Skip to comments.
Bush and Libby: The commutation is a profile in non-courage.
Opinion Journal (Wall Street Journal) ^
| July 3, 2007
Posted on 07/03/2007 8:29:20 AM PDT by EveningStar
President Bush's commutation late yesterday afternoon of the prison sentence of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby will at least spare his former aide from 2 1/2 years in prison. But by failing to issue a full pardon, Mr. Bush is evading responsibility for the role his Administration played in letting the Plame affair build into fiasco and, ultimately, this personal tragedy...
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; cialeak; commutation; libby; scooterlibby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: EveningStar
The neutral media is really showing their true agenda on this one.
2
posted on
07/03/2007 8:31:02 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
To: EveningStar
Bush has no stomach for fighting the Democrats. This issue shows just how ineffective his “new tone” has been during his entire presidency. He was right to at least commute the sentence, but he should have fought them tooth and nail behind the scenes so that they never got this far.
3
posted on
07/03/2007 8:31:31 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: EveningStar

The Nifongism show trial of Scooter Libby was the real travesty of justice. The shadow government lashing out by any means necessary.
4
posted on
07/03/2007 8:32:03 AM PDT
by
weegee
(If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
To: tobyhill
I'm inclined to agree with the article. Bush should have issued a full pardon to Libby, as his indictment ( proven phony by the revelation of Armitage being the "outer") and conviction on largely contrived evidence in a kangaroo court was an obscenity.
The commutation was a step in the right direction, but a full pardon was called for if only to stick a middle finger in Fitzfongs face.
5
posted on
07/03/2007 8:38:30 AM PDT
by
VR-21
To: weegee
Libby was convicted by a jury. If anyone should be blamed for this, it should be Libby’s stupid and overpriced lawyers who let this jury full of bozos and Democrat hacks get on in the first place.
To: EveningStar
To the WSJ, this is a failure in courage. To the WSJ, Bush’s support of amnesty was a profile in courage.
Pissant to the WSJ- go piss up a rope.
7
posted on
07/03/2007 8:39:14 AM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Congressman with pyschotic supporters)
To: EveningStar
help me out here:
1. William Jefferson Clinton committed perjury in his Monica Lewinsky testimony.
2. Scooter Libby was convicted of perjury in the Valerie Plame affair.
3. William Jefferson Clinton lost his law license.
4. Scooter Libby lost his law license.
5. William Jefferson Clinton was fined $250,000
6. Scooter Libby was fined $250,000
7. William Jefferson Clinton served no jail time for perjury.
8. Scooter Libby will serve no jail time.
9. William Jefferson Clinton is revered by the MSM.
10.Scooter Libby is despised by the MSM.... Fair and balanced journalism?
8
posted on
07/03/2007 8:43:14 AM PDT
by
meandog
(Bush--proving himself again and again to be the best friend the Dems have EVER had!)
To: VR-21
This is a start and allows Libby to clear his name on his own then if that doesn’t work out because of our divided country President Bush can give him the pardon as he’s walking out the door.
9
posted on
07/03/2007 8:44:34 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
To: SunStar
The “new tone” has done nothing but PO the base.
The Demmies are just as vitriolic as ever, and he has gained NOTHING with it.
Time for someone like Fred Thompson to step up and slap the left down by confronting them on every moonbat issue - through his press secretary, Ann Coulter.
10
posted on
07/03/2007 8:45:08 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: meandog
11
posted on
07/03/2007 8:50:20 AM PDT
by
lonestar67
(Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
To: EveningStar
I'm sure Libby appreciates avoiding the slammer, but he can't be happy with Bush's statement. Bush seems to accept the guilty verdict as legitimate, and the trial as having been an impartial affair.
It's almost as if Bush doesn't realize that the verdict was largely based on the jury's acceptance of Wilson's conspiracy theory, according to which Bush/Cheney deliberately lied about Iraq and set out to punish Wilson/Plame for telling the truth. It's hard for us to keep defending the administration when the administration won't defend itself.
12
posted on
07/03/2007 8:51:24 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: EveningStar
I think the WSJ was wrong about amnesty but right about this. Still, I appreciate the President’s action, even if it only went half way.
Does Scooter get his money back if he wins the appeal?
13
posted on
07/03/2007 8:52:23 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: weegee
This is one of the most important points to be made, all of the admin. officials who have cowered in silence and failed to set the record straight on Joe Wilson's lies, etc:
"As the event unfolded, it fell to Mr. Libby to defend the Administration against Mr. Wilson's original charge, with little public assistance or support from the likes of Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell or Stephen Hadley. In no small part because of these profiles in non-courage, it was Mr. Libby who found himself caught up in prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's hunt for the Plame leaker, which he and his masters at Justice knew from Day One to be State Department official Richard Armitage. As Mr. Fitzgerald's obsessive exercise ground forward, Mr. Libby got caught in a perjury net that we continue to believe trapped an innocent man who lost track of what he said, when he said it, and to whom."
It is one of the most pernicious aspects of Joe Wilson's dishonest jihad against the WH that serious officials who knew better had to choose between battling in the enemedia to set the record straight or concentrating on their jobs in time of war and letting Libby hang out to dry. No competent journalist or politician should be sitting back and allowing the travesties of misinformation sit out there unchallenged, but everyone who knows better has been cowed into silence by the enemedia.
14
posted on
07/03/2007 8:55:35 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: Steve_Seattle
"It's hard for us to keep defending the administration when the administration won't defend itself."
That's what leaves me shocked and appalled by the statement from Pres. Bush, though I'm certainly glad that an innocent Libby avoids jail time..... but how on earth can the WH give such an endorsement of the fairness of Fitzfong's "investigation" and sham trial???? Either key people in the WH don't know any better, which is frightening, or else they do know better but choose to pander to the delusions of the 'RATs and the MSM in giving credibility to this farce. Either way, it's a disaster for truth, justice, and the American Way!
15
posted on
07/03/2007 8:58:50 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
To: tobyhill
“The “neutral” media is really showing their true agenda on this one.”
They certainly are...especially after watching the WH press briefing with Tony Snow. How these people can even pretend to be be detached, objective journalists is beyond me.
On the contrary, every member of that press-corp acted as if they were “personally” offended and effected by this decision; instead of objective questioning, it looked like an inquisition.
Sadly, I just can’t ever recall any of this same consternation when Clinton, Burglar, Barry...or any other democrat for that fact, escaped the jaws of justice. Democrats have successfully criminalized politics—and more specifically, conservatism.
16
posted on
07/03/2007 8:59:41 AM PDT
by
cwb
(Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
To: EveningStar
I think what Bush did was to protect Libby’s right to appeal. If he’d pardoned him, the case would be moot.
Now Libby’s lawyers can continue the appeal and perhaps win his exoneration.
17
posted on
07/03/2007 9:00:17 AM PDT
by
wildbill
To: SunStar
Bush can take, but he can’t dish it out.
More importantly, he again demonstrates a disturbing lack of loyalty to those that should get it.
Any man that can’t, or won’t be loyal to those that deserve it, is worth nothing.
What makes this doubling galling is the fact that Bush is a lame duck who has already shot his wad on the amnesty bill. A pardon for Libby would have incurred no more political fallout than this commutation. Bush has no political capital to lose.
18
posted on
07/03/2007 9:01:10 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: MrB
Time for someone with NO ties to Rove to step up — there are 10 worthy candidates not joined at the hip with Rove.
19
posted on
07/03/2007 9:01:30 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
( Inhofe for Senate 08 -- Broken Glass Republican -- vote out the RATs in 2008)
To: VR-21
Know what's missing here, and has been for a LONG time? Where's W.'s outrage and genuine pissed-offness of a man wrongly convicted by a circus jury of trained seals being led by the bait feeder, fitz? This was obvious railroading by Fitz the Persecuter. And it deserved W. coming out the way he did after 9/11 with strength and DARING anyone to whine, bitch, moan and groan about his decision. Who dares to challenge him? Valerie Plume, Joe Wilson, Sandy Berger, Mark Rich, the FALN members? Bill Clinton? FEH. W. needs his mojo back. I want him pissed off, and fed up again. And at the RIGHT people.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson