Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Ham-fisted" and "venemous religious tract": Reviews for "September Dawn"
RottenTomatoes.com ^ | 08/23/07 | Various

Posted on 08/23/2007 5:45:11 PM PDT by Reaganesque

"This handsome indie Western damningly recounts the 1857 slayings of 120 settlers passing through Utah, but the didactic presentation, grim speechifying and tacked-on love story all signify a less-than-healthy regard for the audience's intelligence."
Click for Full Review  Variety   Justin Chang

1/4
1/4 "The film feels less like historical drama than a venomous religious tract printed on celluloid."
Click for Full Review  Minneapolis Star Tribune   Colin Covert

 

"September Dawn has the ham-fisted lyricism of political ads and pharmaceutical commercials."
Click for Full Review  Village Voice   J. Hoberman

 

"When the movie isn't doling out ham-fisted history...it gives us magnificent vistas of a pristine prairie...and there's a deep sweetness to the subplot of Jonathan and Emily falling in love."
Click for Full Review  Film Journal International   Frank Lovece

1.5/4
1.5/4 "When watching the screen depiction of a historic event in which 120 people were murdered, giggling is not the appropriate response."
Click for Full Review  Salt Lake Tribune   Sean Means


1/5 "It has the chilling certitude of the self-righteous."
Click for Full Review  Orlando Sentinel   Roger Moore

2.5/5
2.5/5 "The real problem is that September Dawn isn't a very good movie. It moves too much like a public-school history pageant and gives us mono-dimensional characters who speak dialogue that fairly reeks of printer's ink."
Click for Full Review  Arizona Republic   Richard Nilsen

1/5
1/5 "The jarring MTV-style filmmaking is so distracting and the 'messaging' so unsubtle that after two long hours you find yourself leaving the theater with a massive headache, wondering when you started to hate Mormons."
Click for Full Review  Orlando Weekly   Brett Register

1/4
1/4 "Forget Grindhouse. September Dawn is the year's first honest-to-goodness exploitation flick."
Click for Full Review  Slant Magazine   Nick Schager

1/4
1/4 "Bombastic, slow-drying dramatization with lead-weight dialogue and a turgid romantic subplot."
Click for Full Review  Newsday   Gene Seymour

D-
D- "Has serious problems in historical terms. But in this case they're exacerbated by the simple ineptitude of the filmmaking."
Click for Full Review  One Guy's Opinion   Frank Swietek

"Even if one gets past the movie's controversial depictions, there is the matter of its second-rate, made-for-television fare -- the poor battle choreography, the wooden editing and the cheesy writing."
Click for Full Review  Washington Post   Desson Thomson

2.5/4
2.5/4 "If September Dawn is a kind of Western, it's a Western utterly devoid of heroism or the usual archetypes. But the core message transcends time: Hatred laced with religious fanaticism is a toxic blend."
Click for Full Review  Milwaukee Journal Sentinel   Dave Tianen

1/4
1/4 "Doesn't even measure up to an episode of your typical, cowboy TV show from the Fifties like Roy Rogers or The Lone Ranger. Get my drift, Kimosabe?"
Click for Full Review  NewsBlaze   Kam Williams

Click here for links to the full reviews.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dawn; fistsofhams; hamfisted; hamhamhamham; movie; moviereview; reviews; september; septemberdawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-423 next last
To: colorcountry

It’s been covered before, in books and documentaries. Fictionalized movies give a mixture of truth and entertainment with emphasis on the latter.

BTW, I’m no longer a Christian, but when I was I considered Mormons to be Christians. I still do.


81 posted on 08/23/2007 9:40:11 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
OK. If they released it to knock Mitt out of the primary, their strategy is idiotic.

They should have waited a year, hoping he’d be nominated, and then release it shortly before the general election.

How in the world does eliminating Romney from the primaries help the Democrats? Only if you think Mitt is the most electable candidate, which is at best debatable.

These are republicans who produce this movie and maybe were not to keen on Romney getting the nomination!

Timing is every thing!

82 posted on 08/23/2007 9:43:17 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: restornu

We don’t need to attack Jon Voight.


83 posted on 08/23/2007 9:47:29 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
It’s been covered before, in books and documentaries. Fictionalized movies give a mixture of truth and entertainment with emphasis on the latter.

So what do you believe is a valid subject for a movie, since we can't make historical pictures? 300? Braveheart? Joan of Arc? The Scarlet Letter? Roots? Gunfight at the O.K. Corral? I think you get my drift, right?

BTW, I’m no longer a Christian, but when I was I considered Mormons to be Christians. I still do.

Good for you. I don't.

84 posted on 08/23/2007 9:48:49 PM PDT by colorcountry (Silence isn't always golden.....Sometimes it's just yellow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
Heh heh. It’s real funny when the Christians complain about anyone else’s history of blood and corpses. Pot meet kettle.

Well, okay, thanks for that. You're a saucepan.
85 posted on 08/23/2007 9:51:57 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Republicans make movies?


86 posted on 08/23/2007 9:53:51 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
We don’t need to attack Jon Voight. I heard the interviews of him and I am not attacking him I am point out conflict of interest here!

In the interviews these are things that came out.

It is Joh who used in the interview a religious fanitic which gives a different flavor to this.

I don't know the details they did not do autopsy in those days I guess. I am sure the rogue Mormons did do it but if the stories of disarming is true I don't? I am sure the rogues were paranoid and thought they needed to do this. The whole thing still remains a mystery. I am a convert so I have no family history to protect.

87 posted on 08/23/2007 9:55:33 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Republicans make movies?

That is a funny question why not?

Jon Voight is a Republican and so is the director.

88 posted on 08/23/2007 9:58:14 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: restornu
these were a bunch of paranoid folks who did not keep the faith nor follow the commandments of their file leader or the Lord.

If so, it apparently affected the entire Church in SW Utah.

The attack was ordered by the local Church leaders and implemented by the regional militia in their organized bands.

Did Young specifically order the attack? Doubtful. He wasn't that stupid. Although the Church suffered remarkably little blowback from the incident, managing to pin the entire blame on one man, JD Lee.

BTW, what's a file leader?

89 posted on 08/23/2007 9:58:37 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Somebody put out a talking points list.

Not really. The term "ham-fisted" gets used all the time to describe schlock filmmaking. Or, consider a few groaner, played-out FReeper items that might lead one to believe in the talking points:

1. Jump The Shark
2. Beyond the Pale
3. Ilk
4. Bush's fault

Get my point?
90 posted on 08/23/2007 10:01:22 PM PDT by LanaTurnerOverdrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: restornu

The movie is entertainment and propaganda. Unfortunately, most people will look upon it as a documentary. As we know, most people are really that gullible.

Voight appears to be one of those nice guy idealists. I wish he’d read the books and stayed away from making the movies.


91 posted on 08/23/2007 10:01:49 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

File leader was used in a positive way for those in the priesthood to follow the leader in your group.

To keep the Lord‘s covenants

Like Boys scout so there is order and not chaos!

But the way it sound these guys were a group onto themselves and did not listen.


92 posted on 08/23/2007 10:06:08 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: restornu

It’s pretty well known that most people in the movie business are liberal Democrats.


93 posted on 08/23/2007 10:06:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
A few of the more extreme Mormons try to make the attack out to be some kind of self-defense against dangerous invaders who were murdering, pillaging and poisoning their way across UT, with intent to bring back an army from CA and kill all Mormons.

While I don't condone what John D. Lee and others did to the Fancher party, some members of the Fancher party DID make those very threats. They boasted of their participation in the murders of innocent Mormons in Missouri, and promised to bring more of the same on the Mormons in Utah. Such threats and boasting remove those making them from the "innocent" category.

Imagine Osama Bin Laden traveling through your neighborhood bragging about 9/11, pointing at you and saying "You're next infidel!". You would give him a glass of goat milk and wish him well?

94 posted on 08/23/2007 10:12:23 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I am sure Jon is an idealist but he also was not too keen of his Mormon mother in law!

I have not been able to get to the bottem of this family estrangement or fued!

They worked closely with the Francher folks and never used the Church at for understanding.

If they were sincere they would have launch it in 06


95 posted on 08/23/2007 10:13:55 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Production on this movie probably started at least three and perhaps five years ago.

If they had so much lead time why is it such a turkey?

No, really, how can one get a truthful and factual answer to the real lead time?

96 posted on 08/23/2007 10:14:32 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
There are facts here. It's thought-provoking in the ways it makes you consider how this event resembles that later 9/11.

The reviewer is a idiot,comparing one incendent to 1500 years of muslim rape,looting,and mass murder is obscene
This just a bad attempt to white wash 9/11 by dhimmis and usefull idiots

97 posted on 08/23/2007 10:15:13 PM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

“”Imagine Osama Bin Laden traveling through your neighborhood bragging about 9/11, pointing at you and saying “You’re next infidel!”. You would give him a glass of goat milk and wish him well?””

Makes me think back to post 46.


98 posted on 08/23/2007 10:17:27 PM PDT by ansel12 ( "Show me the personal political scars Romney bears for conservatism and for America".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I would be real curious to see how prominent Mitt was as a potential candidate then, shortly after his election as MA gov.

There were rumors floating around during the 2002 Olympic

99 posted on 08/23/2007 10:17:44 PM PDT by restornu (Teach them correct principals and let them govern themselves ~ Joseph Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Might want to make it clear that you believe Joseph Smith to be a prophet, rather than a clever huckster bent on making up fun stories about Indians using scimitars and iron, riding horses and such.

Just a question for you: Why is Jesus not sufficient?


100 posted on 08/23/2007 10:17:52 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-423 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson