oh, the horror.
The ACLU later filed a public records request with the sheriff's department, seeking a policy statement for religious clothing for the incarcerated, but were told there was no document, said Hector Villagra, director of the ACLU's Orange County office. Villagra said he found that "astonishing" since the U.S. Department of Justice has a policy that allows Muslim women to have three hijabs while in custody.
1 posted on
09/05/2007 5:52:54 AM PDT by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: jdm
2 posted on
09/05/2007 5:55:03 AM PDT by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: jdm
Is a Muslim woman allowed to sue a man?
3 posted on
09/05/2007 5:55:08 AM PDT by
Stark_GOP
To: jdm
She wasn’t too modest to commit the crime she was on probation for, nor was she too to violate that probation either.
5 posted on
09/05/2007 5:56:10 AM PDT by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: jdm
Kinda hard to take that mug shot with the burka on, babe.
6 posted on
09/05/2007 5:56:11 AM PDT by
SpinnerWebb
(Islam... if ya can't join 'em, beat 'em.)
To: jdm
Sorry,sweetie....US law trumps any and all commands that that pig fornicator that you follow might have issued.Don’t like it? Go back to Lebanon....and leave your US passport at the airport as you leave.
7 posted on
09/05/2007 5:56:11 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
To: jdm
Jeez, I’m glad I don’t belong to a religion that tells me who can and can’t look at me.
8 posted on
09/05/2007 5:57:01 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
To: jdm
America is an open society. If you are not open to America then get the hell out and go back to where you came from.
To: jdm
Like this has got a chance.
Oh, wait. It's California.
10 posted on
09/05/2007 5:57:35 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(I wasn't able to vote against Hitler, but I can vote NO on Hillary!)
To: jdm
He most likely told her to put it back on quick.
12 posted on
09/05/2007 5:59:13 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: jdm
The couple had pleaded guilty in June 2006 to a misdemeanor violation of welfare fraud Does her religion say anything against welfare fraud? /s
13 posted on
09/05/2007 5:59:15 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("We control this House, not the parliamentarians!” -Congressman Steny Hoyer (D))
To: jdm
The ACLU later filed a public records request with the sheriff's department, seeking a policy statement for religious clothing for the incarceratedWould this not violate the "Liberal Creed" of SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE?
The ACLU seems to be searching for that which they protest............
14 posted on
09/05/2007 5:59:17 AM PDT by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: jdm
Khatib was seen by deputies and other men from her mosque without her covering, causing her extreme emotional distress
9/11 Welfare fraud and probation violators cause me emotional distress maybe I should sue her.
15 posted on
09/05/2007 5:59:23 AM PDT by
grjr21
To: jdm
To: jdm
Whenever a Christian wants to do something of a religious nature, the ACLU comes down on the Christian on the basis of Separation of Church and State. But if the police follow standard practices in dealing with a Muslim, the ACLU comes down on the police for religious persecution.
Anti-Christian Lawyers Union.
17 posted on
09/05/2007 6:00:55 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: jdm
“to have her head uncovered in public particularly in the presence of men who are not part of her immediate family is a serious breach of faith and a deeply humiliating and defiling experience”
but thats only a breach of outdated practice.
To: jdm
I have trouble understanding the perspective of someone who thinks they can get away with hiding their identity after they’ve been convicted of a crime and after they’ve been re-arrested for violating their probation for said crime.
That’s one interesting mindset.
To: jdm
to have her head uncovered in public particularly in the presence of men who are not part of her immediate family is a serious breach of faith So, shouldn't she be stoned?
To: jdm
22 posted on
09/05/2007 6:02:07 AM PDT by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: jdm
"The couple had pleaded guilty in June 2006 to a misdemeanor violation of welfare fraud.."
Well, doesn't this just frost the cake!
Hey B!tch, take yer freakin burka and stuff up something. You should have been deported.
You don't like our laws? GTFO
24 posted on
09/05/2007 6:02:37 AM PDT by
Al Gator
(Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
To: jdm
All are equal under the law.
25 posted on
09/05/2007 6:02:43 AM PDT by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson