To: presidio9
"There's a big difference in paying a lot of lip service to supporting the Constitution and actually going out and supporting it with your vote," ...
lol.... So, all the excuses for Paul's votes, pork, and positions that aren't Constitutional aren't lip service.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Ron Paul is a political Rorschach test. People don't really want to vote for Ron Paul, they want to vote for themselves, that is why debate about Paul's positions is really just people projecting what they believe..
Yes, that even goes for me.. I don't trust establishment government types who require more time explaining away their actions, so when I see someone that requires so much explanation of why they made votes that, for anyone else, would brand them a RINO, my distrust wall goes up.
IMHO, Ron Paul isn't a revolution, he is the establishment who is there to make anti-establishment types believe they are represented.
3 posted on
09/13/2007 7:00:47 AM PDT by
mnehring
(Baby delivered at Ron Paul rally? Watch for it. You heard it here first.)
To: mnehrling
So, in other words, Ron Paul really isn’t libertarian enough for your taste. Is that correct?
4 posted on
09/13/2007 7:02:30 AM PDT by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: mnehrling
Please provide a single example votes by Ron Paul in favor if a bill that has pork in it.
To: mnehrling
HUSH FOOLISH NAIVE!
THE PAULINATI HAVE SPOKEN!!!!
20 posted on
09/13/2007 7:42:01 AM PDT by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson