Skip to comments.
Trophy wife at 1600? (Thompson and Presidential Younger Brides)
World Net Daily ^
| 7-09-07
| Doug Powers
Posted on 07/09/2007 9:52:26 AM PDT by Bladerunnuh
Fred Thompson is going to present a problem for a mainstream media that is used to reporting on political candidates who enjoy the affections of younger women just as long as their wives don't find out.
The media isn't quite sure how to handle a man who has a comprehensive past with the ladies, is probably running for office and yet isn't busy herding more illicit humps into his closet than an Abu Dhabi camel smuggler with the cops banging on the front door.
Back in his single days, Thompson date
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fredthompson; jerikehn; jerithompson; potus; thompson; trophy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-468 next last
To: Petronski
What you call “petty prudishness” used to be called “modesty.” Oh well.
To: herMANroberts
i will not lower myself to use the word ta-tas, good grief!!!
42
posted on
07/09/2007 10:17:23 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: Bladerunnuh
According to the Times, Fred Thompson is close to smashing through a barrier a "glass ceiling" if you will, that has yet to be broken in the more than two-century history of the United States presidency. This is with the possible exception of Dolley Madison, who was 17 years younger than James. Age differential aside, a woman who ends up with snack cakes named in her honor is a trophy indeedWell good to see WND is still lacking in their historical knowledge (among other things)....President John Tyler was in his 50s when he married his second wife who was in her early 20s, while he was in office. About a 30 year difference. The First Lady for two years was under 25 years old.
43
posted on
07/09/2007 10:17:51 AM PDT
by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: xsmommy
No one wants lower ta tas!
To: Bladerunnuh
Fred Thompson has more class in his little finger than the author of this tacky tabloid story.
45
posted on
07/09/2007 10:19:56 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Action speaks louder than words but not nearly as often.)
To: lady lawyer
What you call “modesty” implies to me something “burqhish.”
46
posted on
07/09/2007 10:19:57 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
To: Bladerunnuh
Hardly a Trophy. Trophies don’t give birth to cute babies.
47
posted on
07/09/2007 10:19:58 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(NO Shamnesty!!!)
To: lady lawyer
That’ll get the vote of a lot of red-blooded conservative males.
Ta-Ta!
48
posted on
07/09/2007 10:20:44 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(NO Shamnesty!!!)
To: xsmommy
i will not lower myself to use the word ta-tas, good grief!!!Then I guess the word "boobulage" is right out.
49
posted on
07/09/2007 10:21:06 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
To: angelcindy
What about Kuninich n his wife thats 30 myrs younger than him... From the article
As long as Dennis Kucinich doesn't stage a Doug Flutie-esque comeback, Fred Thompson would indeed be the first president in modern times with what will constantly be billed as a "trophy wife." The media is bound to, with incessant overanalysis and numerous Freudian slips, pose two questions: 1) "Is it good for the country?" and 2) "Why can't we get one?"
50
posted on
07/09/2007 10:21:18 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(take my governor, please)
To: NeoCaveman
Ku-Ku’s wife is hot! I love redheads.
51
posted on
07/09/2007 10:21:59 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(NO Shamnesty!!!)
To: Petronski
Jeri Thompson's....
Is her last name Thompson? I read a couple of places she did not take his last name when they married.
52
posted on
07/09/2007 10:23:13 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
To: Petronski
53
posted on
07/09/2007 10:23:23 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(NO Shamnesty!!!)
To: lady lawyer
Oh. Youre right. Those of you who disagree with me do so because you are infinitely smarter and deeper. Well, on the one hand, you have people who can differentiate between the way a woman has dressed in the past at Hollywood type events and the way a woman is dressing now that she is in a position to be our next first lady.
On the other hand, we have you, who is seemingly unable to differentiate between the two.
54
posted on
07/09/2007 10:23:48 AM PDT
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(Well Fred’s got a 60-40 lead. I intend to change that -- pissant)
To: ZULU
She certainly is pretty, but once she opens her mouth-- wow. She's stark raving mad.
To: herMANroberts
“No one wants lower ta tas!”
LOL!
Yeah, Hillery’s are in her pants ;-)
56
posted on
07/09/2007 10:24:00 AM PDT
by
Mrs.Z
To: NeoCaveman
and those protesting the loudest are either a) incapable of attracting one or b) enormously resentful of the fact that they could never pass for one, themselves, or perhaps lost a spouse to one in the past.
57
posted on
07/09/2007 10:24:03 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: elizabetty
I read a couple of places . . .Got a link?
I'll forward them to Mrs. Thompson.
58
posted on
07/09/2007 10:24:08 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
To: lady lawyer
In truth, I dont think its the age difference that will bother people so much as the fact that shes been photographed so much with her ta-tas hanging out to a degree that is unprecedented for first ladies. We just arent used to knowing that much about a first ladys ta-tas.TTIWWP.
59
posted on
07/09/2007 10:25:07 AM PDT
by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
No, I can differentiate. It is just a question of decorum. You either have it all the time, or you don’t.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 461-468 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson