Maybe they'd make fun of him in that silly hat.
1 posted on
05/16/2007 10:35:30 AM PDT by
bedolido
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: bedolido
The risk of combat is what peasants are for.
2 posted on
05/16/2007 10:39:53 AM PDT by
Lexington Green
(Every American killed by a Mexican truck is a homicde committed by our leaders..)
To: bedolido
Go easy on the kid...we wants to go....its the higher ups who don’t have the backbone.
3 posted on
05/16/2007 10:40:53 AM PDT by
Dog
To: bedolido
Silly hats are a family weakness.
4 posted on
05/16/2007 10:41:21 AM PDT by
DManA
To: bedolido
the general who approved his deployment, then cancelled it, claimed there were specfic threats. There must be something like Al Qaeda moles inside the british army base or something that they can’t flush out.
10 posted on
05/16/2007 10:49:41 AM PDT by
rogernz
To: bedolido
the changing situation on the ground exposed the prince to too much danger. War will do that to ya....
12 posted on
05/16/2007 10:50:34 AM PDT by
capydick
(What if the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about?)
To: bedolido
Then what about AFGHANISTAN?................
14 posted on
05/16/2007 10:51:12 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
To: bedolido
The tradition of officers wearing black bowler hats and carrying umbrellas goes back to the First World War. I thought it would be pith helmets and swager sticks!
15 posted on
05/16/2007 10:51:47 AM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: bedolido
Stick a fork in the House of Windsor, they're done, and the monarchy is done when Liz goes. Nobody wants Charlie to be king (except Camilla), and if Diana's Boys are too fragile to go to war the way Liz's younger son did, then what the bloody h*ll do they need a very expensive monarchy for. The only thing aristocrats were ever good for was their willingness to fight for king and country, and their military prowess. Lose that, even now, and they're just a drag on the economy.
20 posted on
05/16/2007 10:55:37 AM PDT by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: bedolido
Churchill would have said send him with his unit and al Qaeda be damned.
22 posted on
05/16/2007 10:56:23 AM PDT by
Argus
To: bedolido
The mistake was making public his future deployment. I don’t understand those taking cheap shots at the kid, by all accounts he wanted to serve honorably.
25 posted on
05/16/2007 10:58:36 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: bedolido
Ridiculous! Let the fellow go. That’s why he joined.
26 posted on
05/16/2007 11:00:41 AM PDT by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: bedolido
|
Maybe Bush can swap-- We'll send Paris to Iraq, they send Harry here . . .
|
To: bedolido
They look like they have different fathers...
33 posted on
05/16/2007 11:20:30 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(I might be a FRedneck...)
To: bedolido
I never believed that he’d be sent. If I were in his unit, I’d be jumping for joy right now. Every jihadist in Iraq would have been gunning for that unit. I think the Brits made the right choice. Good for Harry for wanting to go though.
38 posted on
05/16/2007 11:48:44 AM PDT by
TUAN_JIM
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: bedolido
Just let the kid kick Sean Penn's butt! That will be serviced served!
48 posted on
05/16/2007 12:26:35 PM PDT by
avacado
To: bedolido
Which reminds me, has anybody seen or heard from George P. Bush lately? Something tells me he just might have joined the service.
52 posted on
05/16/2007 12:35:19 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: bedolido
Monarchies are the biggest welfare recipients on the planet.
56 posted on
05/16/2007 12:50:36 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: bedolido
He wants to go and he truly prepared himself to hit the ground running in Iraq. But I think we can all agree the moment he had arrived in Iraq he would have become target numero uno.
too juicy to pass up by the militant terrorists. He will be King someday.
To: bedolido
Didn’t Al Gore go to Vietnam with a “handler”?
73 posted on
05/16/2007 2:08:09 PM PDT by
LetsRok
To: bedolido
The Queen’s not all that awful and her sons/grandsons, though obnoxious and wierd, are probably quite pleasant most of the time and generally mean well and want everyone in their social sphere to think well of them. But the elephant hiding in the corner is this: Britain’s system of government is a mess. The monarchy isn’t even out of date anymore. It’s a fraud, a sideshow and has been for almost a century. It is not a check on the power of the ruling party in Commons, something that the UK desperately needs.
89 posted on
05/16/2007 8:19:16 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson