Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What would it take to make the free world rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism?

Posted on 04/05/2007 9:18:28 AM PDT by dotnetfellow

Thought Experiment: What would it take to make the free world rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism?

Apparently kidnapping and taking hostage British soldiers isn't going to motivate the free world to rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism.

Iranian terrorists crossing into Iraq and blowing up innocents isn't going to motivate the free world to rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism.

Lebanese terror groups hurling rockets into Israel isn't going to motivate the free world to rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism.

And lets face it, if Gore, or Kerry after him, had won the presidential election (both close elections), even now the US would not be confronting islamo-fascist terrorism in the Middle East.

Is there anything that may motivate the free world to rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism?


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: daralislam; dhimmitude; fascist; islam; islamo; islamophilia; muhammadsminions; terrorism; thelongwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last
To: dotnetfellow

Our leaders never will.

Unfortunately the citizens will have to fight at some point, just to survive.


121 posted on 04/05/2007 12:36:47 PM PDT by newcthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
Somebody's gonna have to blow up American Idol. Either that, or someone's gonna have to blow up Brangelina when they try to adopt a Third World baby.
122 posted on 04/05/2007 12:37:57 PM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete98
Keep in mind this is being nice, since muslims don’t want to deport us, but to kill us all instead.

In the interests of fairness, I'd like to point out that Mohammedans would be equally satisfied if we (a) converted or (b) surrendered and became their slaves.
123 posted on 04/05/2007 12:39:51 PM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

it would take an attack on Hollywood, with the Muslims citing the Jews in the entertainment business as the reason. That would cause our media to start reporting things differently.


124 posted on 04/05/2007 12:45:44 PM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
"Seeing the whites of their eyes" is simply a means of making sure you kill the bastards, not waste ammunition...

Perhaps, but on Breed's Hill, it certainly meant save your ammo, for as the day wore on, our guys were shooting bits of scrap metal from their muskets.

Still, I agree with your sentiments on this thread wholeheartedly.

125 posted on 04/05/2007 12:52:08 PM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
The world will react as they did in WWII against the Germans, when the muslims take over most of Europe, impose their law of butchery, and execute a large number of white nonislamic Europeans.
That is what it took to move us to war at the beginning of WWII, and that is what it took to move the Church into war during the crusades.
We are going to have to look at history and realize that the only way to contain or restrain violently imposed islam on free thinking people is to destroy the islamic momentum with all the force we can muster.
Islam only understands overwhelming force and the willingness to use it. We will get there and we will put them back into the stone age that they seem to value so much. The other kicker in this is that the US and China will be an allies in this venture. China has already remembered the cure for the islamic advance. China just kills them without publicity or fanfare. There is nothing about islam that is compatible with China's government or way of life. China will not allow islam to advance and will have no problem going to the source when the time comes.
126 posted on 04/05/2007 1:02:47 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

“why don’t you just state, clearly”

I did state it clearly.

You tell me what you think it would take.


127 posted on 04/05/2007 1:06:10 PM PDT by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

So it sounds like most believe, before the free world would be willing to rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism, it would require an extreme act of war from the islamo-fascist, on the scale of millions of innocent casualties, and even then, it would have to impact the majority’s immediate everyday lives, throwing the modern civilized world out of a state of comfortable living, and into a primal state of survival.


128 posted on 04/05/2007 1:32:20 PM PDT by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
What would it take to make the free world rise up against islamo-fascist terrorism?

New York, Chicago, Memphis, Dallas, San Francisco, Brussels, Paris, London, Berlin and Sidney all radioactive craters.

That might JUST be enough to wake up the damned fools who think the mohammedans are a bunch of harmless cavemen with oil and a bad PR firm.

Otherwise, it's simply going to be a matter of individuals taking the fight to the mohammedans on a one on one basis.
129 posted on 04/05/2007 1:41:04 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
The difference between us and the American’s is that the American’s love life and we love death” ~ Osama bin Ladin.

When you consider the sacrifices and tortuous decisions that WERE made in order to bring about the pacification and eventual westernization of Japan you get a small glimpse of what would be necessary to bring about a similar result with Islamofascists.

We, as a nation, HAD THE RIGHT STUFF then.....

Sadly and simply put......TODAY we [the USA] do NOT!!

130 posted on 04/05/2007 2:01:50 PM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
I did state it clearly.

Your headline didn't. You had to be asked by me what you were talking about.

131 posted on 04/05/2007 2:28:37 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

I dunno, say they hijacked a bunch of planes with innocent people, even young childern on board and crashed them into crowded buildings at the peak of the workday. That’d do it for sure, right?


132 posted on 04/05/2007 2:31:08 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

EVERYTHING seems to work in favor of the Islamo-fascist.
The latest ploy by Iran, has one purpose and one purpose only: to make THEM look like the good guys, the merciful ones, the humane ones. And to some mushbrains, it actually WORKS. First Iran had to make a case that the sailors were GUILTY of something, then it had to extract confessions, then it had to release them. Without the first two lies being established, the release would be meaningless. Have any statements been released yet by the sailors as to how and what they were told to say for the cameras?


133 posted on 04/05/2007 2:33:38 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The decayed and degraded state of moral... feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.

Your own quote from Mr. Mill says other wise.

A country of people who have no moral sense, is also the same group of people with no faith at all.

Morals are based on convictions of truth. You believe anyone who claims to know the truth is worth ignoring because they are arrogant, is a truth that you hold to. That is your moral standard. But is it a moral standard that moves a nation to defend itself? NO. False moral standards do not move anyone to defend themselves, do they?

I will put up my faith against anyone's but could never be so proud, arrogant and presumptuous as to claim the posession of the "truth".

Then your faith is not worth fighting, protecting or dying for, is it?

If there is no truth, then who cares? Why bother? There would be no point to it, to life, to this post, to your opinions, nothing.

134 posted on 04/05/2007 2:50:43 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delenda est publius schola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
IMO the politicans of our country (BOTH demrats and repubs)are waiting for the baby boom generation to die off. Once that happens (cause the suceeding generations have been dumbed down by government schools and mass media)they will turn this country over to our enemies. WHY?? For the power and wealth that I’m certain they’ve been promised in return for their cooperation.
135 posted on 04/05/2007 3:01:49 PM PDT by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

“Your headline didn’t. You had to be asked by me what you were talking about.”

My headline was clear.

In response to your retentive post, I gave you an example of what rising up against islamo-fascism means, even asking you if you thought it might mean that.

If you think that the free world is already rising up against islamo-fascism, then you need not apply as the unthinking deluded are ipso facto excluded from thought experiments.

If you think that the free world has yet to rise up against islamo-fascism, then enter your own idea of what you think that means instead of trying to split hairs with me.

If all you want to do is quibble, then you are a contributor to the problem with the country and the world, not a contributor to the solution.


136 posted on 04/05/2007 3:23:20 PM PDT by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
If you think that the free world is already rising up against islamo-fascism, then you need not apply as the unthinking deluded are ipso facto excluded from thought experiments.

Under new federal transportation rules, airport security is so tight that passengers need to arrive at the airport two hours early and take off their shoes. We're spending tens of billions of dollars on a Homeland Security agency. We're spending $2 billion a week on the Iraq war? Yet there are still some folks who say we're not responding to terrorism. In my book, we're responding very vigorously - you have to ignore all the new federal rules and the federal spending and the military lives put at risk, to say we're not responding to terrorism. You also must not travel much, because the security hassles of post 9-11 air travel would persuade you very quickly that we're not ignoring terrorism.

137 posted on 04/05/2007 5:18:56 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Airport security is your definition of “rising up against islamo-fascist terrorism”.

Point. Match. The free world is doomed.


138 posted on 04/05/2007 6:55:13 PM PDT by dotnetfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow
Airport security is your definition of “rising up against islamo-fascist terrorism”.

No, spending 100 billion a year on the Iraq war is. That's not chicken feed. And tens of billions more on Homeland Security. If you think we're ignoring terrorism, or not fighting terrorism, let's see you explain that to the kids whose dads are serving in Iraq or Afghanistan - or who have died serving there.

139 posted on 04/05/2007 9:55:50 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: dotnetfellow

Maybe if the terrorists blew up abortion clinics, the UN, and tried to break into the DNC headquarters at night...that just might do it.


140 posted on 04/05/2007 9:59:24 PM PDT by rbosque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson