Posted on 05/30/2007 9:47:17 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Today's Financial Times headline ("Spitzer to Streamline Rules for Wall Street") is an example of government allowing good old Yankee free enterprise to become more competitive with other international challengers.
The Financial Times also contains additional evidence of increasing inflationary pressures and of interest rates around the world, particularly in the European Union (E.U).
Meanwhile, in face of growing inflationary evidence and increasing interest rates among our key competitors, our Fed has kept our rates on hold.
While it warns of inflation as its main concern, our Fed appears "frightened" to compete either against inflation or with the rising interest rates of other competing currencies, most notably the Euro, against which it has depreciated by 12.24% in under a year and by about a third in the past two years.
There is a legislative reason why our Fed understandably feels "frightened" and seemingly unwilling to do more that utter warnings of inflation.
In the old days, our country was the undisputed master of the world's economy and our mighty dollar was keenly held, often in preference to gold, as the crucial reserve of other competing nations.
From this dominant position, our past Congress was tempted to give our Fed not just the single mandate, of its competing international central banks, of controlling inflation, but a second (often competing contra) mandate of encouraging economic growth.
This government action made our Fed and thereby our currency, inherently uncompetitive, over the long term. The problem was not evident when our economy remained not just highly competitive but overridingly dominant around the world.
America was so dominant then that it is now hard to relate to in today's world.
When I worked as an investment banker at Morgan Stanley & Co (in the late 1960"s), the market capitalization of just one major U.S. company (IBM) was greater then the total capitalization of all the European Stock exchanges (excluding London) added together!
Today, after a series of Democrat Presidents and the luxurious, almost hedonistic, spread of liberalism in the U.S., the situation is very, very different.
The end of World War II allowed the countries of Europe to compete with the U.S.
The end of the Cold War opened free competition to some 3 billion hard working, tough and hungry people around the world.
Meanwhile, our Congress felt it could carry on in the same hedonistic, high-spending, liberal manner.
The countries of Europe got together, sacrificing much of their individual cultures and sovereignty to compete, on equal terms, in the form of the European Union.
The E.U. is an increasingly competitive threat to the U.S. Today, its stock and government bond markets are larger that those of America, and its currency, the euro, has more units in circulation than the U.S. dollars.
This past January, Germany alone (facing high interest rates and a greatly appreciated currency) knocked us into second place as the world's largest exporter. A month later, China pushed us into third place.
[Editor's Note:Try Intelligent Options for $99. Our lowest price ever. ]
Yesterday's New York Times ran an article asserting that the E.U. had recently displaced the U.S. as the "economic engine" of the world economy.
Worse still, the Euro has increasingly displaced the U.S. dollar as the "reserve currency" of the world's central banks.
The fact that our dollar was the world's "reserve currency" was of great strategic and economic advantage to our country. Worldwide demand for U.S. dollars allowed the U.S. to have relatively lower interest rates than our main economic competitors. This helped our economic growth, to a crucial degree.
In the "oil shock" of 1973, our Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was able to pull off a major strategic coup by persuading OPEC to take U.S. dollars as the exclusive payment for their oil. This allowed America to inflate with impunity without doing serious damage to our dollar in the foreign exchange markets.
Despite this vastly changed world, our Congress continues to "interfere" and even to threaten far greater "controls" over our free enterprise system.
Worst of all, in the face of a plunging dollar (threatening its credibility as a currency, not just as a reserve currency) and the growing evidence of inflation (despite the "cooked" CPI figures), our Congress continues to leave our Fed in a fettered and highly uncooperative position.
Last week we witnessed the galling experience of delegations of our government facing two of our biggest strategic competitors (China and Iran). The saddest thing of all was to see our negotiators with no "Royal" cards in their hands.
As we said last week, we believe our government must quit bleating and start competing, by freeing up good some old Yankee free enterprise competition (Sarbanes-Oxley, etc).
One place it could start and have immediate effect upon our entire economy would be to free our Fed from its second debilitating mandate to encourage economic growth.
[Editor's Note:Buffett, Soros, Templeton, Rogers: Learn Their Money-Making Secrets}
Free of its government imposed second mandate, our Fed would be put on a level playing field with its competing central banks.
Our dollar would be allowed to compete and so allow American business to compete, not just on price (the downward slope to long term failure) but on the essential long-term success determents of the "Product Marketing Mix", just as Germany and Switzerland have done so successfully for years.
Of course, it will be tough, particularly as interest rates will rise, and our government will have to face their financial realty of the liberal profligate policies by actually paying a market rate for their debt and their social security promises.
We believe that, in order to become truly competitive, our government must face international realty by freeing our Fed. Thus allowing us, the people, to compete.
Regardless of Congressional inaction, we note that at long last, the long bond market is beginning to signal increased interest rates as the yield curve steepens slowly to become more normal and in our view more realistic!
In light of this, we continue to urge our readers to remain averse to accepting the great risks we see as inherent in the price of long bonds.
You are mistaken.
Are the Federal Reserve System and Reserve Banks ever audited?
The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, and the Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levels of audit and review. Under the Federal Banking Agency Audit Act (enacted in 1978 as Public Law 95-320), which authorizes the Comptroller General of the United States to audit the Federal Reserve System, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has conducted numerous reviews of Federal Reserve activities. In addition, the Board's Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits and investigates Board programs and operations as well as those Board functions delegated to the Reserve Banks. Completed and active GAO reviews and completed OIG audits, reviews, and assessments are listed in the Board’s Annual Report (before 2002, the reviews were listed in the Board's Annual Report: Budget Review).
The Board's financial statements, and its compliance with laws and regulations affecting those statements, are audited annually by an outside auditor retained by the OIG. The financial statements of the Reserve Banks are also audited annually by an independent outside auditor. In addition, the Reserve Banks are subject to annual examination by the Board. The Board's financial statements and the combined financial statements for the Reserve Banks are published in the Board's Annual Report.
We pay $1 trillion to whom? To service what debt?
No we don't.
This past January, Germany alone (facing high interest rates and a greatly appreciated currency) knocked us into second place as the world's largest exporter. A month later, China pushed us into third place.
Who cares? This would only matter if we still believe in mercantilism, but that was debunked by Adam Smith in 1776.
“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.” - Thomas Jefferson
We don't owe the Fed anything. Our debt is owned by whoever buys it, which is just about anybody.
Grow up.
We owe the Fed $9 trillion. That was funny!
Yeah I’m sorry, it’s JUST $6.5 trillion, but with interest it won’t be but a couple of years before it’s 9.
We owe the Federal Reserve $6.5 trillion? Do you think your pie chart shows that? LOL!
Thank goodness those in power at that time listened to Hamilton instead of Jefferson. Otherwise, we may not have become the powerhouse we are today.
Kinda looks like the modern work week to me. Tax freedom day anyone???? Nevermind, oohhhh look over there, it's a pre-approved Chase-Manhattan Uber Platinum card with a credit line of $25,000.
If I get one, do I make my payment to the Federal Reserve?
Ultimately. Especially since Chase is one of the major shareholders of the Federal Reserve. Funny though, all of my money says “Federal Reserve Note” on it.
A major shareholder? How do you know? Did you ever find out how much profit they make from these shares every year?
Do the shareholders get to vote on interest rates at Fed meetings?
Funny though, all of my money says “Federal Reserve Note” on it.
Why is that funny?
So where is the Federal Reserve on your chart?
You never did say whether it was a good idea that that information is more closely guarded than the nuclear launch codes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.