Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Laser Printers Could be Health Hazards
Madison.com ^ | August 2, 2007 | Anit Weier

Posted on 08/02/2007 2:24:44 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

Your office laser printer may be hazardous to your health.

That's because some printers emit large quantities of very fine particles that can be breathed into the lungs, according to a study by Australian researchers at the International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health at the Queensland University of Technology.

"The health effects from inhaling ultra-fine particles depend on particle composition, but the results can range from respiratory irritation to more severe illness such as cardiovascular problems or cancer," professor Lidia Morawska, one of the researchers, said in a news release from the university.

The researchers found that particulate matter levels were higher during the work day inside an air-conditioned nonsmoking office building in Brisbane than outside near a roadway. They soon zeroed in on laser printers as culprits, and tested 62 throughout the six-story building over a 48-hour period.

Forty percent of the printers tested emitted tiny particles, and 27 percent of those were high-emitters. A follow-up test of some printers found that particle emissions started as soon as a printer started operating.

Particle emissions varied depending on the type of printer and age of the printer and cartridge, but the highest printer particle emitting rate was close to that of a prior test of cigarette smoking in a residential home, the study said.

Robert Hamers, UW-Madison chemistry department chairman, who is associate director of the UW's Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center, said the study is important.

"Laser printers can be a significant source of particle emissions and could potentially be a health risk," he said, but added that comparing printer emissions to cigarette smoke was not valid because the particles are made up of entirely different things.

"This study does not show in any convincing way that it is comparable to cigarette smoke. This study is based on the number of particles, but the kinds of particles are quite different," Hamers said. "Cigarette smoke contains polyaromatic hydrocarbons and cyanide and other materials. Emissions from printers are more like soot."

Carbon emissions can be hazardous, however. Chimney sweeps used to get testicular cancer, and coal miners get black lung disease, Hamers said.

"This is certainly something that we need to do more investigation on," he added. "It is an important issue because there is a lot of evidence that particles in the air contribute to asthma and other health effects. But a lot of health effects can be dependent on the chemical composition of the particles."

Environmental testing for air quality focuses on particles that are about one-fiftieth the diameter of a human hair or less.

The nearest printer was about 13 feet from the testing device, which was a condensation particle counter.

Printers, not photocopiers, were the main source of particles.

Of 42 printer models tested, 34 were manufactured by Hewlett-Packard, so that company's printers made up almost all of the high-emission printers. According to the study, high-emission laser printers were: HP Color LaserJet 4650dn, HP Color LaserJet 5550dtn, HP Color LaserJet 8550N, HP LaserJet 1320N, HP LaserJet 1320n, HP LaserJet 2420dn, HP LaserJet 4200dtn, HP LaserJet 4250n, HP LaserJet 5(a), HP LaserJet 8000N, HP LaserJet 8150N and Toshiba Studio 450.

Hewlett-Packard could not be reached for comment prior to deadline, but a company spokeswoman told the San Francisco Chronicle that HP has been working with scientists to study emissions, but hasn't been able to determine the chemical composition of emissions or their source in the printing system.

"HP believes that all laser printers emit nanoparticles to one degree or another," Emily Horn told the Chronicle.

Hamers noted that the study did not answer whether the printer or the toner cartridge was the source of the emissions.

"Sometimes you can get high-capacity toner cartridges or low-capacity cartridges for the same printer. It was not clear if emission differences were due to printer design or the cartridge itself. This study raises more questions than it solves, but that is the mark of a good study. You have to follow it up," Hamers said.

The researchers reporting the study were Morawska, Congrong He and Len Taplin. The study was financed by the Queensland Department of Public Works. Morawska said the study highlighted a need for governments to regulate particle emissions from laser printers. "Governments regulate emissions levels from outdoor devices such as vehicles, power stations and factories, so why not for printers?" she asked.

She suggested that people place printers in well-ventilated areas of offices and homes to allow airborne particles to disperse.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: health; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: hunter112

“...but nobody’s going to invent one until somebody figures out that there’s a possible problem.”

You mean as in all those millions of dollars that are flowing into Algore’s coffers because Global Warming “might present a possible problem?” ;)

Keep an eye on this. The more your Government regulates you, especially “for your own good” the less free you will be.


21 posted on 08/02/2007 2:59:45 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mark

See Post 21. Great Minds, LOL! :)


22 posted on 08/02/2007 3:00:22 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"we all will probably die with something sooner or later." J.Elders
23 posted on 08/02/2007 3:03:23 PM PDT by steveo (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Yep, we need the “oh geez” guy on this one!
24 posted on 08/02/2007 3:24:55 PM PDT by SoftballMominVA (Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
the study highlighted a need for governments to
regulate particle emissions from laser printers.

"Governments regulate emissions levels from outdoor
devices such as vehicles, power stations and factories,
so why not for printers?" she asked.


good grief!
25 posted on 08/02/2007 3:27:26 PM PDT by leda (19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Getting out of bed could be hazardous to your health-—not getting out of bed could be hazardous to your health as well..........


26 posted on 08/02/2007 3:32:26 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

We are all gonna die from somethin (to quote Joselyn Elders) and remember, every second you live, you are a second closer to death.


27 posted on 08/02/2007 3:34:01 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA
You mean this guy?


28 posted on 08/02/2007 3:50:45 PM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: leda
good grief!

Perfect phrase.

29 posted on 08/02/2007 3:52:02 PM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; Gabz

thanks, bfl


30 posted on 08/02/2007 4:10:31 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I’m done for then—I had a HP laser printer by my computer for a whole lotta years at the office. I still own that one. Gotta die of something, I guess. Gloom and doom...


31 posted on 08/02/2007 4:15:08 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Living is hazardous to your health—heh heh, if you’re doing it right.


32 posted on 08/02/2007 4:17:00 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

I’ve been trying to set my Laser Printer to “Kill.”

It’s stuck on the “Stune” setting.

:-(


33 posted on 08/02/2007 4:19:04 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

“Gotta die of something, I guess.”

I wanna die in the arms of my ‘Cabana Boy’ of natural causes when I’m about 95 or so. ;)


34 posted on 08/02/2007 4:19:54 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
STOP GLOBAL PRINTING!!!

If Al Gore hadn't invented the internet we wouldn't be using all these computers right now!

35 posted on 08/02/2007 4:22:24 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

LIFE is a health hazard!


36 posted on 08/02/2007 4:25:59 PM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

“I’ve been trying to set my Laser Printer to ‘Kill.’ It’s stuck on the ‘Stune’ setting.”

LOL!


37 posted on 08/02/2007 5:25:52 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

That’s what I used to say, only Cabana Boy meant my 25 year old lover. Ain’t ever gonna happen but it was fun to think about it waaayyyy back then.


38 posted on 08/02/2007 5:33:58 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Wilco.


39 posted on 08/02/2007 5:46:46 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Oh for crying out loud. I thought the title was “laser pointer could be health hazard”

I was reading very enthusiastically when I got to the part about laser pointers emitting very fine particles. I was fascinated about what those particles could be.

DOH!


40 posted on 08/02/2007 5:49:48 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson