Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sagging Pants May Have Contributed To Fatal Shooting
The Indy Channel ^ | 07/30/07

Posted on 07/30/2007 11:08:32 AM PDT by Abathar

GARY, Ind. -- A teenager shot to death by an officer as he fled a burglary scene may have tried to pull up his sagging pants, causing the officer to mistake the movement for a reach for a weapon, according to newly filed court documents.

In a motion to dismiss a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by Vincent Smith Jr.'s father, the city of Gary suggests the 16-year-old was shot as he was reaching down to hoist up his drooping pants and sprint away from Officer Levi Randolph.

"Police officers have to make a lot of split-second decisions," said city attorney Donald Levinson. "The law does not say you have to wait until someone shoots at you (to act)."

The city's motion includes photographs of Smith's body, his underwear clearly riding above his jean's sagging waist, laying in the alley behind a house he was apparently burglarizing.

Randolph, who was indicted in March for the Jan. 15 shooting, faces up to eight years in prison if convicted in the killing.

The officer claims he thought Smith was reaching to pull a gun as the teen walked out the back door of the house. Randolph said he fired at Smith but missed when the teen reached toward his pants before sprinting through the backyard.

Randolph said that after Smith scaled an 8-foot fence and dropped to the ground, he turned toward the pursuing officer and again reached into his pants. Randolph fired again and struck Smith behind the left ear, killing him instantly.

In both cases, Levinson suggests in his filing that Smith was gathering up his sagging pants in anticipation of sprinting away.

Low-hanging pants that wearers must frequently hoist have become a hip-hop fashion statement popularized by rappers. Sagging pants are said to have their roots in prison culture, where inmates were often issued ill-fitting pants and belts were banned.

Douglas Hobson, an attorney for Vincent Smith Sr., said police training should better prepare officers to make split-second judgments to prevent shooting suspects who pose no threat.

"You've got to know there is a gun or something that is going to hurt someone. If these kinds of excuses justify something like that, then we've got a long way to go," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; cleanunderwear; donutwatch; fashionstatement; thuglife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: TexasCajun

Last month, I saw a guy in charleston wv skateboarding down a street while holding up his big pants with the other hand.

I swear, I laughed so hard I almost peed on myself.


81 posted on 07/30/2007 12:19:03 PM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I still think you would need to see the exit wound to tell exactly where he was facing to the shooter myself. If it exited behind the right ear, perhaps taking out the spine for an instantaneous kill all the guy had to do was turn his head or just start to twist his body for that to happen.

1)I am under the impression there was no exit wound.

2)It would be virtually impossible for the officer to have fired when the perp was facing him, but the perp was able to turn his head and make other movements before the bullet got there. Think about this for a second: The officer surely fired at the center of mass. So, this perp would have had made some sort of movement that put his head more in the area where center of mass would be, and turn his head really, really fast.

Either that, or the cop's not good with his gun. Or he shot the guy running away.

Of the three scenarios, which is more likely?

Look, If I caught someone in my house robbing it, I probably shoot with no questions asked. But I can't chase a guy down and shoot him when he's fleeing. Cops can't either. The only difference is that they can chase and say "I thought he had a gun" if they shoot the perp and it looks a little funny.

Maybe its all as the officer says. Maybe extraordinary circmstances and random chance occurred and the guy did turn his head really, really quickly. Its just a little hard to go with that option.
82 posted on 07/30/2007 12:26:34 PM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
As you've probably read on this thread, there are a lot of explanations for baggy pants--probably some urban myths included.

Personally have heard that it comes from prisons where belts aren't allowed so that prisoners don't hang themselves (or others) or garret people. If the pants they issue you are too big, then they'll tend to sag.

83 posted on 07/30/2007 12:26:37 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

http://www.snopes.com/risque/homosex/sagging.asp


84 posted on 07/30/2007 12:33:55 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Really depends on angle of entry, but it is perfectly possible to shoot someone from the front and have an angled intry into the skull behind the ear, especially if the perp was starting turn his head even slightly, beginning to scan for which direction to run. Behind the ear doesn’t necesarily mean in the crease behind the ear.


85 posted on 07/30/2007 12:45:39 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("I know the fittest have not survived when I watch Congress on CSPAN.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

Backwards ballcaps, another sign of stupidity that crosses all race lines.
__________________________________________________________

Or of a neck that is getting red.


86 posted on 07/30/2007 12:47:15 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
” Behind the ear doesn’t necessarily mean in the crease behind the ear.”

I know, but it sounds more like he was turning to run ( again) or was running away.

Either way it doesn’t look good for the cop’s credibility and/or judgment.

87 posted on 07/30/2007 12:53:27 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

There should be a law that all would-be criminals be provided a government-issued belt, so that police can’t mistake their pulling their pants up for pulling a gun. They have a right to be treated fairly./s


88 posted on 07/30/2007 12:59:58 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I do not know where saggin started but having been around the local police “a lot” I know that some drug dealers keep their stash in a pocket in the sag. Some pants even have a false crotch sewn in.

They also have been known to carry their firearms there as some police are hesitant to search the crotch. Also as one poster here noted the scum also booby trap the crotch.

My thought is “Another one bites the dust!!!!!!”


89 posted on 07/30/2007 1:16:12 PM PDT by jdietz ("There's small Revenge in Words, but Words may be greatly revenged" Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Can’t bring myself to show any sympathy for the alleged britches puller.


90 posted on 07/30/2007 1:17:54 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Don’t mess with the fashion police.


91 posted on 07/30/2007 1:22:28 PM PDT by Hacklehead (God, Guns, Guts and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Made America Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998; Chieftain

That is fantastic! You are poet and don’t know it!!!Terrific...LOL>


92 posted on 07/30/2007 1:39:37 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (The truth about men who watch or set up dogfights.......they can't get it up !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

““Depends on where the exit wound is. If it was behind the other ear then it’s ok, if it came out his right eye socket then there may be some questions to answer. I think if that was the case the lawyer would have been all over that point in court.”

There is still no way to shoot someone facing you behind the ear, even from the side.

Possible scenario:

The badguy jumps the fence, faces the officer, reaches to pull up his trousers and begins turning to the right to continue his flight. Depending on how the officer was trained to shoot, a headshot may have been indicated (immediate threat indicator ie a draw stroke). If the officer targeted the head and the badguy was turning as the shot broke, he could have taken the hit behind the left ear.


93 posted on 07/30/2007 1:40:25 PM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

In teens that have never seen fieldwork, I mean. No slam on hard working Southerners implied.


94 posted on 07/30/2007 1:49:50 PM PDT by 50sDad (Angels on asteroids are abducting crop circles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U; Abathar

There is still no way to shoot someone facing you behind the ear, even from the side.


Remember the MSM is telling you this information. If the MSM tells me the sun is rising I still look out the window to verify.

They’re the people who put the “fake” in “fake but accurate.”


95 posted on 07/30/2007 2:12:05 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Kudo’s .. that’s great


96 posted on 07/30/2007 2:30:56 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Nah, he could have been turning at the exact moment the officer fired.

People need to stop the armchair quarterbacking unless there obvious misalignments between the officer’s story and the angle of entry. Sloppy reporting isn’t one of them.


97 posted on 07/30/2007 2:42:41 PM PDT by Valpal1 ("I know the fittest have not survived when I watch Congress on CSPAN.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

“No, but the cop’s story doesn’t make sense and if used in court he will likely lose.”

Goblin looks at cop, pulls pants up to run, cop believes he’s going for a weapon, cop aims-prepares to fire, goblin turns to run again just as cop squeezes trigger, cop has no reflex time to slack off on trigger, goblin learns stupidity can be a capital offense in the real world.


98 posted on 07/30/2007 6:54:36 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I’m one of the first people on FR to jump on stories about bad cops. But having watched enough episodes of COPS and getting tired of seeing too much underwear I can really see where the officer would err on the side of use of deadly force.

I’m with you...no tears here.

99 posted on 07/30/2007 6:59:33 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Cindy Sheehan for Congress! Because...well...just because!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Punk needed galluses.


100 posted on 07/30/2007 7:00:38 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson