Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women really do prefer pink, researchers say
Reuters via Yahoo ^ | 2007 Aug 20 | Reuters

Posted on 08/21/2007 11:32:12 AM PDT by Brujo

Boys like blue, girls like pink and there isn't much anybody can do about it, researchers said on Monday in one of the first studies to show scientifically that there are gender-based color preferences.

Researchers said these differences may have a basis in evolution in which females developed a preference for reddish colors associated with riper fruit and healthier faces.

...

"We speculate that this sex difference arose from sex-specific functional specialization in the evolutionary division of labor," she wrote in Current Biology. "There are biological reasons for liking reddish things."

...

"Women have a very clear pattern. It's low in the yellow and green regions and rises to a peak in the purplish to reddish region," she said.

...

For men, thinking about colors was less important because as hunters they just needed to spot something dark and shoot it, Hurlbert said.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; menfrommars; psychology; sexdifferences; sixdifferences; womenfromvenus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
Yet another biologically based gender difference. That statement about why men don't think about color is hilarious.
1 posted on 08/21/2007 11:32:14 AM PDT by Brujo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brujo

so do men....


2 posted on 08/21/2007 11:34:07 AM PDT by stylin19a (Go Bears !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brujo
Homos too.

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.

3 posted on 08/21/2007 11:34:15 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brujo

“For men, thinking about colors was less important because as hunters they just needed to spot something dark and shoot it, Hurlbert said.”

That WOULD be hilarious if the guy who said it hadn’t actually believed it. Now it’s just sad.


4 posted on 08/21/2007 11:35:10 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Homos too.

Be advised that todays politically correct terminology is gay homosexual. :>)

5 posted on 08/21/2007 11:37:43 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brujo

We can only hope that millions of taxpayer dollars were spent studying this.


6 posted on 08/21/2007 11:38:31 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brujo

Did they survey Rosie O’Donnell, Martina Navratilova, or K.D. Lang?


7 posted on 08/21/2007 11:38:33 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG (Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

Didn’t feminists say that there are no biological differences between men and women, with the possible exception of between the legs differences?


8 posted on 08/21/2007 11:38:47 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

The term homosexual is considered insulting by some, because it is a sterile clinical term. That term focuses only on certain behavior and not the whole person, so some in that community don’t like that term anymore.


9 posted on 08/21/2007 11:40:11 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“Didn’t feminists say that there are no biological differences between men and women, with the possible exception of between the legs differences?”

And that’s nothing a little tax-payer funded surgery won’t fix.


10 posted on 08/21/2007 11:40:20 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“The term homosexual is considered insulting by some, because it is a sterile clinical term.”

If one is offended by “sterile, clinical terms”, there is NOTHING that won’t offend them.


11 posted on 08/21/2007 11:41:44 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

Be advised that todays politically correct terminology is gay homosexual. :>)”

I think “fags” or a longer version of that is acceptable, also. Or, wait, do I have that backwards...


12 posted on 08/21/2007 11:41:49 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
That WOULD be hilarious if the guy who said it hadn't actually believed it. Now it's just sad.

Actually it's a woman—“Anya Hurlbert”—who wrote the report. I think she was grasping for a reason why her husband would rather chew glass than go with her to pick out just the right shade of off-white for the dining room trim.

(Oops, I slipped into gender-based stereotyping again! ;-)

13 posted on 08/21/2007 11:42:37 AM PDT by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So they have to corrupt a good word to FEEEEL better!

Queers corrupt anything they touch!

14 posted on 08/21/2007 11:42:54 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I can pretty much say that I have never and will never own one of these.....


And if someone....say, a female.....should ever buy me one and expect me to wear it, siad female be shown the door.
15 posted on 08/21/2007 11:44:03 AM PDT by shbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Oh I’m sure they like pink, too.


16 posted on 08/21/2007 11:45:02 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Did they survey Rosie OÂ’Donnell, Martina Navratilova, or K.D. Lang?

Hmm, I sense a large government grant: Gender Preference and its Effect on Chromatic Preferences.

(Unfortunately, probably not “:-)”.)

17 posted on 08/21/2007 11:45:55 AM PDT by Brujo (Quod volunt, credunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

18 posted on 08/21/2007 11:46:44 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG (Apparently my former party considers me an "ugly nativist".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brujo

Evolution can explain color preferences, too? *Roll eyes*

Is there ANYTHING it can’t do?


19 posted on 08/21/2007 11:47:27 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brujo
“Boys like blue, girls like pink and there isn’t much anybody can do about it”

NAG’s feminazi’s aren’t going to like this!

20 posted on 08/21/2007 11:48:06 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson