Skip to comments.
Conservatives for Rudy????? (Vanity)
Aussie Dasher
| 17 June 2007
| Aussie Dasher
Posted on 06/17/2007 3:28:57 AM PDT by Aussie Dasher
THe latest Free Republic poll shows 7.8% of FReepers and Lurkers supporting Rudy Giuliani for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008.
Rudy supports the killing of babies, gay marriage and massive gun 'control'. These are views he has never hidden.
Can somebody - anybody - please explain to me how any conservative can support a candidate with such views?
One would be too many - but 7.8%????
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; autocrat; conservatives; gop; julieannie; rudygiuliani; rudyisaliberal; stoprudynow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
To: Aussie Dasher
Haven’t we already gone over this? I’m just askin’ . . .
3
posted on
06/17/2007 3:38:26 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Scratch a RINO, and you'll find a global elitist beneath the surface.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Some will compromise their principals for an end goal, think of it as agreeing to rob a bank, walking out with a million dollars and then have to live with the fact someone got shot and killed during the process.
4
posted on
06/17/2007 3:40:23 AM PDT
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I know...but 7.8%???? Sheeesh!!!!
5
posted on
06/17/2007 3:40:36 AM PDT
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
6
posted on
06/17/2007 3:40:44 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: DCPatriot
It’ll be a bigger yawn if you have to choose between Rudy and Hitlery come November next year...
7
posted on
06/17/2007 3:42:31 AM PDT
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
No...I would vote for Daffy Duck over Hillary Clinton...so it won’t be a problem at all.
8
posted on
06/17/2007 3:49:32 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: DCPatriot
If Rudy gets the nomination, Daffy Duck would be a better candidate!
9
posted on
06/17/2007 3:52:10 AM PDT
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
Chalk the 7.8% up to campaign workers.
10
posted on
06/17/2007 3:53:05 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Aussie Dasher
If it came down to Hitlery and Satan Incarnate in the general election, I will heartily cast a vote for Lucifer and drag 10 friends, neighbors, coworkers, family members down to the polls to do likewise.
Hopefully it will not come down to that.
11
posted on
06/17/2007 3:54:05 AM PDT
by
AmericaUnited
(Fred Thompson - I trust Fred to do the right things)
To: Aussie Dasher
Frankly, I like Duncan Hunter the more I hear about him, but that's too little and few and far between he can get any word out on what he's about.
So right now, I'm in favor of Fred Thompson. He's saying the right things and obviously knows how to work the media. We need someone who knows how to get his message out. Good intentions are fine, the ability to express them and convince others is the piece most often missing. We need a communicator in the White House.
Fred does seem to be campaigning on uniting conservatives. What would people think about a Thompson/Hunter ticket? Imagine a 24 year run in the oval office, maybe it could happen?
12
posted on
06/17/2007 3:54:23 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Aussie Dasher
Can somebody - anybody - please explain to me how any conservative can support a candidate with such views? One would be too many - but 7.8%???? Are you forgetting that there are "social" conservatives and also "fiscal/governmental" conservatives, and sometimes a person is a conservative but not both?
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Haven’t we already gone over this? I’m just askin’ . . .I believe so and with more emotional ranting than was necessary. But whatever feeeeels good. Enjoy this thread anyway, all.
14
posted on
06/17/2007 3:58:13 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Aussie Dasher
Because they don’t want to see Hillary or Obama get in the White House.
To: Aussie Dasher; DCPatriot
Bugs would do a better job than Daffy.
16
posted on
06/17/2007 4:02:55 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Aussie Dasher
Easy..the FR polling software doesn’t automatically filter out those who have been banned from, or voluntarily left FR...
17
posted on
06/17/2007 4:04:34 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: luckystarmom
And Rudy is the only one who could win over them in the general, right? (/s)
18
posted on
06/17/2007 4:07:36 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Aussie Dasher
I dont want Rudy and dont understand those that do, but then I dont understand how any Democrat could want either of their front runners either.
Maybe the Hildabeast will be convicted of campaign fraud and locked up. Well: I can dream cant I?
19
posted on
06/17/2007 4:09:38 AM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(http://www.imwithfred.com/index.aspx)
To: Enosh
20
posted on
06/17/2007 4:11:16 AM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
