Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assembly asks state police to consider Remington firearm products
Little Falls Times (NY) ^ | 7/17/07 | n/a

Posted on 07/17/2007 9:50:26 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

HERKIMER — Assemblyman Marc Butler, R,C,I - Newport, has called on the New York State Police to consider Remington firearms products in the performance of their duties.

Butler said he understands the state police is evaluating its long-term needs in terms of some of the weapons they will use in the future. He said he wanted to be sure Remington’s name will be included in the mix, and has received assurances from the state police that Remington will be considered. Butler pointed out that Remington has a long history in New York, hires Mohawk Valley residents and pays taxes in New York.

“I would therefore suggest that the New York State Police give Remington an opportunity to either bid or supply our state’s troopers with the tactical rifles and other types of rifles and long guns they require in the performance of their duties, Butler wrote to Fulton.

“It makes supreme sense to me, all things being equal, to give this opportunity to a company that operates within New York’s borders, pays taxes and expenses here, and most importantly, hires several hundred workers.”

In response, Felton wrote a letter to Remington Arms that he was familiar with the “fine products” that Remington manufactures and has reviewed the company’s product catalogue. He said that there are no short-term plans to buy patrol rifles or shotguns, but that the agency is now reviewing its long-term firearms needs.

“In the future, we will be more than willing to thoroughly examine your firearms products for potential purchase,” Felton wrote.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; newyork; police; remington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 07/17/2007 9:50:29 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

WOW! An Assembly man doing his job!


2 posted on 07/17/2007 9:54:29 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"the tactical rifles and other types of rifles and long guns they require".

Now, HERE is a man who knows the lingo! /sarcasm

3 posted on 07/17/2007 9:54:48 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Why the sarcasm?


4 posted on 07/17/2007 9:57:08 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

No difference (that I know of) between “rifles” and “long guns”


5 posted on 07/17/2007 9:58:19 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
A government taxes you out of hard earned money at the point of a gun you paid for that’s imported from a foreign country thus depriving the taxed a job which allows them to pay the taxes in the first place?

Is this how murrrica is functioning now?

6 posted on 07/17/2007 10:00:49 AM PDT by Weeedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

“This is my rifle this is my “long” gun”?”


7 posted on 07/17/2007 10:01:59 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Impeach Hillary 08')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Weeedley
A government taxes you out of hard earned money at the point of a gun you paid for that’s imported from a foreign country thus depriving the taxed a job which allows them to pay the taxes in the first place? Is this how murrrica is functioning now?

Now, is that any way to embrace the global economy or diversity?

8 posted on 07/17/2007 10:06:45 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

He was referring to shotguns, I’m sure.


9 posted on 07/17/2007 10:07:02 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

I sound so out of touch; don’t I?


10 posted on 07/17/2007 10:07:52 AM PDT by Weeedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Most agencies I know of, including mine, use the Remington 870.


11 posted on 07/17/2007 10:09:01 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Run, Fred run! I will send my donation as soon as you announce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

A Rifle is a Rifle. A long gun can be a rifle or a SHOTGUN.
Shotguns, generally, are not rifled. Non-rifled muzzle loaders are also considered long-guns.
So yes, there are long-guns that are not Rifles.
:)


12 posted on 07/17/2007 10:10:26 AM PDT by Havok (I like meat, guns, and comic books. Am I a bad conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

The Rem 700 action with accurized barrel is a reasonably priced product for swat and those who wish to reach out and touch somebody.


13 posted on 07/17/2007 10:10:31 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Havok

I’d add that a rifle can be a carbine and a carbine in some circles would not be considered a long gun


14 posted on 07/17/2007 10:11:44 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

at least he didn’t say “assault weapons” :)


15 posted on 07/17/2007 10:12:11 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (Stop repeat offenders. Don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
Oh, behave!


16 posted on 07/17/2007 10:12:19 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Weeedley

You’ll probably one of those that will kick up a fuss when the UN mandates the biometric identification chip plan to be implemented.


17 posted on 07/17/2007 10:13:53 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HockeyPop

Yes, they are. I’ve had the opportunity (as a civilian) to shoot the military sniper version, and it was quite handy at hitting targets at 300 meters with no problem. That was the max limit of the range we were on, so we couldn’t try it any further out.


18 posted on 07/17/2007 10:14:30 AM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

I shall whittle it clean out of my flesh with a bowie knife clasped in my cold dead fingers.


19 posted on 07/17/2007 10:15:56 AM PDT by Weeedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HockeyPop

i must have a bad 700. i have one in .223 that doesn’t impress me one bit. 3/4” is the best i can do with it, about 1” is average for it. my AR15 shoots a bit better (when i have a scope on it, 1/2”) my savage in .308 also shoots under 1/2”- and i paid $75 less for it.
my 870 OTOH is the best shotgun i’ve ever shot. 1 shot, 1 kill on all but 1 deer i’ve shot with it.


20 posted on 07/17/2007 10:17:10 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (Stop repeat offenders. Don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson