[traditional1]

In this case, notwithstanding the mis-use of "progressive" in this article to slant it, Fred is correct in that we don't need no stinkin' Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.

We need to remove the ability of Judges to make law that doesn't exist.

Fred recommends that States can make their own laws, a true State's Rights issue, and stop legislating from the bench.

Amending the Constitution every time some ACLU-loving activist Judge commands something is NOT the way to go.

For the DuncanDonuts here, attacking on this issue is really weak.

Duncan Who?

[pissant]

You watch, when Fred changes his tune, and says he’ll support a amendment banning gay marriage, you Fredheads will oooh and aahh over his courage. It’ll be just another flip flop to the rest of us.

[ichabod1]

THe only issue out there that, in my opinion, is worthy of a constitutional amendment is a cradle-to-grave Right To Life amendment. OK, maybe there are some others, but I Don’t think this one is it. Maybe one to repeal the Full Faith and Credit clause itself?