Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth about Fred Thompson
TennesseeTalk Blog ^ | March 20, 2007 | anonymous

Posted on 03/20/2007 8:19:04 PM PDT by Josh Painter

Over the last few days, much has been said about Fred Thompson’s possible run for President. Some say that “he is the answer” for conservatives… others are saying “Fred? Conservative???? What???”. Look, I for one will most definitely be supporting Fred Thompson if he chooses to run for President. Might I disagree with some positions that he may take. Maybe. Who knows?

I will be supporting Fred Thompson because he is the “real deal”… more so than any politician that I have had the opportunity to be associated with. In 1994, I was a college kid at Vandy. I went to work for Fred’s campaign, when he was waaaaay behind in the polls and nobody even knew who he was. Some knew him as “hard-ass” in “No Way Out” and “In the Line of Fire”. But, really, nobody knew who he was… except for insiders who knew his potential.For those of you who may not recall, Fred’s campaign headquarters was in the 1808 building on West End. Well, at that point in the campaign, Fred was rarely leaving the office and - in no way - was he in active campaign mode. In fact, he spent many of his days kicking back in the office. As I said, I was a college kid…. licking envelopes and making phone calls - asking people for money for a candidate that they did not know about.

Fred won me over during those months. He didn’t have to “hang out” with me. But, Fred routinely came out of his office, pulled up a chair and just sat down and talked. He asked me all about myself and the things I cared about. He told me stories… great stories… memories that I will always treasure. Fred didn’t have to do that. I was just a kid. But, after being around politics for many years, I have concluded that the way politicians treat “lowly” volunteers separates great leaders from poor ones. By that standard, I would have to rate Fred at the top of any of the politicians I have had the privilege of being associated with. That year - I became a Fred fan for life.

Forward the clock 13 years, I was in a car coming from the airport in Chicago (Midway). When the driver found out that I was from Tennessee, he asked me if I knew Fred Thompson. I was proud to say yes. He told me that he drove Fred and his bride from his wedding to his hotel, the night of his wedding. After speaking with this guy, I realized that he was a fan, too. He said that Fred was one of the most genuine, nicest guys he ever met. We both talked about how much we wished that he would run for President. To tell you the truth, I am giddy about a potential Fred candidacy. When I worked with Fred, I travelled with him and his “entourage” to help out at some of his “truck stops” - in the latter days of the campaign. I saw him deal with media and voters. I have never seen a politician with more ability. And, based on personal experience, I have never had the privilege of knowing a more genuine, charismatic man in my life.

Look, Fred knows that if he runs people will be critical of him. That is part of it. But, the people who support Fred know why they support him, and they respect and admire his common sense approach to goverment grounded in the values of common people… not Washington.

Clearly, there is a void on the Republican side in this race. Fred, please run. This country needs you, and this is your time.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; electionpresident; fredthompson; nomination; republican; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Sturm Ruger

Fred Ping.


21 posted on 03/20/2007 9:32:47 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (Thompson / Hunter in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Oh, here we go with the ad hominems.

You'll have to do better than that if Fred gets close and the Clintonistas go after him.


22 posted on 03/20/2007 9:36:12 PM PDT by Let's Roll ("the left is rearranging the beach to make sure the tsunami comes in as unimpeded as possible." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

He's the most conservative electable Republican. What else do you need to know?


23 posted on 03/20/2007 9:40:00 PM PDT by dukakis kerry the dream team
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

I've done some digging into Fred's record. What I found has convinced me that he is absolutely fiscally conservative enough for me (I'm a small-l, small government person). In addition, he has been talking about restoring the proper balance between federal and state powers since the 90s, so the federalism talk is not a convenient pre-election stance. It's frankly apalling that more candidates are not talking about Constitutional principles.

As of now, Fred is tentatively number one for me, with Romney number two if Fred doesn't run.


24 posted on 03/20/2007 9:41:30 PM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Thanks for posting. ;o)


25 posted on 03/20/2007 9:42:37 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Sandy Berger/Richard Armitage '08 - the "Press-Free" Invisible Man Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

No, I didn't wite it. Only found it and posted it.


26 posted on 03/20/2007 9:44:28 PM PDT by Josh Painter (Draft Fred Thompson: the grassroots "surge that will transform the Republican race." - The Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

How about Thompson & Thompson as our candidates for Prez/VPrez? Tommy & Fred, or vice versa?


27 posted on 03/20/2007 9:48:01 PM PDT by WesG (Without geometry, life would be pointless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
...a woman 30 years younger a few years ago and they now have a very young child.

She is a Washington insider, a lawyer who worked for the Republican National Committee. Compare and contrast to, say, Judith Nathan, Rudy's wife number three, with whom he diddled in the Executive mansion while still married to and living there with wife number two, who was starring in the Vagina Monologues on Broadway at the time.

28 posted on 03/20/2007 9:49:47 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

You are all obsessed with Rudy's sex life.


29 posted on 03/20/2007 9:51:26 PM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ellery

I looked at Fred's record too and I agree that he's the only truly small government guy on either side. Whenever he had a choice between voting to allow government to do more or to prevent it from doing more, he chose to constrain government, not to grow it. At a time when the country is being led by two big government parties, that's a very attractive option, especially considering that the guy seems tough enough to take on the Islamists and could probably translate his Law 'n Order fame into votes in the swing states.


30 posted on 03/20/2007 9:51:41 PM PDT by RepublicanPOTUSin08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

Uh huh...Ok ...Uh huh ;)


31 posted on 03/20/2007 9:52:24 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bjcintennessee

ping


32 posted on 03/20/2007 9:53:34 PM PDT by ImaTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll

Of course.

But there's not a single candidate on the GOP side that the Clinton's aren't gonna go after:

Giuliani - three marriages...relationship with kids...
McCain - Crazy, two marriages, unstable
Romney - Mormon, flip-flopper
Newt - three marriages, gov't shutdown..."corruption"


You get the idea - I'm not saying these are things that would stop ME, but they're things the Clintonistas are going to go after.


33 posted on 03/20/2007 9:54:37 PM PDT by RockinRight ("After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood." - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger


"Can we get Sandy Berger, Richard Armitage and Joseph Wilson sworn in please...


;o)
34 posted on 03/20/2007 9:55:26 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Sandy Berger/Richard Armitage '08 - the "Press-Free" Invisible Man Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird; Howlin
As for marrying a younger woman and now having young child(ren), didn't he have a daughter from a previous marriage who died around the time he left the Senate?

But colleagues said he was hit hard by the death in January of his daughter, Elizabeth Thompson Panici, 38, following a heart attack. Thompson, 59, who has two other children, is divorced.

I've added your name to the ping list.

35 posted on 03/20/2007 9:56:27 PM PDT by jellybean (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanPOTUSin08

I was on a couple pretty leftist blogs and most of them said things like "Bush-ite" and "just like the current occupier" but those are the people that won't vote for ANY Republican, regardless, not even Rudy.

What gave me hope were the ones who said that, despite being liberal, they admire Fred's honesty and would vote for him.

I think he'd get a LOT more independent and even a few Democrat votes than we think he would.


36 posted on 03/20/2007 9:57:06 PM PDT by RockinRight ("After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood." - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
"I will be supporting Fred Thompson because he is the “real deal”…"

He comes across as genuine and authentic, no doubt about it.

37 posted on 03/20/2007 9:59:54 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Guiliani is a Democrat in Republican drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I agree.

I only raised the issue because so far on FR - all I've heard was how wonderful Fred was while seeing many threads picking at the other GOP candidates because they didn't get along with their still adolescent children to name one example.

Yikes, have none of these people raised children? And look at what serpents the Reagan's biological children are.


38 posted on 03/20/2007 10:05:47 PM PDT by Let's Roll ("the left is rearranging the beach to make sure the tsunami comes in as unimpeded as possible." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

FredHead, I like it!

FredHead it is! :-)

Count me in! (Unless someone better comes along...;-)


39 posted on 03/20/2007 10:07:39 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I have been a minor political junkie for years.

Fred Thompson is a viable conservative candidate.

Just IMO...

Prost!


40 posted on 03/20/2007 10:08:21 PM PDT by Prost1 (Fair and Unbiased as always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson