Skip to comments.
The Threatening Storm
Time ^
| August 2, 2007
| Michael Grunwald
Posted on 08/12/2007 9:36:16 PM PDT by Lorianne
The most important thing to remember about the drowning of New Orleans is that it wasn't a natural disaster. It was a man-made disaster, created by lousy engineering, misplaced priorities and pork-barrel politics. Katrina was not the Category 5 killer the Big Easy had always feared; it was a Category 3 storm that missed New Orleans, where it was at worst a weak 2. The city's defenses should have withstood its surges, and if they had we never would have seen the squalor in the Superdome, the desperation on the rooftops, the shocking tableau of the Mardi Gras city underwater for weeks. We never would have heard the comment "Heckuva job, Brownie." The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was the scapegoat, but the real culprit was the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which bungled the levees that formed the city's man-made defenses and ravaged the wetlands that once formed its natural defenses. Americans were outraged by the government's response, but they still haven't come to grips with the government's responsibility for the catastrophe.
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: blamegame; grunwald; katrina; mindbogglingspin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Can't even begin to comment on the ways this article willfully omits the obvious. Don't fool with Mother Nature.
1
posted on
08/12/2007 9:36:17 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
Don’t plant houses under sea level—unless you’re in Death Valley.
2
posted on
08/12/2007 9:38:04 PM PDT
by
bannie
(The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones playing by the rules.)
To: Lorianne
Someone break out the ‘Not this S*** again” pic, please.
3
posted on
08/12/2007 9:44:01 PM PDT
by
Darkwolf377
(FRED '08! (Use caps, it bugs the haters))
To: Lorianne
It would be cheaper to raze New Orleans and let Nature reclaim the Valley. But that wouldn't provide photo ops to power hungry politicians. What a wasted opportunity.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
4
posted on
08/12/2007 9:44:02 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: bannie
Keep a canoe in the attic, with a side window for launching it.
That way you can loot the bars and bistros in the French Quarter and be back into your new bayou digs before dawn.
5
posted on
08/12/2007 9:46:00 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
To: Lorianne
I survived Katrina where it really hit; in Biloxi, Mississippi. Had the democrats (that have run New Orleans since the War Between the States) spent the money on the levees and other protection that was allocated this never would’ve been a problem. Corps of Engineers my Aunt Fanny!! The graft and corruption in Louisiana (run by democrats) is reminiscent of a third-world dictatorship.
6
posted on
08/12/2007 9:48:53 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
To: Lorianne
The real culprits were the generations of Louisiana politicians who didn’t see to their levees. Many were named Landreu.
7
posted on
08/12/2007 9:49:54 PM PDT
by
LexBaird
(Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: Lorianne
While msybe not a Cat 5 (which btw only refers to wind velocity), Katrina was physically a huge storm in area and consequently moved a massive amount of water ahead of it. Surges were 30 feet with up to 65 foot waves on top of that. It had one of the largest ever recorded storm surges in the gulf. While a portion of the destruction was certainly due to bad engineering, the bulk of the destruction was simply due to an extremely horrific storm.
8
posted on
08/12/2007 9:51:36 PM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: Lorianne
Since it's OUR MONEY they're using to rebuild, couldn't we get SOME sort of zoning or something to only allow construction ABOVE sea level? Yes, it would be SO much cheaper to raze the entire city and rebuild it on dry land, even going so far as to dredge a shipping canal to wherever the new city is build, ala Galveston TX.
What a waste of OUR MONEY!
9
posted on
08/12/2007 9:51:51 PM PDT
by
mukraker
To: Lorianne
Before Katrina, the Corps was spending more in Louisiana than in any other state, but much of it was going to wasteful and destructive pork instead of protection for New Orleans;It is my understanding that the money for levees, allocated by the Federal Govt., is controlled by the State Levee Board, and the Corps can only do the jobs for which the Levee Board has approved funds. I also believe that for years, the Levee Board has spent the money INTENDED for the levees in New Orleans, on their own pet projects elsewhere in the state; just part of the corruption that permeates Louisiana politics.
So if the Corp only has the money for the jobs that the Louisiana politicians want done, just who's fault is it that the levees in New Orleans were not kept in good repair?
I believe some of this will come out in the race for Governor, with Bobby Jindal bearing the standard for the Republican Party. I sure hope they can find another strong Republican somewhere in the state who can run against Mary Landrieu when she comes up for re-election!
10
posted on
08/12/2007 10:01:48 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Lorianne
What doomed Louisiana .. was the corrupt Louisiana Government
Audit their books on where all the money went
11
posted on
08/12/2007 10:09:40 PM PDT
by
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
To: Darkwolf377
Well ...

As you requested ...................... FRegards
12
posted on
08/12/2007 10:26:02 PM PDT
by
gonzo
(In Florida, inmates make cigarettes in jail that I buy, and I can go to jail for smoking one! WTF?)
To: Darkwolf377
As a Geologist educated in Louisiana with special emphasis on the Louisiana Gulf Coast and Mississippi River, I find this article (to my great surprise) very accurate and fair with only a few minor errors. However, they failed to give the solution to the problem, and it is quite simple.
Do not issue any new government backed insurance to any place in this nation for flood damage. This insurance has made it economical to build in places that should have never been used for homes and business and cities. In the case of New Orleans we must not issue new insurance to those that lost their homes and business properties. Economics will solve the problem.
Lastly we must cut the levees below New Orleans to restore the flow of river sediments to the marsh land that protects New Orleans.
Lastly you must always remember that you can not control the Mississippi River. You can put levees on it, and build dikes and install great pumps, but in the end it will take the shortest route to Gulf of Mexico. New Orleans is doomed and Morgan City will eventually be at the bottom of the New Mississippi River when it finally breaks through the levees of the Morganza Spillway where the Red River once emptied into the Mississippi. It will happen!
13
posted on
08/12/2007 10:28:16 PM PDT
by
cpdiii
(Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
To: Lorianne
I was in the New Orleans area about six days after Katrina hit. I was with a volunteer church group which included a FEMA credentialed paramedic. We ended up on the Nichol State University campus in Thibbeduaux where we helped set up housing and emergency medical facilities in two gymnasiums. Many of the FEMA people—who came from as far away as California and New England—told me that they had all been staged at the stadium when the storm hit. Within hours the water began to rise, because the levees were breached, and the drivers of emergency vehicles of all types were forced to drive them up onto the highway ramps to escape water damage. When the water didn’t subside they were ordered to Thibbedaux and Houma and other centers to set up emergency shelters. New Orleans residents were bused to these camps where they were given food, shelter, clolthes and medical care. The operation was extraordinarily smooth and efficient. I meet hundreds of evacuees and they weren’t comlaining. Many were still in shock but all seemed grateful their needs were being satisfied though in a rudementary way. Most seemed just glad to be alive.
14
posted on
08/12/2007 10:34:42 PM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: cpdiii
"...and Morgan City will eventually be at the bottom of the New Mississippi River when it finally breaks through the levees of the Morganza Spillway..."
I mean no offense to any that live there (or at least some of them), but Morgan City could use a good rinsing, INMHO.
15
posted on
08/12/2007 10:42:18 PM PDT
by
BlueDragon
(looking at the Dems, I can't help but thinking, "I'm surrounded by <strike>idiots!</strike>fools!")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Corps of Engineers my Aunt Fanny!! The graft and corruption in Louisiana (run by democrats) is reminiscent of a third-world dictatorship." As a Louisiana native, I say you are correct. The interference of politics with the engineering projects at both state and local levels was THE cause.
But then again, who expects TIME magazine to EVER get a story right???
To: Kirkwood
"While a portion of the destruction was certainly due to bad engineering, the bulk of the destruction was simply due to an extremely horrific storm." True of the Biloxi area. Not true of New Orleans.
To: cpdiii
"New Orleans is doomed and Morgan City will eventually be at the bottom of the New Mississippi River when it finally breaks through the levees of the Morganza Spillway where the Red River once emptied into the Mississippi. It will happen!" You were doing pretty good until you made this statement. It won't be at the Morganza Spillway. If it happens, it'll be at the Old River Control Structure (it "almost" happened there once before).
To: cpdiii
I thought it was a fair assessment as well, at least until I got to this:
The straitjacketed river now carries less than half its original sediment load down to Louisiana. So there's little new land-building material to offset the natural erosion of the coast, much less the unnatural rising of the sea fueled by global warming.
Yeah, that half a millimeter a year is really the issue *boggle*.
19
posted on
08/13/2007 4:33:24 AM PDT
by
Malsua
To: Lorianne
Gee, how many years after Katrina does Time take to tell the truth? Typical.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson