accused of being a “barbarian horde,” “rapists,” “murderers,” “drug addicts” and “baby killers.”

Today, their sons, daughters and grandchildren serving in uniform stand accused of being “terrorists,” “Nazis,” “cold-blooded murderers,” people who wantonly conduct “air raids on villages” bombing and killing civilians.

Every one of those spurious accusations were spewed from the Halls of Congress, most often by the same men and women who voted to send America’s youth to war, only to denounce, vilify and abandon them later, when the opportunity for personal, political advantage presented itself.

When I and my fellow veterans — POWs, Soldiers, Airmen, Marines and Navy Swift Boat combat veterans alike — attempted to warn America about one of the most notorious turncoats from the Vietnam era, we were initially ignored by the mainstream media.

When the press and TV networks could no longer cover-up for John Kerry’s very public treasonous conduct, we were accused of being “serial liars,” shouted down by Leftist political campaign operatives disguised as “journalists.” All the while the networks kept the film evidence of Lt. Kerry’s betrayal under lock and key, where it remains hidden from the American public even today.

The recent treatment accorded Gen. Petraeus by the same radicals in Congress and the media was strikingly similar to our experiences in 2004. Before he uttered a single word, this highly decorated combat veteran, a man of great honor who has risked his life many times in the defense of our country, stood accused, disparaged and berated by a pack of power-hungry shirkers and slackers unworthy to polish his combat medals. Contribute

Veterans who attempted to expose Sen. Kerry in 2004 were treated no better. But, Kerry and his band of Leftist comrades had something special in store for me and my fellow POWs and their wives. We were sued repeatedly for three long years, forced to spend $1 million just to defend ourselves in several frivolous lawsuits.

What did we do to cause such a prolonged, vindictive assault? We told the truth no Mainstream Media news operation wanted the American public to know, then or now.

Dozens of my fellow POWs and their wives participated in a documentary, “Stolen Honor: Wounds that Never Heal.” In that film we said Kerry and his anti-war followers were liars and frauds working on behalf of our brutal Communists captors. Their collaboration with the enemy prolonged our captivity and the Vietnam War itself by years. Their vicious lies accusing us and all U.S. servicemen of being “war criminals” put our lives and the lives of Americans still fighting on the battlefield in grave danger.

Worse of all, Kerry’s self-aggrandizing, false accusations against American soldiers who had born the brunt of the bleeding and dying in Vietnam, spawned the myths our young men and women in Iraq today are forced to defend against, even as they fight for their lives on the battlefield each and every day.

You can draw a straight line from the deceitful Leftist tactics used to bring America’s defeat and dishonor in Vietnam to Iraq today.

America’s military didn’t lose the Vietnam War. Congress declared defeat, voted to abandon South Vietnam nearly two years after our last combat troops left. That sell-out, not only of our South Vietnam ally, but the nearly 60,000 Americans who gave their lives on the battlefield, ignited a genocidal holocaust throughout Southeast Asia that can still only be measured in the millions, an estimated three to five million innocent civilians brutally murdered.

We cannot let that happen again. We will not let that happen. You can stand shoulder to shoulder with us to prevent that from happening.

Three years ago, I and my fellow POWs and Vietnam combat veterans created a non-profit organization, “The Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation”. Our mission was simple, to set the record straight about the Vietnam War and those who served and fought there. Little did we know then we’d be slapped with multiple lawsuits for daring to uncover the layer upon layer of lies that constitute the false Vietnam History.

Nor, could we know then the Left’s plans to use the same Vietnam blueprint for defeat in Iraq. Little wonder Kerry and his followers wanted to sue us into silence! But, we prevailed. We successfully defended against each of those lawsuits, all have now been withdrawn. And, we will not remain silent any longer.

Our research into the Vietnam War, most especially, those individuals and organizations responsible for creating the completely false history of Vietnam, is voluminous, factual and compelling. We have amassed a virtual library of records, documents and eyewitness testimony that proves, conclusively, the popular history of Vietnam is pure bunk, propaganda.

But, to show that, to prove that and to reach the widest public audience with our findings, we need your help. Three years of litigation and research has put us deeply in debt, $250,000 in legal fees alone. We do not have MoveOn.Org’s deep pockets, nor will we get a discount from The New York Times.

Anything you can afford to help us complete our mission, to set the record straight about Vietnam and, now, Iraq, is desperately needed and greatly appreciated. But, time is running short.

Once we get the truth out to the American people, there will be winners. Those winners will be every man and woman who has served in our Armed Forces. To them and their families, this is a war we cannot lose.

The “War On America” is just heating up again. What we do now will dictate America’s future, whether it is one of victory over terrorism, or, decades more of defeat, humiliation in a lost, but noble cause.

God Bless You and America,

Col. Bud Day

http://www.vvlf.org/default.php?page_id=30


48 posted on 10/04/2007 1:09:57 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phatboy
This just up on Drudge:

Elizabeth questions Limbaugh's draft deferment
49 posted on 10/04/2007 1:23:03 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Ahem...

That's 99 pounds.

**99 Pounds of Dynamite: COULTER'S NEW BOOK Hannity & Colmes** in her own words...

Not that you are not spot on!

Hiya Leni

:> )

50 posted on 10/04/2007 1:29:21 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

"how'd I get dragged into this?"

51 posted on 10/04/2007 1:31:27 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“What the hell are your Senate doing, censuring a private citizen for something he didn’t say?”

They are engaging in what they like to call “McCarthyism”. And they are doing it to shut up conservatives.


52 posted on 10/04/2007 1:44:21 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Get Reid and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Sandy Berger should never get his security clearance back, and should never occupy a position of public trust again. And that includes dog catcher.


53 posted on 10/04/2007 1:48:56 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Get Reid and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Hey, Syncro......long time no sea.

My best,

Bahama Mama

54 posted on 10/04/2007 2:12:53 PM PDT by MinuteGal ("I don't believe anything MoveOn.org or Rush Limbaugh says" (Geraldo Rivera))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Lately, with the liberals gone wild: 12% approval of congress; the Limbaugh misquote hoopla; NY Gov. Spitzer giving drivers license to illegals; etc.

Conspicuously absent is Hillary.

Remember the talk of “redeployment”, up, down, over.

In the macro sense, the Democrats are loudly redeploying left of a quiet Hillary. TO POSITION HILLARY AS A MODERATE. Some of these Democrats are just simple lemmings. Some like NY Gov. Spitzer, I’m sure, will have negotiated a future reward.

These useful idiots will appease the base, Hillary will step on their backs for the presidency -such will serve the greater good.

There are real costs for democrats, but not for their star. For her it distracts critics.


55 posted on 10/04/2007 7:29:11 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
From Rush's website, about the Mad Bomber of Bosnia:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!! I originally was furious at all this, but now I'm really looking forward to the demoncrats' digging themselves a hole deeper and deeper and deeper! :-) Or maybe the 'give'em enough rope and they'll hang themselves' is a much better analogy, LOL! :-)
56 posted on 10/04/2007 8:47:14 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud RUSH REPUBLICAN! WIN, FRED, WIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CT
But on this Limbaugh thing, Clark isn’t studying his briefings very well. He as clueless as Jerry Rivers.
...............................................

Jerry Rivers looking dumbest was the Capone ‘tomb’
and at his most dangerous -
mapping military positions in a combat zone, in the sand.....on live TV

57 posted on 10/05/2007 3:11:24 AM PDT by IrishMike (Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Rush reading three DBM articles today about the Dems’ doubts, fears and the “inevitability” about Mrs. Clinton.

.................................................

I heard him, I was driving home about that time.
He was good yesterday, very good.


58 posted on 10/05/2007 3:14:34 AM PDT by IrishMike (Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike; All
For those who missed Rush yesterday, he did an excellent segment on the "not so inevitable" Madame President:

Rush: The dirty little secret, though, that nobody's talking about is a Celinda Lake poll. She's half of the Battleground poll, and they are very worried. There are 31 swing congressional districts out there where she doesn't run well. She might win the state that those districts are in, but she might be a drag on a Democrat incumbent in that district, and there are 31 of them. That's a significant number. The Democrats are very worried about that. In addition, there are some candidates in the Democrat Party who are telling the DNC, "Don't send her to campaign. I don't want to run with her, coming out and campaign for her." Her negatives are sky high. For somebody who's inevitably going to be the next president, 49%, she is, as Karl Rove said, fatally flawed. Yet the conventional wisdom is, just get these Democrat primaries over, cancel 'em, put Mrs. Clinton as the nominee right now, let's save everybody some money because she's the next president anyway. It ain't the case.

Let's go back to one of the previous stories, and that is the white male vote. Okay, you have the white male vote, Democrats have lost it, a majority for quite a few years. You have the Democrats all concerned about whether people are going to vote for Hillary, women, blacks, will they vote for a woman president or a black president and so forth. They are worried about this stuff and you contrast this with this era of inevitability we seem to be in where Mrs. Clinton is already anointed as the nominee and practically anointed as the president in 2008. Now, on this business about white southern males abandoning the Democrat Party, this is why it is important, ladies and gentlemen, to continue to characterize Mrs. Clinton as a woman that reminds you of your first wife, maybe your first and second wives, Nurse Ratched or what have you. Point is, let's 'em focus on their race and their female issues and whether people will vote for a black or a woman, because I don't think there's any doubt on. I think it's about policy and issues. It always is. This is what the Democrats don't get because they can't be honest about their policies. They can't be honest about their issues. They would die politically if they ever told anybody what their real plans are. So they get distracted and all this other stuff. The real question is whether or not the people of this country in 2008 want to elect a socialist president who will install a socialist government.

Democrats Aren't Majority Party, and Mrs. Clinton Is Not Inevitable
59 posted on 10/05/2007 4:54:22 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

I like to deal with rightists. They say what they really think—not like the leftists, who say one thing and mean another.
— Mao Tse-tung


60 posted on 10/05/2007 4:56:29 AM PDT by IrishMike (Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson