Posted on 07/11/2007 8:07:38 PM PDT by monomaniac
LOS ANGELES, July 11, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The leading Democratic presidential candidates will hold a televised debate to determine which one candidate will best represent and promote the interests of the homosexual agenda.
Sens. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards and Chris Dodd have agreed to participate in the debate, which portends to become a spectacle of one-upmanship as to which candidate is the most pro-homosexual.
The debate is scheduled in Los Angeles for August 9 at 9PM EST and is sponsored by Viacom's homosexual television network LOGO and the Human Rights Council (HRC), the most influential lobby of homosexual activists in the United States.
These four Democratic candidates will discuss a range of homosexual issues including gay "marriage", civil unions, discrimination based on sexual orientation, homosexuals in the military, hate crimes, HIV/AIDS etc.
On support for the homosexual agenda, there is little difference among the Democratic presidential candidates. Sens. Clinton, Obama, Edwards, and Dodd along with other Democratic contenders responded to an HRC questionnaire in which they outline their support for a number of homosexual issues including federal recognition of same-sex unions, the employment non-discrimination act (ENDA), hate crimes legislation, recognizing same-sex couples as having equal status with married couples, and gay "adoption." (http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/Questionnaire_ReportCard.pdf)
Both Obama and Clinton have taken positions that would open the door for gay "marriage", while only two long shot candidates - Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gavel - have directly called for same-sex "marriage." Obama, the chief threat to Clinton's presidential aspirations, advocated the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) during his 2004 Senate race. Clinton herself has called for repealing DOMA by rejecting the central plank of the law - signed by her husband and former President Bill Clinton - which defines "marriage" as "only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and "spouse" as "a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife."
The debate, however, is most likely to become a showcase for Sen. Hillary Clinton both on account of her well-established ties with HRC and her efforts to persuade homosexual activists to accept her as their leader in the United States.
Earlier this March, Sen. Clinton gave the keynote address for the Human Rights Council in which she praised the defeat of the Federal Marriage Amendment and spoke enthusiastically of the "agenda we are pursuing."
Clinton told activists then, "Just as you always have an open door to my Senate office you will have an open door to the White House. And together we will continue our struggle."
See the HRC questionnaire detailing the Democratic candidates' stance on homosexual issues: http://a4.g.akamai.net/f/4/19675/0/newmill.download.akamai.com/19677/anon.newmediamill/pdfs/Questionnaire_ReportCard.pdf
See related coverage by LifeSiteNews.com:
"When I am President " - Hilary Clinton Promises Pro-homosexual Administration http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jun/07060407.html
Hillary Clinton Supported by Big Abortion, Gay Activists and Now the Porn Industry http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07041906.html
Hillary Clinton Addresses Gay Activists - Identified as Leader of Gay Activist Leaders http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/mar/07030507.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Headline of the Day.
I think Edwards is a lesbian.
You can’t make this stuff up. Republicans ought to make millions of DVDs of this debate to mail out.
They’re all going to come out, I betcha!
oh, talk about pandering.
Here’s one case where I think they can all be winners.
My thoughts exactly!
My vote is on Edwards.
This NEEDS TO BE VERY WELL PUBLICIZED, AIRED LIVE, AND TAPED for Replay unendingly when they assert that they stand for Family values and morals.
Then the Dems will not even be able to get elected Town Garbage-Collector, much less anything higher.
Of course. Does there really need to be any debate?
It will be a photo finish!
IMHO all of the Dimocrat candidates are “Gay”, as well as a number of the Republican ones too. And, I do not mean this in a nice way either.
At first I thought this was a scrappleface article.
Of course the democrats have a sodomite soul. But this is dirty linen. Its not the sort of sh-t they want to air in public.
The democrats are gone. All their candidates are going to look like they’re from the dept of silly walks. In fact, now I think understand the department of silly walks better.
This is definitely right up there with promising to raise taxes.
There will be sound bites produced here that that will play for years —if not decades.
What did duvall say “I love the smell of napalm in the morning” The dems are faggoting themselves.
Aw, jeepers, don't disregard this piece of shame...Hot4HILL
But I never expected the Spanish Inquisition! :)
In fact, now I think understand the department of silly walks better.
But I never expected the Spanish Inquisition! :)
//////////////
Well actually there is an immense amount of hollywood homo money going to the dems. They have been burned before. They do want to make sure that once their pols are bought — that they will stay bought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.