Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Federal) Judge Strikes Down Hazleton's Illegal Immigrant Law
Yahoo! News ^ | 7/26/2007 | Michael Rubinkam

Posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:07 AM PDT by Pyro7480

ALLENTOWN, Pa. (AP) -- A federal judge on Thursday struck down the city of Hazleton's tough immigration law, which has been emulated by cities around the country. The Illegal Immigration Relief Act sought to impose fines on landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and deny business permits to companies that give them jobs. Another measure would have required tenants to register with City Hall and pay for a rental permit.

It was pushed by Hazleton's Republican mayor last summer after two illegal immigrants were charged in a fatal shooting.

Hispanic groups and illegal immigrants sued in federal court to overturn the measures, saying they usurp the federal government's exclusive power to regulate immigration, deprive residents of their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process, and violate state and federal housing law.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: aliens; criminalaliens; greedyslumlords; hazleton; illegalimmigrants; immigrantlist; immigration; judiciary; pennsylvania; propertyrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last
To: Pyro7480

Damn!


21 posted on 07/26/2007 11:08:07 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The federal government does virtually nothing about illegal immigration. So that’s why some places like Hazleton have been passing local laws dealing with it. And then a judge comes along and strikes it down.

I would love to see something like this go to the Supreme Court. The thing is : these are people here illegally in the first place, under federal law. A local law saying it’s illegal to rent to people who are here illegally does not contradict the federal law.

I will be eager to hear the reasoning of the federal judge in this opinion as to why it’s not legal to have a local law that ties in with the federal law.

Legal decisions like this erode respect for law and order. It appears like the judges are making up the law as they go along.


22 posted on 07/26/2007 11:08:17 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Rush is discussing this right this very minute! Freepers doing Rush’s ‘Show Prep’ again, LOL!


23 posted on 07/26/2007 11:08:38 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14
I think we may have to take our country back by force.

The Powers-That-Be are not going to do it.

24 posted on 07/26/2007 11:08:47 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (RIP Eric Medlen. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Not surprising. Cities that try these laws clearly do not have the legal authority to enact such laws. Such laws do not and will not do anything to solve the illegal immigration problem anyway. The cities that passed these more likely than not know they will be struck down.


25 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:01 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
(D)

Why else would they not print it? If it was a Republican it owuld have benn in the title.

26 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:11 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Criticizing, not criticizeing


27 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:23 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Sounds to me like we should then be able to sue these La Raza style groups under RICO.

As a matter of fact The Federal Immigration And Nationality Act says you can. Read the RICO section.

Excerpts from the U.S. legal code referring to hiring illegal aliens.*

Federal Immigration and Nationality Act

Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens Enforcement RICO —Citizen Recourse Tax Crimes Comment

Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an illegal alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each illegal alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."

Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):

A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:

· assists an illegal alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or · encourages that illegal alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or · knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions. ·

Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime. Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his or her work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens

It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an illegal alien for a fee, knowing the illegal alien is unauthorized to work in the United States. It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an illegal alien knowing that the illegal alien is unauthorized to work.

It is unlawful to hire any individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements. Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with three days' advance notice, the forms must be made available for inspection. Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home. "Day laborers" or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law. An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verification of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the illegal alien labor.

The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements. If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.

An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts. Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer's work force. Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual's accent or foreign appearance.

Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien work force of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.

It is illegal for nonprofit or religious organizations to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, regardless of claims that their convictions require them to assist illegal aliens. Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment. It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to five years.

Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens

It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any illegal alien who is in the United States in violation of law. Harboring means any conduct that tends to substantially facilitate an alien to remain in the U.S. illegally. The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally but has since lost his legal status.

An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien's illegal employment. Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they are illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien's entry or residence is in violation of the law. This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that "encouraging" includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious errors. The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities without delay upon entry to the U.S.

The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years' imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to twenty years' imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death of any person, the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored. A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the illegal alien smuggled qualifies as a victim under the Victim and Witness Protection Act. Conspiracy to commit crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years' imprisonment.

Enforcement

A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time, and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third-party complaints that have a reasonable probability of validity. Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.

State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is no extant federal limitation on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws. Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous, or erratic behavior; dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship; and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient. Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer's consent to enter workplaces or residences. Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or used as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.

RICO —Citizen Recourse

Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire to or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes, under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO). The pattern of racketeering activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO enterprise can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can include nonprofit associations.

Tax Crimes

Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or Social Security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or Social Security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions. U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than three employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice. In addition to the federal statutes summarized, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

Comment:

A comment and a published quote by Robert Gaffney, Attorney and County Executive of Suffolk County, LI, NY:

The statutory foundation of United States immigration law has always been the jurisdiction of the federal government, Congress and the federal courts. The preeminent laws concerning the employment of illegal aliens are found in the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §~ 1101-1503), as amended by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 CIRCA).

The law states it is a crime to assist an illegal alien who lacks employment authorization by referring him to an employer, or by acting as his or her employer, or as an agent for an employer. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) (Lexis 1997). Furthermore, it is unlawful to hire an individual for employment without complying with the employment eligibility requirements for every person hired. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324a(a)(l)(B) (Lexis 1997). Moreover, conduct tending substantially to facilitate illegal aliens remaining in the United States illegally, where there is knowledge or a reckless disregard of an illegal alien s unlawful status, is a crime, with escalating penalties, encompassed within the provisions of 1324. 8 U.S.C.S. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii) (Lexis 1997); United States v. Kim. 193 F-3d 567 (2d Cir. 1999), are considered employees for purposes of immigration law.
28 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:27 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Vision
From the MSNBC story:

"U.S. District Judge James Munley ruled that landlords, tenants and businesses that cater to Hispanics faced "irreparable harm" from the laws and issued a temporary restraining order blocking their enforcement."

29 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:47 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Illegals right to vote and run for office is just around the corner.

Recently there was an article where the goverment is suing a town because they don't have enough 'hispanics' in public office to suit them.

30 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:54 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

31 posted on 07/26/2007 11:10:25 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Now we know which way the Federal Government is going with this...We have been sold out by our own politicians...Imagine our Government has gone against it’s own people....
There goes the Neighborhood folks! there goes the Republican Party too!


32 posted on 07/26/2007 11:11:21 AM PDT by Old Phone Man (ks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Illegals right to vote and run for office is just around the corner.

It's already here, it's called Motor/Voter.

33 posted on 07/26/2007 11:12:01 AM PDT by fella ( newspapers used habitually to poison the public opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

U.S. District Judge James Munley declared it unconstitutional Thursday and voided it based on evidence and testimony from a nine-day trial held in March.

The city will almost certainly appeal.


34 posted on 07/26/2007 11:12:07 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14

If there is anymore decisions like this one, expect the “angry backlash” to become very explosive.


35 posted on 07/26/2007 11:12:31 AM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: facedown

Judge Munley is a Clinton appointee.


36 posted on 07/26/2007 11:13:32 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
Cities that try these laws clearly do not have the legal authority to enact such laws

From where do you find this "clarity?

37 posted on 07/26/2007 11:13:53 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

Well, hopefully those companies with illegals working for them will find some local “red tape” for their business licenses.

This is disgusting. We have an oligarchy of men in black robes telling the stupid masses what is best for them. When younger, I had a lot of respect for the legal profession — now I know better.


38 posted on 07/26/2007 11:14:38 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Judge Munley is a Clinton appointee.

I'm shocked.

39 posted on 07/26/2007 11:14:44 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
"..deprive residents of their constitutional rights and equal protection..."That should have gotten the suit thrown out. Why do the courts keep acting like these illegals have constitutional rights?

vaudine

40 posted on 07/26/2007 11:15:20 AM PDT by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson