Posted on 03/28/2007 7:59:09 AM PDT by presidio9
More than two-thirds of the world's large cities are in areas vulnerable to global warming and rising sea levels, and millions of people are at risk of being swamped by flooding and intense storms, according to a new study released Wednesday.
In all, 634 million people live in the threatened coastal areas worldwide defined as those lying at less than 33 feet above sea level and the number is growing, said the study published in the journal Environment and Urbanization.
More than 180 countries have populations in low-elevation coastal zones, and about 70 percent of those have urban areas of more than 5 million people that are under threat. Among them: Tokyo; New York; Mumbai, India; Shanghai, China; Jakarta, Indonesia; and Dhaka, Bangladesh.
The peer-reviewed scientific study said it is the first to identify the world's low-lying coastal areas that are vulnerable to global warming and rising sea levels. It said 75 percent of all people living in vulnerable areas are in Asia, with poorer nations most at risk.
The study gives no time frame for rising sea levels or the potential flooding in individual countries. It warns, however, the solution to the problem will not be cheap and may involve relocating many people and building protective engineering structures. And, it adds, nations should consider halting or reducing population growth in coastal areas.
"Migration away from the zone at risk will be necessary but costly and hard to implement, so coastal settlements will also need to be modified to protect residents," said Gordon McGranahan of the International Institute for Environment and Development in London, a co-author of the study.
IIED publishes the journal Environment and Urbanization. The other two co-authors of the study are Deborah Balk of the City University of New York and Bridget Anderson of Columbia University.
Separately, the authoritative Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in a draft copy of a report expected to be released next week that coastlines are already showing the impact of sea-level rise. The draft copy, which was obtained by The Associated Press, said about 100 million people each year could be flooded by rising seas by 2080.
The draft copy warned that two biggest cities in North America Los Angeles and New York are at risk of a combination of sea-level rise and violent storms. By 2090, under a worst-case scenario, megafloods that normally would hit North America once every 100 years "could occur as frequently as every 3-4 years," the draft said.
In February, the IPCC warned of sea-level rises of 7-23 inches by the end of the century due to global warming, making coastal populations vulnerable to flooding and more intense hurricanes and typhoons.
Asia is particularly vulnerable, the study said. The five nations with the largest total population living in endangered coastal areas are all in Asia: China, India, Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia.
Between 1994 and 2004, about one-third of the world's 1,562 flood disasters occurred in Asia, with half of the total 120,000 people killed by floods living in that region, the study said. In addition, more than 200,000 people were killed by the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004.
"Migration away from lowest elevation coastal zones will be important, but can be costly and difficult to implement without causing severe disruptions," the study said. Still, it said, "relatively small shifts in settlement location, out of a coastal plain onto more elevated ground, can make a major difference."
That is especially true in China, a country with an export-oriented economy that has created special economic zones in coastal locations, such as Shanghai. Fast economic growth has been associated with very rapid coastward migration, with the population in low-lying areas growing at almost twice the national population growth rate between 1990 and 2000, the study said.
"Unless something is done, there is the possibility that, as well as the people living in the low-elevation coastal zone, China's economic success will be placed at risk," it said.
___
Bullchip !!!
Send them luggage.
MAybe the Dem Politico machine in LA can steal even more Fed dollars and have AlGored stump for their plight?
Give me a fricking break! And there are actually people out there that believe that bs.
Chicken Little does his dance
But Chicken Little has no pants
Another slow news day
Any society that can't deal with a maximum rise in sea level of TWO FEET over NINETY YEARS has bigger problems than "global warming".
Thomas Wagner has written about 20 versions of this story so far this year. He's pacing himself.
Oh well....Guess it's time for some to move. I will go out on a limb here, But no looney carbon tax or moonbat carbon offset will do a damn thing. If the earth warms up, the earth warms up.
Hopefully, one of the cities to be wiped out by global warming with be Milwaukee............Just a minute, while I start my truck.
If the seas rise a few feet for whatever reason it is certainly going to cost me a ton of money even though I personally won't be effected. The question is: Should I attempt to change the planet and cause some real damage, or just say c'est la vie?
"Chicken Little does his dance
But Chicken Little has no pants"
That's why they call him Chicken Little!
This is EXACTLY what makes it all not matter.
Notice it specifically mentions in the article that the "study" in question doesn't at all mention a time frame.
And what on "earth" does the global warming sea-level rise have to do with "violent storms"? Now the icebergs melting leads to major storms?
Anyway, I'm STILL asking the question (which goes unanswered) - WHY does it matter that the (earth? air? what?) temperature rises 1deg (C or F?) over a century? What in hell is the big deal? None of us or the animals or plants can handle that?
It's unbelievable how far the brainwashing has gone. It's as if people can't think any more.
All the predictions about what it'll be like in a century.
I wonder how many laughs people will be having about this quaint musing at that point!
So far no one has convinced me that global warming is a bad thing. I figure my chances of a heart attack are lessened since I shovel less snow off my driveway. We'll be able to grow food in areas previously too cold. I'll be able to go to opening day and attend the World Series in shorts. What exactly is the downside to global warming?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.