To: E. Pluribus Unum
Fred’s proposal would protect a state from having to recognize a “gay marriage” from another state. That was clearly stated in previously posted articles on this subject.
16 posted on
10/03/2007 6:40:32 AM PDT by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: FormerLib
Fred’s proposal would protect a state from having to recognize a “gay marriage” from another state. It doesn't affect me either way so I personally couldn't care less how homosexuals envision life, liberty and happiness or how the government regulates it.
But under this arrangement wouldn't the Federal government have to recognize the marriage regardless of where the people reside?
22 posted on
10/03/2007 7:02:56 AM PDT by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: FormerLib
Fred’s proposal would protect a state from having to recognize a “gay marriage” from another state. That was clearly stated in previously posted articles on this subject. I guess I didn't read those. Thanks for clearing it up.
30 posted on
10/03/2007 7:16:44 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson