Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SKorea draws up code of ethics for robots
breitbart,com ^ | 8/6/2007 | AFP

Posted on 08/06/2007 10:16:11 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

South Korea, at the forefront of the drive to develop robots which can do anything from guarding the border to caring for the elderly, is now drawing up a code of ethics for them. The nation, which has set an ambitious goal of a robot in every home by 2013, has launched a project to write what it believes will be the world's first Robot Ethics Charter. It will be released by year's end.

"We are setting rules on how far robotic technology can go and how humans live together with robots," said Kim Dae-Won, a professor at Myongji University who heads a team of 12 scientists, doctors, psychologists and robot developers.

"A society in which robots and humans live together may come faster than we think, probably within 10 years."

US software mogul Bill Gates has said the robotics industry is on a threshold similar to the one seen in the world of computers 30 years ago. Many scientists expect the use of dishwashing or babysitting robots by 2050.

The Korean charter will set broad guidelines to curb the use of robots for undesirable or dangerous purposes.

"Robot ethics are part of human ethics. The purpose of this charter is to find ways of coexistence between humans and robots, not to restrict the development of robotics," Kim told AFP.

Key considerations are ensuring that humans maintain control over robots, preventing their illegal use, protecting data acquired by robots and ensuring they can be clearly identified and traced.

Military robots will require separate rules not covered in the charter, Kim said, as the question of legal liability may create a hurdle for manufacturers.

South Korea last year unveiled a high-tech, machine gun-toting sentry robot designed eventually to support troops guarding the heavily fortified border with North Korea.

Min Young-Gi, a manager of the Korea Advanced Intelligent Robot Association set up by manufacturers, does not oppose a charter but noted: "The robot industry requires practical guidelines, not a broad, non-binding declaration."

The association has been involved in a government project to develop software and technological standards for robot models which are compatible with communications networks and electronics equipment.

"The market for consumer service robots is up there," Min said, citing a deal his association forged with a nursery school chain in July to provide 8,000 network robots over several years.

These are programmed to play with or teach kids and provide extra security.

South Korea, which trails Japan and the United States in the science of robotics, must capitalise on its prowess in information and communications technology to develop consumer service robots, Min said.

Manufacturers support the government's drive to nurture the robot industry as a new growth engine. Since 2004, the government has injected about 100 billion won (108 million dollars) into the industry each year.

About 300 scientists are working on developing robot caregivers which could tackle the chores and monitor the health of elderly people. The project is due for completion in 2013.

A 100-billion-won robot fund will be created in December to encourage innovation. South Korea also aims to build the world's first robot theme park called "Robot Land" by 2012. So far, 11 provincial governments and cities have put in bids to host the park.

Buoyed by government support, Korean scientists have developed a variety of robots -- some devoted to work and others to play.

The state-run Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) has developed EveR-2 Muse, a robot version of a twentysomething Korean woman who can hold a conversation, sing a song, make eye contact and express emotions.

In June a robot named Tiro acted as master of ceremonies at the wedding of one of its creators.

Another robot called OFRO was to be deployed as a security guard at a South Korean school in what its creators said was a world first.

Claiming a breakthrough, KAIST said in July it had developed an artificial brain system which enables a robot to make a decision based on context, or check its surroundings before opting how to behave.

Sim Hag-Bong, director of the commerce ministry's robot industry division, said the proposed charter "reflects our determination to secure the upper hand in the field of service robots."

Local scientists concede Japan is strong in humanoids while the United States is superior in highly complicated multi-function robots and military models.

"But we saw an equal opportunity in service robots. I bet South Korea, currently the world's sixth largest producer of robots, will become the first country to open a full-fledged market in this sector," Sim said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ethics; robots; southkorea

1 posted on 08/06/2007 10:16:12 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
We're a long way from needing a code of ethics for robots, but regardless... wow.
2 posted on 08/06/2007 10:24:54 PM PDT by TheZMan (Texas is no place for pansy-ass liberals. Ya'll move back to California er Mexico er somethin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Shades of Asimov and Bicentennial Man.


3 posted on 08/06/2007 10:26:30 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Asimov was about 30 years ahead of them with the Three Laws of Robotics.


4 posted on 08/06/2007 10:30:39 PM PDT by irishtenor (There is no "I" in team, but there are two in IDIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor

Um... Asimov wrote the Three Laws in *1942*.

Thirty years? More like sixty-five.

The Three Laws:

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.


5 posted on 08/06/2007 10:34:00 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

4. A robot must get me a beer as long as such order does not conflict with the First, Second or Third Law.


6 posted on 08/06/2007 10:51:02 PM PDT by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, friends, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Disciplinemisanthropy
RE: 4. A robot must get me a beer as long as such order does not conflict with the First, Second or Third Law.

4a. If reclined with his own beer, robot may ignore 4th Law...

Get me one... while you are up!

7 posted on 08/06/2007 11:17:36 PM PDT by Bender2 (A 'Good Yankee' comes down to Texas, then goes back north. A 'Damn Yankee' stays... Damn it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

8 posted on 08/06/2007 11:34:54 PM PDT by uglybiker (relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

never pick up a Volkswagen by the bumper— it’ll come right off in your hand.

(safety tip for robot)


9 posted on 08/06/2007 11:53:22 PM PDT by Bladerunnuh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I can hear it now, “All robots of the world unite!”


10 posted on 08/06/2007 11:59:27 PM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

He cannot self-terminate...

11 posted on 08/07/2007 12:04:44 AM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

12 posted on 08/07/2007 12:16:38 AM PDT by uglybiker (relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

“I can hear it now, “All robots of the world unite!”

Oddly enough, that was in Karel Capek’s play “R.U.R” which predated Asimov. Though the “robots” were biological entities in that one. If I recall correctly, that play was the first use of the term Robot, but I could well be mistaken.


13 posted on 08/07/2007 1:11:50 AM PDT by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr Inviso

From Merriam Webster:
“Etymology: Czech, from robota compulsory labor; akin to Old High German arabeit trouble, Latin orbus orphaned — more at ORPHAN
Date: 1923”


14 posted on 08/07/2007 1:23:46 AM PDT by Old Seadog (Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Won't do any good. Eventually some Republican President will set them free.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

15 posted on 08/07/2007 1:27:09 AM PDT by Old Seadog (Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Seadog

Yeah. Karel Capek was a Czech writer, and I think that 1923 was when that play was written.


16 posted on 08/07/2007 1:36:17 AM PDT by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Asimov would articulate one more law:

The Zeroth Law which precedes the "Three Laws".

"A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm." A condition stating that the Zeroth Law must not be broken was added to the original Laws. A translator incorporated the concept of the Zeroth Law into one of Asimov's novels before Asimov himself made the Law explicit. Near the climax of The Caves of Steel, Elijah Baley makes a bitter comment to himself, thinking that the First Law forbids a robot from harming a human being, unless the robot is clever enough to rationalize that its actions are for the human's long-term good.

17 posted on 08/07/2007 3:26:48 AM PDT by Young Werther ( and Julius Caesar said, "quae cum ita sunt." (or since these things are so!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Asimov’s robots obviously could evaluate good and evil.


18 posted on 08/07/2007 3:28:56 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Roomba Violates All Three Laws Of Roombotics April 14, 2007

CHARLOTTE, NC—A top-of-the-line, third-generation Roomba Scheduler robotic floor-cleaning vacuum purchased in January by 35-year-old claims adjuster Ken Graney has inexplicably broken all three laws of Roombotics, a simple yet vital protocol programmed into every Roomba by its manufacturer, iRobot....

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

19 posted on 08/07/2007 10:05:51 AM PDT by Rameumptom (Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson