Skip to comments.
Presidential hopeful Fred Thompson proposes compromise on gay marriage
Pinknews ^
| 10/3/07
| staff
Posted on 10/03/2007 6:09:04 AM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
"The Republican Presidential hopeful Fred Thompson, who is considered "progressive" on gay rights..."
Uh, Fredheads, you might want to correct these folks. If the PinkNews thinks Fred is progressive, that ain't gonna help
1
posted on
10/03/2007 6:09:05 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: pissant
The Republican Presidential hopeful Fred Thompson, who is considered "progressive" on gay rights Why do you continue to post this utter crap. Just because your candidate is at 0.00001% in the polls? Fred is a federalist who strongly believes in states rights. That is very conservative. Gee, imagine that, someone who believes in the Constitution.
To: Always Right
Hey, I don’t think he is all that progressive on gay rights, but the pinkos apparently do. Might want to nip it in the bud.
3
posted on
10/03/2007 6:13:22 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
Might want to nip it in the bud.If it fools any gay people, why would we want to?
To: pissant
Fred seems to have a penchant for sticking his foot in it.
5
posted on
10/03/2007 6:16:49 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: pissant
Hey, I dont think he is all that progressive on gay rights No, that is why they put it in quotes. They were poking fun at conservatives who are criticizing him. I imagine you just ran across this site in your normal reading?
To: pissant
I think once the source is considered, and the motives there of, it will all work out...
7
posted on
10/03/2007 6:20:24 AM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: pissant
The problem with making gay marriage a state issue is that the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Constitution will be used to force states who do not choose to recognize gay marriage to recognize gay marriages performed in other states.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
8
posted on
10/03/2007 6:28:04 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: pissant
In this case, notwithstanding the mis-use of "progressive" in this article to slant it, Fred is correct in that we don't need no stinkin' Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
We need to remove the ability of Judges to make law that doesn't exist.
Fred recommends that States can make their own laws, a true State's Rights issue, and stop legislating from the bench.
Amending the Constitution every time some ACLU-loving activist Judge commands something is NOT the way to go.
For the DuncanDonuts here, attacking on this issue is really weak.
Duncan Who?
9
posted on
10/03/2007 6:30:00 AM PDT
by
traditional1
( Fred Thompson-The ONLY electable Republican Candidate)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s my issue as well. But the clause doesn’t seem to impact CCW laws.
10
posted on
10/03/2007 6:30:46 AM PDT
by
rintense
(I'm 4 Thompson!)
To: Brilliant
Fred seems to have a penchant for sticking his foot in it. Yeah, it's that damn federalist streak he's been so consistent with that gets him every time. < /sarcasm off
11
posted on
10/03/2007 6:31:04 AM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(ManBearPig '08)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The problem with making gay marriage a state issue is that the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Constitution will be used to force states who do not choose to recognize gay marriage to recognize gay marriages performed in other states. I think you meant the "Full Faith and Credit" Clause.
12
posted on
10/03/2007 6:33:09 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
To: pissant
Danm! and here I had just about convinced myself he was OK even with CFR and all.
13
posted on
10/03/2007 6:33:26 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
To: Always Right
Fred will dissapoint conservatives.
To: Brilliant
Actually, Fred is a very honest and forthright speaker. He meant what he said. No foot in anything here.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Fred’s proposal would protect a state from having to recognize a “gay marriage” from another state. That was clearly stated in previously posted articles on this subject.
16
posted on
10/03/2007 6:40:32 AM PDT
by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: traditional1
You watch, when Fred changes his tune, and says he’ll support a amendment banning gay marriage, you Fredheads will oooh and aahh over his courage. It’ll be just another flip flop to the rest of us.
17
posted on
10/03/2007 6:43:07 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Coldwater Creek
Fred will disappoint some so-called conservatives.
Federalism is at the very core of constitutional government. Many so-called conservatives have forgotten or deliberately ignored that fact. They are hell-bent for election and willing to turn our form of government inside out in pursuit of their desired outcomes. Let's take abortion for instance. The US Constitution doesn't say a damn thing about it, and there is no way you can reasonably twist the 14th Amendment to extend personhood to a being which doesn't have citizenship and can't be counted in a census. Ditto on the ginned up Terri Schiavo "controversy." It ain't the Federal government's business to deal with these issues. And so on.
18
posted on
10/03/2007 6:45:54 AM PDT
by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules)
To: RKV
NO! Fred has been one of my senator’s. There is no one that is more social or fiscal conservative than I am. Fred will disappoint!
To: Coldwater Creek
20
posted on
10/03/2007 6:56:16 AM PDT
by
Abcdefg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson