Posted on 08/12/2007 11:31:05 PM PDT by Loud Mime
There are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. James Madison (speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, 16 June 1788)
Slavery is such an atrocious debasement of human nature, that its very extirpation, if not performed with solicitous care, may sometimes open a source of serious evils. - Benjamin Franklin (An Address to the Public, November 1789)
It should therefore be difficult in a republic to declare war; but not to make peace. -- Joseph Story (Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833)
and I'll add one more:
“Peace without justice is tyranny.” = = William Allen White
2. Discussion: Slavery was a necessary element in the founding of the United States.
3. The Constitution calls for no official action on behalf of Congress to end a war, or, as in today's politics, to allow a surrender.
4. Liberals never heard of this one.
Not a founder but a lot of sense!
I found how the World had been misled by prostitute Writers, to ascribe the greatest Exploits in War to Cowards, the wisest Counsel to Fools, Sincerity to Flatterers, Roman Virtue to Betrayers of their Country, Piety to Atheists, Chastity to Sodomites, Truth to Informers.
(III:8;5)
Here I discovered the secret Causes of many great Events that have surprized the World, how a Whore can Govern the Back-stairs, the Back-stairs a Council, and the Council a Senate.
(III:8)
There was a society of men among us, bred up from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black and black is white, according as they are paid.
(IV:5)
Gulliver’s Travels
by Jonathan Swift
The gradual encroachments upon our liberties during the 29th century are more numerous than I can list. And, all of them were to bring us more liberty or for the well being of all.
And, like good little sheeple, we sat back and watched as it happened and keeps happening.
oops, make that 20th century, not 29th. That’s what I get for commenting half asleep ;-)
For a minute there, I thought you were a time traveller!
Sadly, the way our country is going, it’s probably going to be long gone WAY before the 29th century.
Benjamin Franklin
We are losing our freedoms by consent.
I can’t count the freedoms I’ve had taken away in just the last month. Seriously, about all that’s left is FR.
Are our three branches the Executive, Congress and Senate?
"Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.
In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed. "
Executive, Legislative (Senate and House), Judicial.
The Senators used to be appointed by the States, until the 17th Amendment was ratified. Now the Senate is just another House of Representatives (which represents the emotions of the people and various political factions) instead of the protection of State liberties.
I firmly believe that the 17th Amendment started the downfall of our republic.
(pardon my double-ping)
"All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.
"However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
Please pardon the correction. I'm a real sticker for that underlined word. Here's one of the sources .
"A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." ~ Alexander Hamilton
Once again we are facing totalitarianism on the march - what will we do?
Last week I was at a coffee shop in downtown Los Angeles. Sitting two tables away from me was the tyrant, Henry Waxman, giving an interview. He was being doted on by all the others who recognized him.
He caught me scowling at him; his smile faded.
I feel a time of "letters to the editor" is on its way.
Please understand that I tender any correction with humility, and as a friend.
I argue with a lot of liberals. They continually leave out the word “essential” when attempting to make their point about the data mining and wiretapping of suspected terrorists.
(Did you ever notice that the liberals put themselves in the position of a suspected terrorist when they complain about all these war powers?)
I then point out Article I, Section 9 of our Constitution, which allows the imprisionment of people without habeas corpus priviledges, which surprises the liberals.
The liberals don’t understand that the founding fathers believed that our nation should be defended, not surrendered.
Did someone remove Article III when we weren't looking?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.