1 posted on
09/13/2007 6:54:32 AM PDT by
presidio9
To: presidio9
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ......................
To: presidio9
"There's a big difference in paying a lot of lip service to supporting the Constitution and actually going out and supporting it with your vote," ...
lol.... So, all the excuses for Paul's votes, pork, and positions that aren't Constitutional aren't lip service.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Ron Paul is a political Rorschach test. People don't really want to vote for Ron Paul, they want to vote for themselves, that is why debate about Paul's positions is really just people projecting what they believe..
Yes, that even goes for me.. I don't trust establishment government types who require more time explaining away their actions, so when I see someone that requires so much explanation of why they made votes that, for anyone else, would brand them a RINO, my distrust wall goes up.
IMHO, Ron Paul isn't a revolution, he is the establishment who is there to make anti-establishment types believe they are represented.
3 posted on
09/13/2007 7:00:47 AM PDT by
mnehring
(Baby delivered at Ron Paul rally? Watch for it. You heard it here first.)
To: presidio9
I keep hearing he’s a big rough, tough Texan. Seems like that was a lie too.
6 posted on
09/13/2007 7:10:02 AM PDT by
Hazcat
(We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
To: presidio9
"It (honest investigation of 9/11 truth) will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge" Ron Paul - Traitor Park Right Trash
|
|
|
To: presidio9
9 posted on
09/13/2007 7:16:15 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Union work: comparable value for twice the price.)
To: presidio9
‘During his years in the House, Paul has been on more than his share of losing 434-1 votes, thanks largely to his habit of opposing any measure not specifically allowed for by the Constitution. ‘
Basically, he’s a cranky contrarian, and his followers mistake it for ‘creativity’. Its not.
Ron Paul has never once demonstrated any ‘eroding of civil rights’ although he talks about it as though its ‘real’ in every speech. He cannot cite a single instance as related to the Patriot Act, for example. He can’t name a single US citizen thats been ‘victimized’ in such a fashion by the Federal Government.
He’s all hat and no cattle.
16 posted on
09/13/2007 7:26:11 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: presidio9
HEP ME RON PAUL, HEP ME, HEP ME!
![](http://www.middle-east-online.com/pictures/big/_22106_Pink_women.jpg)
21 posted on
09/13/2007 7:43:18 AM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW!)
To: presidio9; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...
ping for a long interesting article.
To: All
Is Ron Paul being used by George Soros’ MoveOn.org? Do they want him to do well enough, so that he will run 3rd party, and help the Dems win?
28 posted on
09/13/2007 8:05:06 AM PDT by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter: pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
To: presidio9
Ron Paul,
Earmark King! Earmarks don't increase spending and having IOUs in the Social Security Trust Fund is just as good as having money there too.
32 posted on
09/13/2007 8:10:49 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(James Hansen; Scott Thomas Beauchamp with a PhD)
To: presidio9
Being pro Constitution and pro capitalism is good. But Paul needs to understand the nature of Islam (to expand thru the use of force)and to understand the purpose of government (to protect its citizens from the threat of force and to protect the rights of citizens from internal and external threats). He also needs to stop ignoring facts of reality and dropping context and realize that Muslim aggression has been occurring for 1300 years and is not going to stop just because we are nice to them.
39 posted on
09/13/2007 8:20:18 AM PDT by
mjp
(Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck.)
To: presidio9
"We're just printing money out of thin air, and that's strictly prohibited by the Constitution," Paul says. Proving once again that Ron Paul's Constitution is an imaginary document completely unrelated to the actual US Constitution adopted by the Framers at the Philadelphia Convention.
58 posted on
09/13/2007 9:35:03 AM PDT by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
But it's clear how Paul would vote on the matter if he were a state legislator: "The fetus is clearly a life," he said. "If you harm or injure a fetus you can be charged with a crime in this country under state laws. Abortion is the same thing." TIME TO EAT CROW!!
66 posted on
09/13/2007 9:48:17 AM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Coming soon: Stupidparty.com = Republican Party news, opinions, and blogs)
To: presidio9
68 posted on
09/13/2007 9:49:04 AM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Coming soon: Stupidparty.com = Republican Party news, opinions, and blogs)
To: presidio9
Whenever our leaders tell us there's going to be a declaration of war, you'd better look out because that usually means it's going to be a declaration of war against our liberties.What an idiot.
80 posted on
09/13/2007 10:36:03 AM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: presidio9
An interesting thing happened to me last night. I had just gotten a car running that had been locked away in the garage for seversal weeks and was driving along the freeway. Since I wasn’t completely certain it was in top running order, I kept to the right and just tried to stay out of the way. As cars drove past me on my left though, a number of them honked their horns and waved. Since they all seemed to be smiling I surmised it wasn’t anything bad, so I continued on my way. When I finally got the chance I had my wife check out my rear lights, thinking some or all of them might be out. She reported that they were all in good shape and my “Ron Paul for President” bumper sticker was what was causing all the excitement. Evidently there are more of us than we thought.
90 posted on
09/13/2007 1:25:51 PM PDT by
oldfart
(The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
To: presidio9
"I like him because he's the most anti-Bush Republican running. He's bashing the Republicans more than the Democrats are. He's showing that he's a Republican in party registration only." Not exactly the best way to win a Republican primary ...
92 posted on
09/13/2007 1:29:39 PM PDT by
x
To: presidio9
95 posted on
09/13/2007 1:34:25 PM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
To: presidio9
“Whenever our leaders tell us there’s going to be a declaration of war, you’d better look out because that usually means it’s going to be a declaration of war against our liberties.””
Nations cannot survive with men like this in power. They’d fiddle while Rome burned, and just say “the market will take care of it”.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson