BS. If the founders had known that abortion would rear its ugly head, they would have banned it. If you don’t understand that a unborn child is a human being, than you can make your weak argument.
And this notion that it’s consistent with federalism to have constitutional amendments for term limits, for balanced budgets and for disallowing the “full faith and credit” clause, but that it is against federalism for an amendment to protect the unborn is ridiculous.
What sucks is the short-sightedness of the conservatives - especially folks like Dobson (whom I respect as well).
Federalism and limited government WILL “impose” morality on people,
simply because the alleviation of the consequences for immoral behavior is removed from the taxpayer and put back on the individual choosing the behavior.
This is why our Constitution “worked” for so long. Moral behavior is simply rational behavior when you have to experience the consequences for immoral behavior.
Thanks RKV,
You’ve correctly made the case for Federalism. It is a philosophy that will require people to take more personal accountability for their local governments and local societies. Thompson has been with few exceptions remarkably consistent on this point and it is good to see that he remains consistent on Federalism despite the opportunity to pander to people who should know better.
If the federal government can dictate isses that are not in the constitution, then they can dictate all sorts of other reprehensible policies to the states.. this is essentially the problem we have today.