1 posted on
09/14/2007 6:05:30 PM PDT by
indcons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: indcons
36 posted on
09/14/2007 6:29:15 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: indcons
Newt presumes Clinton will win the nomination.
I do not believe this is pre-ordained. But let's assume it to be true for the sake of argument.
At some point, Clinton's scandals will be used as ammo by her Democrat opponents. The latest finance scandal, where $25k of illegal contributions suddenly became over $800k is a case in point.
Those negatives will weaken her. Plus, once the Republican nominee starts hitting on the same issues, Clinton will end up being hammered on scandals for a year straight.
I for one do not believe Clinton is as strong of a national candidate as some assume. Especially if the campaign is close, and Clinton has to do a lot of last minute stumping, her shrill voice is unlikely to convert voters.
The Nutroots can't stand her, and may stay home if she gets the nomination.
As in the past, Ohio and Florida are in effect, the election.
Oh, and G.W. Bush is not running.
38 posted on
09/14/2007 6:29:28 PM PDT by
magellan
To: indcons
I wonder if Newt’s negative ratings are higher than Clinton’s.
40 posted on
09/14/2007 6:31:36 PM PDT by
Fitzcarraldo
(Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
To: indcons
Sometimes I think that Newt is the smartest guy around, and other times I think that he’s an ass. He is great at finding fault and disparaging Republican candidates. Why doesn’t he turn that ability toward the Dems for a change? Maybe he should look at his own personal flaws before attacking others.
42 posted on
09/14/2007 6:33:05 PM PDT by
Ferox
To: indcons
You know, Newt, just because you HAVE an opinion, doesn't mean you have to share it.
With friends like him, who needs enemas, I mean enemies! ;o)
43 posted on
09/14/2007 6:33:15 PM PDT by
SuziQ
To: indcons
44 posted on
09/14/2007 6:33:19 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: indcons
....I have to agree with him.
What do we want in ‘08? A North Eastern Liberal who will let in illegals, give our healthcare to government and raise taxes as high as they can or Hillary Clinton?
What a choice. :(:(:(
50 posted on
09/14/2007 6:36:43 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: indcons
Newt sure loves hillary. What’s the deal, newt? Think you’re gonna get some?
To: indcons
Well that’s it! we’re all doomed! Hey Newt go yourself you surrender weasel. You’re a suck up to the rat.
55 posted on
09/14/2007 6:41:56 PM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Union work: comparable value for twice the price.)
To: indcons
The Clinton machine will destroy everything in the way. Women President with real blackness, a friend to Wall Street and gay people...a true leader. She has tried to fix healthcare already.
She will help you with your healthcare bills, your student loans and your mortgage. She will probably save the planet from Global Warming and negotiate with Bin Laden. This is a can't miss.
57 posted on
09/14/2007 6:42:37 PM PDT by
alrea
To: indcons; All
“Gingrich Thinks No Candidate a Match For the Clinton Machine”
... Except for himself, of course.
Newt, you are smart and concise but you come off as a wise-ass.
You are as bad as ME!
Love ya, mean it.
69 posted on
09/14/2007 7:25:11 PM PDT by
Mr. Jazzy
(Very Proud Dad of LCpl Smoothguy242 USMC of 1/3 Marines, now fighting for freedom, on duty in Iraq.)
To: indcons
Nothing like a positive upbeat inspirational message to get the masses excited. Why doesn't Newt just pass out free razor blades and a noose to Republicans?
We are DOOMED. Evidently
To: indcons
The GOP has alienated a substantial portion of their base. This has to be addressed. It cannot be ignored.
With respect to Hillary. The percentage of people who dislike Hillary is so high that it would be historically significant were she to overcome it. She got elected, in a state she didn’t even really live in and only because she was Bill’s wife and her opponent fell ill. Aside from that what are her qualifications?
77 posted on
09/14/2007 7:46:17 PM PDT by
Aglooka
To: indcons
I pretty much agree, the Republicans will be crushed. They won’t even know what hit them. I’m thinking they lose to Hillary, they lose 10 seats in the Senate and 50 seats in the House.
80 posted on
09/14/2007 7:48:23 PM PDT by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: indcons
Well, Newt, you did such a great job of bringing into fruition the “Contract with America”.
82 posted on
09/14/2007 7:49:58 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: indcons
One more time, Newt needs to “SHUT UP”!
85 posted on
09/14/2007 8:01:43 PM PDT by
Paige
("Facts are stubborn things." President Ronald Reagan)
To: indcons
Nothing can overcome the power of Hilary’s cleavage.
86 posted on
09/14/2007 8:06:33 PM PDT by
isrul
To: indcons
88 posted on
09/14/2007 8:10:47 PM PDT by
potlatch
(MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
To: indcons
91 posted on
09/14/2007 8:15:39 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(I'm With Fred)
To: indcons
Sorry newt I don’t agree with you.
You complain about Republicans being divided but you words mean something to many conservatives.
However, if you decide to run you can not win the presidency due to many factors.
95 posted on
09/14/2007 8:18:21 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson