1 posted on
08/26/2007 4:21:05 AM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Kaslin
Liberals pander to perverts. Their presidential candidates showed up a gay themed "debate" no one watched to out-do each other in their support for the pervert agenda. Trust me, the last they thing they are is family values folks.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
08/26/2007 4:26:10 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Kaslin
‘Thought’ crimes versus physical crimes?
Why is it that so-called Conservatives so often undermine our entire political belief system with such nonsense?
Conservatives believe in personal freedom and personal responsibility.
Depriving someone else of same is a crime.
There is no equivalence between standing under a platform hoping to catch a glimpse of panties or less, and the killing of a child.
Completely and utterly ridiculous.
3 posted on
08/26/2007 4:29:28 AM PDT by
Stallone
(Free Republic - The largest collection of volunteer Freedom Fighters the world has ever known)
To: Kaslin
They had a great time slamming Catholic priests but overlook the daily reports of sexual abuse of children by government teachers.
5 posted on
08/26/2007 4:38:28 AM PDT by
wintertime
(Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
To: Kaslin
6 posted on
08/26/2007 4:44:56 AM PDT by
sure_fine
( • not one to over kill the thought process)
To: Kaslin
This is a very badly-worded law. I would absolutely be in favor of a law preventing peeping, but the way this thing was written, it becomes an unenforceable thought-crime-style law. I was about to blast Stallone for defending peeping, then I read the article closer -- and this law is a huge pile of CRAP.
The ACLU is right on this one.
8 posted on
08/26/2007 4:59:36 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: Kaslin
Both everyday liberals and flat-out perverts are morally immature solipsists, and their desperate fear that they could be wrong is what unites them. W as a society will not recover from their influence as long as the society embraces the spirit of the self-directed, aggressive Moral Revolutionist Ubermensch unanswerable to anyone besides himself.
9 posted on
08/26/2007 5:04:29 AM PDT by
Mmmike
To: Kaslin
This should be handled without creating another law. Perhaps a few dozen people carrying coffee down those stairs could “accidentally” spill it right where he’s sitting.
11 posted on
08/26/2007 5:26:14 AM PDT by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
To: Kaslin
I've always said liberals are like toddlers. They don't ever want to hear the word NO because it's like having strict parents.
No molesting.
No drugs.
No stopping me or anyone else from whatever we want.
And I'm going to stamp my feet and hold my breath until I get what I want.
14 posted on
08/26/2007 6:40:39 AM PDT by
Lizavetta
( Politicians: When they're speaking, they're lying - when they're not speaking, they're stealing.)
To: Kaslin
Because Liberal spelled backwards is
PERVERT!
17 posted on
08/26/2007 7:03:29 AM PDT by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar--Quae Cum Ita Sunt, (Since these things are so))
To: Kaslin; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Aleighanne; ...
18 posted on
08/26/2007 8:59:17 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Kaslin
The bill would make it illegal to look at a persons sexual or other intimate parts, in other than a casual or cursory manner, for the purpose of entertainment, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing the person being viewed.Do you get busted if you stare too long at Hooters?
20 posted on
08/26/2007 9:14:19 AM PDT by
Doe Eyes
To: Kaslin
Of course, to a liberal, âperversionâ is a meaningless term; an archaic idea invented by conservatives to repress freedom of expression. Perversion, to a liberal, implies application of the principal of absolute values, which results in repression of freedom. A âpervertâ is simply a misguided individual who didnât have the resources of a powerful and benevolent government to help him learn the right way. Of course, a conservative is always to blame for this limiting of nanny-govenment.
Or, pervert can also refer to an "artist."
21 posted on
08/26/2007 11:16:25 AM PDT by
fwdude
To: Kaslin
Wow! An article about liberals, the ACLU, and protecting perversion, without mentioning former Virginia ACLU president Charles Rust-Tierney, who just plead guilty to possessing over 850 images of child pornography.
-PJ
22 posted on
08/26/2007 11:22:17 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
To: Kaslin
I might have nightmares tonight about what feminazi lawyers will do with a law against looking.
Before writing a new law, did anyone try calling the cops to see what they could do about the perv? I can't imagine they'd just leave him there to eat his breakfast (and fantasize about lunch) in peace!
23 posted on
08/26/2007 11:52:29 AM PDT by
irv
To: Kaslin
It's only "imprecise" if no one desires justice or decency for the privacy of women and children. And it is impossible for it to be an invitation to abuse if men have their heads faced forward, and would perhaps bother to look women in the eyes. It is unfathomable to me that this guy considers himself a conservative. He now wants to legislate where people "look" while they're walking down the street.
25 posted on
08/26/2007 1:52:28 PM PDT by
GunRunner
(Come on Fred, how long are you going to wait?)
To: Kaslin
There definitely needs to be a law against shop owners drilling holes or inserting cameras in dressing rooms. I would be very alarmed if I knew someone was looking at me while I got changed. I think the police ought to do something about this pervert because one day just looking might not be enough.
26 posted on
08/26/2007 3:01:24 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...
To: Kaslin
I think it's more about what liberals are "against" than what they are "for."
Liberals' fight is against God, Christianity, the rule of law, justice, freedom, democracy, common decency, and all that is good in society.
If it means they have to take sides with a few perverts, so be it.
31 posted on
08/27/2007 4:01:02 AM PDT by
wai-ming
To: Kaslin
I sympathize with the intent behind Vallone’s actions to craft a law, but this law was very poorly worded. If passed, it would be very dangerous. No proof would be needed, just the word of the person wronged.
Think ex-wife or girlfriend or co-worker. Think nightmare.
32 posted on
08/27/2007 4:32:17 AM PDT by
sauropod
(You can’t spell crap without the AP in it.)
To: Kaslin
the democrats are the party of minorities, gays, lesbians, and perverts.
36 posted on
08/27/2007 6:25:46 AM PDT by
television is just wrong
(deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END WELFARE.i)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson