Why Liberals Always Protect Perverts

Townhall.com ^ | August 26, 2007 | Kevin McCullough

[goldstategop]

Liberals pander to perverts. Their presidential candidates showed up a gay themed "debate" no one watched to out-do each other in their support for the pervert agenda. Trust me, the last they thing they are is family values folks.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[Stallone]

‘Thought’ crimes versus physical crimes?

Why is it that so-called Conservatives so often undermine our entire political belief system with such nonsense?

Conservatives believe in personal freedom and personal responsibility.

Depriving someone else of same is a crime.

There is no equivalence between standing under a platform hoping to catch a glimpse of panties or less, and the killing of a child.

Completely and utterly ridiculous.

[Kaslin]

Exactly, and the last thing they also are is religious, even though they are now trying to pander to the religious

[wintertime]

They had a great time slamming Catholic priests but overlook the daily reports of sexual abuse of children by government teachers.

[sure_fine]

ggggg

[John Valentine]

I’m with you, and I don’t categorize this positon as “catering to perverts.”

I see it as catering to common sense. we have far too many laws already. As much as I hate to say it, I agree with Ron Kuby; this bill will bring him untold riches defending people against many egregious misapplications of this malconceived law.

[Lazamataz]

This is a very badly-worded law. I would absolutely be in favor of a law preventing peeping, but the way this thing was written, it becomes an unenforceable thought-crime-style law. I was about to blast Stallone for defending peeping, then I read the article closer -- and this law is a huge pile of CRAP.

The ACLU is right on this one.

[Mmmike]

Both everyday liberals and flat-out perverts are morally immature solipsists, and their desperate fear that they could be wrong is what unites them. W as a society will not recover from their influence as long as the society embraces the spirit of the self-directed, aggressive Moral Revolutionist Ubermensch unanswerable to anyone besides himself.

[Mmmike]

(”W as a society” = “We as a society”)

[Dilbert56]

This should be handled without creating another law. Perhaps a few dozen people carrying coffee down those stairs could “accidentally” spill it right where he’s sitting.

[MamaTexan]

Perhaps a few dozen people carrying coffee down those stairs could “accidentally” spill it right where he’s sitting.

Your post is very close to what I was thinking.

How about giving away LARGE cups of very hot coffee to ladies in skirts and encourage them to 'accidentally' spill half of it down the vent the perve likes to park himself under?

[Stallone]

[Lizavetta]

I've always said liberals are like toddlers. They don't ever want to hear the word NO because it's like having strict parents.
No molesting.
No drugs.
No stopping me or anyone else from whatever we want.
And I'm going to stamp my feet and hold my breath until I get what I want.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Liberals pander to perverts. Their presidential candidates showed up a gay themed "debate" no one watched to out-do each other in their support for the pervert agenda.

[Republic]

Now THERE is a great solution.....as long as the coffee is really really HOT!

[Young Werther]

Because Liberal spelled backwards is

PERVERT!

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[Farmer Dean]

Nothing will damage your political life quite like leading a fag parade.At least in the midwest.On the coasts it’s probably a resume enhancer.

[Doe Eyes]

The bill would make it illegal to look at a person’s “sexual or other intimate parts, in other than a casual or cursory manner, for the purpose of entertainment, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing the person being viewed.

Do you get busted if you stare too long at Hooters?