The next shoe is being readied to drop.
Central control must be utilized to "help" the poor.
The US and even the Chinese are objecting to the rhetoric, even from amongst the Global Warmins shill scientists that attend such conferences.
However, the fix is in. The stategy is now set and locked in.
Long Live the Revolution.
Send the poor to Mars. Oops, Mars is having it’s own global warming issues.
Lesson to be learned: It sucks to be poor. Don’t do it!
The “poor” are always the hardest hit, on any matter...............That’s why we call them “poor”........
The so-called “cures” will hurt the poorest much worse.
“Woman and Children Hardest Hit”
I find it interesting that during the winter, which was quite cold, the global warming(tm) BS all but stopped.
Now that spring is coming, the papers are hitting us with it full-force again.
THE WORLD TO END TOMORROW!
Women, children and poor hardest hit.
Only if they don’t buckle their seatbelt!!!
Go here: http://www.dhmo.org/
Download all of their info and start a petition drive to help ban Dihydrogen Monoxide.
The left loves to sign those petitions, then when they are all worked up about it you get to tell them that Dihydrogen Monoxide is good ol' H2O.
Liberal to English translation: Global warming will promote food production worldwide and will help the world's poor the most.
World climate experts have issued their bleakest forecasts yet on the effects of climate change, predicting that it will inflict damage on every continent but hit the world's poor disproportionately hard.
|
Anyone who wonders what the UN/IPCC Anthropogenic Global Warming hype is actually about need only look no further than Europe to note the real agenda behind the AGW push, and it ain't science:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/04/news/climate.php
France and 45 other countries call for world environmental monitor
International Herald Tribune: Europe
The Associated Press Published: February 4, 2007
- PARIS: Forty-five nations joined France in calling for a new environmental body to slow global warming and protect the planet, a body that potentially could have policing powers to punish violators.
- "It is our responsibility," Chirac said. "The future of humanity demands it."
- "Without naming the United States, the producer of about one-quarter of the world's greenhouse gases, Chirac expressed frustration that "some large, rich countries still must be convinced" and were "refusing to accept the consequences of their acts."
- "So far, it is mostly European nations that have agreed to pursue plans for the new organization and hold their first meeting in Morocco this spring."
- "We are at a tipping point," Gore said to the conference by videophone. "We must act, and act swiftly." He added: "Such action requires international cooperation."
- "It is time now to hear from the world's policy makers," Tim Wirth, president of the United Nations Foundation, said Friday. "The so-called and long-overstated 'debate' about global warming is now over."
- "The United Nations also is considering a summit meeting of world leaders to tackle global warming, and de Boer said he would expect the United States to send high-ranking officials to to participate.
"Scientists who want to attract attention to themselves, who want to attract great funding to themselves, have to (find a) way to scare the public . . . and this you can achieve only by making things bigger and more dangerous than they really are."
-- Petr Chylek, Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, commenting on reports that Greenland's glaciers are melting. Halifax Chronicle-Herald, August 22, 2001"Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as "synfuels," shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration."
-- James Hansen, stated in presentation to Council on Environmental Quality, June 12, 2003
"To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have."
--Steven Schneider, Quoted in Discover, pp. 45-48, Oct. 1989; and American Physical Society, APS News August/September 1996.
There; I fixed it.
Lost in the confusion is a simple fact:
Spending billions$ to solve imaginary problems will enrich NGOs and scam artists, and impact the poor the most no matter who is identified as "paying" it...
It is comforting beyond words finally to see the real scientists rebelling against having the political and social activists twist and pervert their findings and analyses...
Actually the “poor” would be far worse off under the draconian measures being proposed to “save the planet”. When fossil fuels are taxed to the hilt how are the poor in the US going to heat their homes, drive to their jobs or even afford necessities when the prices of these things go up radically? With the economy under the carbon taxes heading to deep recession will the “poor” even have jobs? Of course the goverment will have to save them.
If you want to have some fun with these moonbats, just tell them that global warming is a fraud being fostered by the nuclear power industry to clear the way for more reactors.
Their heads explode.