If the head of Homeland Security says he can't enforce our laws... well... I'm speechless.......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: captjanaway
He’s a liar. “Can not” and “will not” are two different things.
2 posted on
07/01/2007 2:17:15 PM PDT by
LouAvul
To: captjanaway
If you can’t enforce American laws in America, what are we doing in Iraq?
3 posted on
07/01/2007 2:17:19 PM PDT by
Mamzelle
(We need a new, conservative chairman of the RNC first, because the elites are about to take revenge)
To: captjanaway
If Chertoff really believes this, he should resign and let someone else enforce the law.
4 posted on
07/01/2007 2:17:29 PM PDT by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
To: captjanaway
This is NOT rocket science, if they are here illegally they should be deported. What part of this does he not understand?
5 posted on
07/01/2007 2:17:44 PM PDT by
kjo
To: captjanaway
Fire this S.O.B.! And do it now! He is a danger to our country.
6 posted on
07/01/2007 2:17:51 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: captjanaway
We need a President who demands a “can do” attitude from his Cabinet officials. Not one who encourages a infectious, defeatist attitude.
7 posted on
07/01/2007 2:18:35 PM PDT by
Rb ver. 2.0
(The Republican party of today is the Whig party of the 1850's.)
To: captjanaway
It’s not the first time. About a year back he said it was too expensive to enforce the law. I think it’s time to disband his department and put the money into border control.
8 posted on
07/01/2007 2:18:37 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: captjanaway
It’s time for a new head of Homeland Insecurity.
9 posted on
07/01/2007 2:19:25 PM PDT by
Darnright
(Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before)
To: captjanaway
10 posted on
07/01/2007 2:19:41 PM PDT by
mgstarr
(KZ-6090 Smith W.)
To: captjanaway
If he can’t do the job, tell him to resign, and find someone with gonads that can!
To: captjanaway
How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from MexicoI Like Ike.
The Fiscal Cost of Low-Skill Immigrants to the U.S. Taxpayer
"Reform" must conform to the following principles:
- Anyone who enters this country illegally must be forever barred from legal residency, let alone citizenship.
- The right to obtain legal residency in the US must be fairly rationed among all the world's nations, and must not favor those who happen to have the geographic advantage of having their native country located near the US. Residency must be granted based on a variety of factors, with self-sufficiency, useful talents and/or knowledge, and other economic benefits to the US taking precedence over other considerations. Race (as opposed to nationality) should NOT be one of the factors considered, in any way at all.
- Taxpayers must not be responsibile for paying the bills of immigrants they cannot afford to pay themselves. The rate of new immigrants must be controlled so as to not overwhelm the capacity of our infrastructure to absorb the increased population pressures.
- Those born to parents neither of whom are US citizens must not automatically become US citizens.
- English must be mastered before citizenship is granted. Legal residency should require either mastery of English, or yearly enrollment in a semester-long course in English as a second language.
- And last, but not least: No reform is permissible until we prove we can a) remove the illegals who are here, and b) prevent new illegals from arriving.
16 posted on
07/01/2007 2:20:50 PM PDT by
sourcery
(Anthropogenic Global Warming: A convenient lie designed to establish socialism by fear and deception)
To: captjanaway
“We don’t really have the ability to enforce the law with respect to illegal work in this country in a way that’s truly effective.”
You lying bag of crap.
Another betrayal by the Bush administration.
18 posted on
07/01/2007 2:21:02 PM PDT by
dsc
(There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. Edmund Burke)
To: captjanaway
He means he doesn’t have sufficient budget. Unfunded mandates don’t go as far as they used to.
19 posted on
07/01/2007 2:21:13 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: captjanaway
Skeletor and just about every dept. head in Homeland Security are incompetent political hacks. Which shouldn't’t surprise us, since the Chief Incompetent Political Hack selected them.
21 posted on
07/01/2007 2:21:36 PM PDT by
attiladhun2
(Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
To: captjanaway
So if 10 million Americans suddenly decided not pay income taxes, the government would agree not to enforce the law?
Oh wait, that is Reveune to the State. Horsewhip the offenders.
23 posted on
07/01/2007 2:22:02 PM PDT by
weegee
(If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
To: captjanaway
It is difficult to determine which is the more incompetent, AG Alberto or HSD Sec Miguel.
==
Since Chertoff apparently can’t handle the job, maybe should seek retirement and resign.
26 posted on
07/01/2007 2:23:50 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: captjanaway
This is crazy!!! What about the terrorists???
27 posted on
07/01/2007 2:24:43 PM PDT by
angelcindy
(Where's the Fence?????)
To: captjanaway
I'm not speechless.
I think anyone who claims they cannot do their job better make a shopping list of what they need and get after it, or resign and let someone else do what they can/will not.
I heard that they are moving the DHS HQ to part of the (former) grounds of St Elizabeth's...Small wonder.
28 posted on
07/01/2007 2:24:57 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: captjanaway
"We don't really have the ability to enforce the law with respect to illegal work in this country in a way that's truly effective."Then we will elect people that can!
32 posted on
07/01/2007 2:25:51 PM PDT by
mdittmar
(May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
To: captjanaway
what if there were 12 million
terrorists in the country - would we enforce the laws then, or just run up the white flag?
33 posted on
07/01/2007 2:26:03 PM PDT by
Fitzcarraldo
(Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson