PING!
Posted on 03/08/2007 11:40:55 PM PST by conservative in nyc
The Dixie Chicks have a movie, Shut Up & Sing, coming out today, and, to keep things lively, they're staging a grudge match with the worst site on the Internet, political-rhetoric division.
"The fat chick will only drive traffic to this site," writes one poster to the site.
"The Frenchy Chix can't get a gig in a gay bar in Ithaca," writes another.
Others chime in with more corruptions: Chubby Chicks, Ditsy Twits, Vichy Chicks.
"Yep typical liberals," says someone else. "No character."
This is Free Republic, an exercise in political extremism that, despite being and something of an anthropological train wreck, keeps popping up square in the mainstream.
Most recently, it has resurfaced as a villain in the Dixie Chicks movie, which traces the fallout from lead singer Natalie Maines's infamous 2003 London declaration that she was embarrassed that George W. Bush was, like her, from Texas.
It was a bad time to be anti-war, and Americans are touchy about being criticized on foreign soil at the best of times. The "grassroots" backlash that followed -- orchestrated, in part, by the people at Free Republic, who mobilized their large and largely disgruntled membership -- saw the band savaged in the press and at the box office.
The site is a venerable and storied Web forum for American arch-conservatives. Funded by member donations, it was founded in 1996 as an anti-Clinton grandstand, and soon became a place where members could post news stories and discuss them -- though "discussion" might be the wrong word. More often, it's a kind of pantomime, where the name of the game is to cheer the good guy and boo the bad guy every time he creeps on stage.
Freepers, as the sites denizens are known, are the good guys. The bad guys, according to site founder Jim Robinson, are practitioners of "liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism," and "wacko environmentalism."
So it is that, day in and day out, Freepers attempt to outdo each other in posting the most pungent, juvenile reactions to stories. Articles containing an opposing viewpoint have the words "BARF ALERT" appended to their titles. Slurs are encouraged. When the first same-sex Canadian soldiers were married last year, the story garnered 73 angry responses, ranging from "Disgusting and despicable" to "I'd resign my commission before performing a ceremony to marry a couple of bone-smugglers" to "Let's see what happens when the Canadian military has an AIDS epidemic on its hands."
It's a hateful place that, if the world was working as it should, would be relegated to the Internet's endless fringes, where conspiracy theorists and pyramid-power believers roam the wasteland. But what's interesting about Free Republic is that, despite having attracted a crowd of the most paranoid, xenophobic and reactionary characters the political landscape has to offer, it continues to find itself in the news.
For instance, during the 2004 U.S. presidential election, it was central to the network of websites that uncovered the forged memos about Bush's Vietnam service that appeared on CBS News and ultimately cost Dan Rather his job. (Paranoia, in this instance, paid off.) Later, and less admirably, Jerome Corsi, the co-author of Unfit for Command -- the hatchet job about John Kerry's military service that crippled his campaign -- was found to be posting racist, sexist diatribes on the site.
And then there was the flap about the Dixie Chicks, spurred on by zealous Freepers. Thanks to their movie, Free Republic is getting another moment in the sun. Not helping things was the band's manager publicly calling Robinson "a coward" for refusing to be interviewed for the film. ("I am jealous of you Mr. Robinson," declared one Freeper in response. "You have been singled out and attacked by America's premier Entertraitors.") These, ladies and gentlemen, are grassroots at work. There are a lot of organizations out there that are in the business of whipping their members into a lather and unleashing them on corporations and politicians alike.
But if Free Republic has a virtue, it's that, unlike other pressure groups, it's transparent: You can see the cogs turning, the anger mounting, the members joining the half-baked me-too condemnations that will surface on tomorrow's news agenda. It's like a glass ant farm for zealots. It's a little stomach-turning, but man, they're diligent little things. It's hard not to stare sometimes.
I do not care what effete libs think of us.
In Free Republic, FRhomepage seems relatively innocuous--a few here could even consider parts of it liberal/leftist (it isn't).
However, almost a copy of the FRhomepage was put on Wookieepedia, and a bunch of Wookieepedians started declaring as being very bigoted (even racist, which is disgusting). (Though the guy who started it was Malaysian, and probably a Muslim--though he put a Christian userbox (which personally made) and Israel-supporter userbox on his Wookieepedian page--RIGHT BEFORE GOING TO THE AUTHORITIES, apparently to make himself look more neutral). Punk.
This is typical of Canadian "nannyism" against everything "American" as they like to remark through their noses...
That insignificant piece of tundra to the north should learn to get their own identity and stop borrowing the more successful one to the south - watching our every move - copying it - and then criticizing us for their failures to get it "right".
Canada - you don't have enough people - sorry about that - newcomers prefer the south side of the 49th - and I don't blame them.
O Canada - lurching into oblivion on a solo flight, blaming the U.S. for their fruitless journey.
I believe some of my FRiends at Free Dominion call it "The Grope & Flail..."
You can cherry pick ( as this little girly-man did ) zingers from the comment section of most any forum or blog and make it appear that the members are barking moonbats who you would not entrust your dog to.
Zealots? Perhaps a few, but no site does a better job of fact-checking and fraud unmasking.
Good company- but I hear Wifey ( don't google it! ) calling...
We are also clean and articulate.
The author of this "piece" is on google - apparently he has an anger management issue - very little he approves of.
Attention getting little wuss.
I read the carryings-on at the leftie sites, and this place is very mild compared to those angry, profane mobs.
This man sounds like Maureen Dowd on estrogen.
PING!
"The article is obviousely flawed . . ."
Yeah, but he has this one dead nuts right:
"More often, it's a kind of pantomime, where the name of the game is to cheer the good guy and boo the bad guy every time he creeps on stage."
Sometimes we need to remember that our enemies, including the author of this piece of tripe, despise conservatism and would despise it no matter how it is presented. What they would prefer is that it not be presented at all.
It is a testament to the power and vigor of FR that it inspires such attacks. Antfarm for zealots? Hardly. If it were that, Ivor would have ignored it.
We have more readers is all that counts
"...is this really how we FReepers want to be perceived..."
You can't make friends with moonbats, and why should we care what a cult of european socialists think of us?
This screed is nothing more than the cockroaches looking into the ant farm and envying our productivity. Let them eat dung.
Guy didn't do much homework. He cites a thread with 73 posts. That's a still born around here.
Ant farm, indeed. Some of us were apparently 'off the reservation' if their little picnic got messed up!
If you're catching hell, it is usually because you are effective.
Just a suggestion… Tossell, remove that beam from your eye. It might improve your vision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.