Posted on 05/04/2007 11:12:38 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
(from the CANA website (www.canaconvocation.org ))
Letter from The Most Revd. Peter J Akinola
2nd May, 2007
The Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori,
Episcopal Church Center
815 Second Avenue
New York, NY 10017, USA
My dear Presiding Bishop:
My attention has been drawn to your letter of April 30th ostensibly written to me but published on the Episcopal News Service website.
In light of the concerns that you raise it might be helpful to be reminded of the actions and decisions that have led to our current predicament.
At the emergency meeting of the Primates in October 2003 it was made clear that the proposed actions of the Episcopal Church would "tear the fabric of our Communion at its deepest level, and may lead to further division on this and further issues ..." Sadly, this proved to be true as many provinces did proceed to declare broken or impaired communion with the Episcopal Church. Since that time the Primates have established task forces, held numerous meetings and issued a variety of statements and communiqus but the brokenness remains, our Provinces are divided, and so the usual protocol and permissions are no longer applicable.
You will also recall from our meeting in Dar es Salaam that there was specific discussion about CANA and recognition - expressed in the Communique itself - of the important role that it plays in the context of the present division within your Province. CANA was established as a Convocation of the Church of Nigeria, and therefore a constituent part of the Communion, to provide a safe place for those who wish to remain faithful Anglicans but can no longer do so within The Episcopal Church as it is currently being led. The response for your own House of Bishops to the carefully written and unanimously approved Pastoral Scheme in the Communique makes it clear that such pastoral protection is even more necessary.
It is my heartfelt desire - and indeed the expressed hope of all the Primates of the Communion - that The Episcopal Church will reconsider its actions - and make such special measures no longer necessary. This is the only way forward for full restoration into fellowship with the rest of the Communion. Further, I renew the pledge that I made to your predecessor, Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold, that the Church of Nigeria will be the first to restore communion on the day that your Province abandons its current unbiblical agenda. Until then we have no other choice than to offer our assistance and oversight to our people and all those who will not compromise the "faith once for all delivered to the saints." (Jude 1:3)
You speak in your letter of centuries old custom regarding diocesan boundaries. You are, of course, aware that the particular historical situation to which you make reference was intended to protect the church from false teaching not to prevent those who hold to the traditional teaching of the church from receiving faithful episcopal care. It was also a time when the Church had yet to face into the challenge of different denominational expressions of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. I also find it curious that you are appealing to the ancient customs of the church when it is your own Province's deliberate rejection of the biblical and historic teaching of the Church that has prompted our current crisis.
You mention the call to reconciliation. As you well know this is a call that I wholeheartedly embrace and indeed was a major theme of our time in Tanzania. You will also remember that one of the key elements of our discussion and the resulting Communique was the importance of resolving our current differences without resorting to civil law suits. You agreed to this. Yet it is my understanding that you are still continuing your own punitive legal actions against a number of CANA clergy and congregations. I fail to see how this is consistent with your own claim to be working towards reconciliation.
Once again please know that I look forward to the day when this current crisis is behind us and we can all be reunited around our One Lord and only Saviour Jesus the Christ. Until then be assured of my prayers for you and The Episcopal Church.
In Christ,
SIGNED
The Most Revd. Peter J Akinola, CON, DD
Archbishop, Metropolitan and Primate of all Nigeria.
Installation Celebration, May 5, 2007
The honor of your presence is requested at the celebration attending the Installation of the Right Reverend Martyn Minns as the Missionary Bishop of the Convocation of Anglicans in North America.
Time: 12:30 p.m.
Date: Saturday, May 5, 2007
Location:
The Cecil D. Hylton Memorial Chapel
14640 Potomac Mills Road
Woodbridge, VA 22192
Akinola is probably right now the single most powerful Protestant Christian in the world--having more people under his influence than anyone else.
FYI for the Anglican Ping list
I just wish he would stop over in South Carolina and install the duly elected Bishop there.
It does seem that the good Bishop has just handed Mrs. Schori her....uh....posterior.
Here’s an even funnier letter from an Associate Rector at Truro Church (Bishop Minn’s home church)(notice the “(sic)” insertions at Shori’s mistakes in grammar...):
Irony Abounds
Richard Crocker
Episcopal Presiding Bishop Schori this week called on Archbishop Akinola not to proceed with Martyn Minns’ Installation as Missionary Bishop to CANA. She cited three reasons for her request. “First, such action would violate the ancient customs of the church which limits (sic) the episcopal activity of a bishop to only the jurisdiction to which the bishop has been entrusted, unless canonical permission has been given. Second (sic), such action would not help the efforts of reconciliation that are taking place in the Episcopal Church and in the Anglican Communion as a whole. Third (sic), such action would display to the world division and disunity that are not part of the mind of Christ, which we must strive to display to all.”
This is frankly bizarre! CANA has emerged to deal with the very points she says she wants to uphold. It was the Episcopal Church which violated not only ancient customs, but also the apostolic faith, by its consecration of self confessed active homosexual Gene Robinson as Bishop in 2003. It was the Episcopal Church that, ignoring calls by the worldwide church, created the need for reconciliation by this action. As they were told, such action would tear the fabric of the Anglican Communion at its deepest level. Thirdly, would that there would have been a similar concern for division and disunity before the Episcopal Church embarked on its unnecessary and damaging course. One of the Episcopal commentators had this succinct response to her letter: “Beyond parody!” As so often in recent history, The Episcopal Church is asking for listening while exhibiting deafness; calling for humility while demonstrating arrogance; and expecting cooperation while trumpeting autonomy.
But back to Saturday’s celebration, and the question on everybody’s lips-What is an Installation? The custom in many Anglican Provinces is for Bishops to be ordained at a central national place. The Bishop is then presented to his Diocese by the Archbishop or his representative at a local Installation, where his ministry is recognized and commissioned. From now, Bishop Martyn will devote himself to leading us, to preach the Gospel and make disciples, within a Convocation that will seek to build a new American expression of faithful Christian witness within the Anglican Communion.
That’s what we are about. Let’s ask God for his vision and guidance as we set out on this road.
Your brother in Christ,
Richard
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail Huber if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by Huber.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
What’s new on that matter, BTW...
The folks in South Carolina are planning to re-elect him Bishop and re-submit him for approval. They are trying to play by the rules, even when the Presiding Priestess does not.
I hope, preferably sooner than later, South Carolina Episcopalians get out of TEC, assuming it remains unrepentant. AMiA, CANA, or just (temporary) independence (as painful as that is) is better than being under the control of the majority false bishops.
Perhaps Father Lawrence will move that direction—although it sounds as if he has practically had to vow he never will to TEC, in order to become Bishop.
or RE, or ARP, or PCA, or even RC.
Very true. Didn’t mean to leave continuing Anglicans out.
Two days ago, on the feast of St. Athanasius, someone on another thread wondered if such champions of orthodoxy were in our midst in our own day. I believe we have that answer in the affirmative.
APCK?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.