Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taiwan says it would win war with China
Associated Press(AP) ^ | April 24, 2007 | Annie Huang

Posted on 04/24/2007 4:24:56 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Taiwan says it would win war with China

By Annie Huang, Associated Press Writer | April 24, 2007

TAIPEI, Taiwan --A computer simulation projected that China could land forces on rival Taiwan, but they would be repulsed after two weeks of fierce fighting and harsh losses to both sides, Taiwan's military said Tuesday.

The complex simulation involved a scenario of China invading the island, 100 miles off its coast, in 2012.

Taiwan and China split amid civil war in 1949, but Beijing considers Taiwan Chinese territory. The computer scenario was based on China's repeated threats to attack if Taiwan ever tries to formalize its de facto independence.

The military released its findings from the simulation to reporters on Tuesday.

In the simulation, Chinese ships ferry forces to the island, backed by heavy missile barrages and pinpoint airstrikes on Taiwanese military bases and other strategic facilities.

The "invaders" establish beachheads along Taiwan's west coast, though their arrival is delayed for several days by Taiwanese missile strikes on mainland military bases, and by Taiwanese navy counterattacks.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; prc; roc; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki
The "invaders" establish beachheads along Taiwan's west coast,

Unbelievable. AP strikes again. Not so subtle jab from AP against the Taiwanese "interlopers" that "stole" the rightful communist territory of Formosa?

41 posted on 04/24/2007 6:38:13 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
You have no idea of my knowledges.

I have a pretty good idea.

Allow me to point out to you that a “modern” navy was not required at Dunkirk.

Dunkirk was an EVACUATION, not an invasion. Two totally different things. One thing to frantically try to escape somewhere without all of your equipment and supplies (which were left at Dunkirk), another completely different thing to make an opposed invasion.

And the majority of the troops evacuated at Dunkirk were evacuated by the Royal Navy, despite the involvement of small British civilian craft to pick up some of the troops.

Thousands of little craft carrying platoons across 110 miles is certainly very doable and actually very difficult to defend against if you do not control the air.

And armor, heavy artillery, and the obscene amount of supplies needed for modern combat are carried in these little craft?

Opposed amphibious invasions are the most complex thing in warfare. Such an invasion of Taiwan would be more difficult and complex than either the invasion of Okinawa or Normandy in World War II. And the PRC has ZERO experience in conducting one.

Remember, Victor/Liberty ships in WWII were being completed in 60 days.

And were essentially unarmed.

Also keep in mind we're so used to fighting fanatical/suicidal enemies now, and the odd example of the Japanese in World War II, that we can forget that not everyone is the same. While the initial Chinese forces in the Korean War were pretty ideologically motivated and fanatical, we killed all those guys, and otherwise in Chinese history there's no particular pattern of suicidal/fighting to the death military forces.

42 posted on 04/24/2007 6:39:58 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
A computer simulation projected that China could land forces on rival Taiwan, but they would be repulsed after two weeks of fierce fighting and harsh losses to both sides

The computer then simulated that anthropogenic global warming will totally submerge the island by 2013 and wreak much more devastation than the invasion...


43 posted on 04/24/2007 6:52:25 AM PDT by philled (The Democrat's 'new vision' for Iraq looks a lot like Pol Pot wearing a turban...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

The American Plan Purple for fighting the Japanese in World War II called for the Pacific Fleet steaming from Pearl Harbor to engage the Imperial Navy in an epic battleship confrontation, with the Japanese Navy swept from the seas in about six months, while American garrisons in the Phillipines and Wake Island bravely held out.

In September 1939 there were five German divisions between Berlin and the west. Belgium and Holland could have mobilized thirty divisons between them. If the Belgians had invaded Germany in 1939, it would have been a race to Berlin, with the German army at the wrong starting line, engaged with a very determined Polish resistance. Of course, the Belgians and Dutch had concluded that it was not their fight.

No plan survives first contact with the enemy.

The PRC has to consider this as well, any invasion plan would depend on very fragile assumptions. The defense of Taiwan is probably more robust with respect to assumptions than its invasion.


44 posted on 04/24/2007 6:52:40 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Hmm.

I would love to see the details on this, but they are obviously secret.

45 posted on 04/24/2007 6:53:45 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; taxcontrol

There were more than 30 shipbuilding companies during WWII pumping out ships.

We now have only 2 large shipbuilders in the country. 3 if you count GD making subs.

We could never duplicate what we did in the BIG ONE because infrastructure is not there any longer.

Do we even know what the ChiCom’s capacity for shipbuilding is?


46 posted on 04/24/2007 6:58:26 AM PDT by 66-442hot (It isn't smart to kill the golden goose........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

“In the simulation, Chinese ships ferry forces to the island, backed by heavy missile barrages and pinpoint airstrikes on Taiwanese military bases and other strategic facilities. “

I don’t believe the Chinese have the sealift capability to launch and invasion of this magnitude. Consider just how many ships it took to invade any of the islands in the Pacific in World War Two, then consider the Taiwan anti ship missiles simply couldn’t miss a fleet that large, in that confined of an area of ocean.


47 posted on 04/24/2007 7:06:33 AM PDT by Badeye (Over a thousand? (chuckle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
And armor, heavy artillery, and the obscene amount of supplies needed for modern combat are carried in these little craft?

A false straw man argument.

Your first mistake is making the assumption that you NEED all of those supplies to sustain a military operation. In truth, you only need rations (including water), ammunitions, fuel and means of communications to conduct a combat operation. Anything else is extra and not required. To assume it does is to make the classic large Army mistake in that you assume the other guy simply must do things the same way that you do.

Allow me to provide an example from your prior message. Your comment about the liberty ships... true, they were unarmed. How difficult would be to retro fit a existing cargo ship ... say an ocean barge, with a battery of MRLS and a supply of rockets? Or change that, how about turning one into a low cost helicopter refueling station. land on the deck... get the fuel and then fly off to the next ship to load up on troops or ammunition or rockets?

Also, you mentioned the Chinese forces as having no experience in conducting such an assault. But in this scenario, they would have the experience of one major assault.

Consider the damage that would be done on the Taiwanese forces during the first assault. Much of their military would be reduced or nonexistent. The population of 25 million would likely be severally reduced.

Never underestimate the enemy. Heck, just buying the WWII surplus ships refit for operations and then conduct a naval blockade of Taiwan would be a very effective means of reducing the Taiwanese ability to respond to such an attack.

And who says it has to be a naval / marine assault. 10,000 helicopters and a couple thousand sea planes and a thousand bombers and a few hundred attack fighters could overwhelm the remaining Taiwanese forces.

48 posted on 04/24/2007 7:07:21 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Four words for Taiwan victory

Bomb Three Gorges Dam

Break that and you've immediately made the cost of invasion too high.

49 posted on 04/24/2007 7:11:47 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Bomb the 3 gorges dam using what?It’s beyond the practical reach of Taiwan’s jets & missiles.


50 posted on 04/24/2007 7:16:01 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Is it beyond a one way flight carrying an improvised nuclear device?

Remember that they had knowledge sharing with South Africa and Israel back in the 60's

51 posted on 04/24/2007 7:27:52 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Hmm,if I were Taiwan’s president & had nukes,why would I put several of my best pilots at risk to nuke something a 1000 miles away when there are several Chinese military installations close by??Since you brought up nukes,why bother about the 3 gorges??

All available sources seem to suggest Taiwan doesn’t have nukes or atleast hasn’t restarted what papa Bush nudged them to stop.


52 posted on 04/24/2007 7:33:26 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Yet another in a long, long list of reasons that China would only attack Taiwan as a last desperate measure to save a crumbling regime -- which is certainly possible. Taiwan makes a useful bogeyman and patriotic rallying cry for the ChiComs. It takes the spotlight off their own serious internal social problems.

Exactly analagous to the situation in the mid-east. The dictatorships there have NO interest in resolving the Israeli-Pali conflict. The Israelis are their boogey-man, and having a peaceful situation there benefits NONE of these regimes.

53 posted on 04/24/2007 7:57:24 AM PDT by NYC Republican (Conservatives' Biggest Problem- Single Issue Voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
"The 'invaders' establish beachheads along Taiwan's west coast,"

If anything, this statement suggests Taiwan is distinct from the PRC, and that the PRC--being the invaders--are going into a foreign territory.

54 posted on 04/24/2007 8:33:34 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Hmm,if I were Taiwan’s president & had nukes,why would I put several of my best pilots at risk to nuke something a 1000 miles away when there are several Chinese military installations close by??Since you brought up nukes,why bother about the 3 gorges??

Hit your enemies where they are weakest and where your strikes will do the most damage.

Kill 10,000 people on a hardened military base ... big deal to the average Chinese man.

Kill 3 million plus with floods from a dam busting? Yeah, the chinese are going to think twice.

55 posted on 04/24/2007 9:17:41 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Killing all of your enemies without mercy is the only sure way of sleeping soundly at night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nativist

If Chinese see them doing that to their brothers on Taiwan, the Communist government would be overthrown.


56 posted on 04/24/2007 9:21:03 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Atta boy.

of course, dunno how far Democratic Taiwan would’ve anticipated commie Beijing’s willingness and ability to play scorched earth.....

In any case, pays to listen when Taipei is talking. Unlike, say, Arafart or Saddam or Musharraf, thy aren’t given to random hyperbole.


57 posted on 04/24/2007 10:05:59 AM PDT by voletti (There's no place, I can be, since I found, serenity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

While not doing Global Warming models...


58 posted on 04/24/2007 11:30:14 AM PDT by Holicheese (I love shrimp and grits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Popocatapetl
1) Major attacks on the United States ports of Bremerton, Washington and San Diego, to impair the US Pacific Fleet, yet not obviously attacks by China. Possibly a third attack on the east coast.

In league with Islamacists ?

I've always believed that China is a "silent partner" on the part of the Islamacists.

Anyone remember the 100,000 assault rifles shipped by China in the 1990s that were intercepted by Customs Agents in the US ?

Don't leave out the control of the Ithsmus of Panama by the Chinese (another gift that keeps on giving, thank you Jimmy Carter).

59 posted on 04/24/2007 12:20:30 PM PDT by happygrl (Dunderhead for HONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu; sam_paine
"The 'invaders' establish beachheads along Taiwan's west coast,"

No, in this case I think sam_paine is right. The AP has placed quotation marks around the word, implying that they are not true invaders.

Check the article.

Good catch sam.

60 posted on 04/24/2007 12:23:59 PM PDT by happygrl (Dunderhead for HONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson