Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 25 March 2007

Various big media television networks ^ | 25 March 2007 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

[Alas Babylon!]

The Talk Shows

Sunday, March 25th, 2007

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Trent Lott, R-Miss.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Fired U.S. attorneys David Inglesias and John McKay; Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; former U.S. Attorney H.E. "Bud" Cummins.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.; breast cancer specialist Dr. Eric Winer; breast-cancer survivors.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Samir Sumaidaie, Iraqi ambassador to U.S.; John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the U.N.; Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; Lanny Davis, former Clinton special counsel; Donna Brazile, Democratic strategist; Ed Gillespie, former RNC chairman.

[maica]

Bookmarking for after church

[rodguy911]

Absolutely correct it's all left to the new media to correct the false statements.

[saveliberty]

Me too.

If I have to be a single issue voter, this is it.

[saveliberty]

Another fake but accurate. At least the NYT issued a correction.

Thanks for the link, anita!

[Miss Didi]

Nice mention of Tony by Wallace.

[Mo1]

These Attorneys would never handle being on Trump's TV Show

You're Fired!

[rodguy911]

I guess everyone is different, I would quit now. Edwards is young enough to try a run later on. He only has one wife who appears now to be dying. Doesn't seem like a tough decision to me.

[saveliberty]

That's true. It's not our decision but I would think that Tony Blair wouldn't go wobbly on this situation.

[Graymatter]

You know what the poet said, "Do not go gentle into that good night..."
It's their business, but I would agree, the Edwards family is making the best of things.

[saveliberty]

We no longer question their patriotism as it's clear they don't have any.

Hat tip, Dr. Sanity.

http://instapundit.com/archives2/003588.php

[slapshot]

For these people to finally to see the horrible slant, it must be way over the top.

What is needed is for people on our side to get in these jagdorks faces and call them on their bias and refusal to cover stories right in front of them. Here are a few festering sores for starters:

1. Rahm Emanuel: Using the now convicted Chicago Machine player Tomczaks Water Department "workers" to help him closeout his first primary win for Congress

2. Harry Reid's land deals and connection to Jack Abramoff

3. Covering the case where Baghdad Jim McDermott has been ordered to pay 700K in damages and costs to Jim Boehmer for his role in leaking the "accidental wiretap" of his phone conversations with then Speaker Gingrich. Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't it seem in this case that Democrats support electronic eavesdropping. However, if this process is used to enhance National Security they are against it.

4. I can go on and on but, what use is it? These republipussies will continue to cower and be portrayed as clueless idiots.

[saveliberty]

Great links from Fausta Wertz

http://faustasblog.com/2007/03/iran-and-todays-items.html

[maica]

Interesting that the same media who attacked Giuliani for not having a good relationship with his son, are absolutely ignoring the effect on the Edwards' children of their parents' decision to keep going with the campaign.

Just one more double standard exmple.

[rodguy911]

The supposed confessions that the Britts gave have to be just rubbing salt into the wounds. Everyone knows the Britts did nothing to confess to and this is just more of the lying the Iranians do. I don't envy Blair,it will be more than interesting to see what he does.

[kabar]

I doubt there will be a show trial. The UK is reacting the same way we did when the USS Pueblo was seized by the North Koreans and our recon plane was forced down in China not long after Bush took office. This will be handled diplomatically. It could be protracted depending on how much the Iranians want to milk it for propaganda purposes or what they want in return for their release. Eventually, a deal will be made with both sides claiming victory.

[Mo1]

Tim Russert is a FRAUD

I can't believe those interviews he just did and I can't believe they all could keep a straight face

[rodguy911]

Wow that's pretty gross, (that guy should be shot)

[altura]

Phsstpok should really have a nationally syndicated column.

I just read his preview thread and he has some verbal gems:

I loved his description of The Nancy:

"the nations mother in law, Nazi Pelosi"

And how about this take on the Chuckster:

"This time it's nearly exclusive time for RINO Chuck Hagel, the mad prophet of the Republican left, Chuck is the ego from another planet, a would be Napoleon who sees himself with a messianic mission and an Olympian intellect. No one, absolutely no one, takes him seriously as a Republican candidate, but he gets air time in the DBM for obvious reasons."

And, well, it's hard to choose who to hate the most among the dem partisans, but Neal Gabler certainly runs a good race. Here's what the P-man said:

"Neal Gabler, a demonstrable liar and lunatic, a platform to bash Fox as a fascist joke but denying absolutely that his employer is a legitimate news organization. He should be sued for fraud for taking a check for doing a show on Fox purportedly to provide critical analysis of the media. I will say that Neal's statement tonight that there is "no other side" that is allowed to speak in the global warming "debate" forever relegates him to the ash heap of morons."

I actually heard Neal utter the inanity with a completely straight face that just saying there were two sides to the global warming debate was a sign of prejudice. Duh.

[bray]

The Rats have found that they can prosecute trials against Republicans better than elections. Like Coulter said, they are making it illegal to be Conservative.

Pray for W and Our Troops

[saveliberty]

You would have better experience to know if this would happen, kabar. I'm on the outside, and it looks as though the US is willing to change the rules of engagement. Not violating international law, but in changing the way in which the situation is handled.

rodguy911 points out that the direct response rests with the UK