Posted on 03/04/2007 5:53:01 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu
Members of the Cherokee Nation of native Americans have voted to revoke tribal citizenship for descendants of black slaves the Cherokees once owned. A total of 76.6% voted to amend the tribal constitution to limit citizenship to "blood" tribe members.
Supporters said only the Cherokees had the right to determine tribal members. Opponents said the amendment was racist and aimed at preventing those with African-American heritage from gaining tribal revenue and government funding. The Cherokee Nation has 250,000 to 270,000 members, second only to the Navajo. 'Right to vote' The list of descendants stems from the Dawes Commission, established by Congress more than 100 years ago.
It created two lists - one of "blood" Cherokees and one of black freedmen. Principal Chief Chad Smith said about 8,700 people had voted - more than the turnout for the Cherokee constitution vote of four years ago. He said: "The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote. "Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No-one else has the right to make that determination." But opponents of the amendment levelled accusations of discrimination. Tribal council member Taylor Keen said: "This is a sad chapter in Cherokee history... this is not my Cherokee Nation. My Cherokee Nation is one that honours all parts of her past."
Saturday's vote followed a ruling by the Cherokee Nation Supreme Court last year securing tribal citizenship for descendants of freedmen. Members can obtain government benefits and tribal services including housing and medical support. Slaves were held by a number of native American tribes and were freed after the Civil War in 1866.
|
Brotherhood walks, it's all about the cashish.
Regards.
OK. So why should anyone object to that?
Opponents said the amendment was racist and aimed at preventing those with African-American heritage from gaining tribal revenue and government funding.
Ah, the crux of the matter.
More Cherokees voted over this than for their constitution, according to the article.
Are the Cherokee being niggardly in their approach to tribal membershp? Are they throwing another faggot in the fires of racism?
Descendants of Cherokee slaves received a form of reparation. Reparations are terminated.
So are the libs capable of accusing the Cherokees of being racist?
It's pretty clear that the "slaves" were part of the Cherokee polity, and this is the United States, not Canada.
This ain't over ~
Guessing that the majority of Americans have some Amerindian blood--though usually in small amounts only.
The main tribe, already in Oklahoma, decided that "real" cherokees were the ones who had gotten there first, and cut the "trail of tears" Cherokees out of tribal membership. When the communal tribal lands in Oklahoma were divided up among the members (late 1800's), the trail of tears Cherokees didn't get land (all Cherokee land is now private - no "reservations" exist in Okla.) To this day the trail of tears Cherokees don't get tribal health care and other federal goodies, even if they are 100% "Indian".
(I'm going from 30 year old memory on the history, so no whining if I've got a couple things wrong here)
Indian "blood" is the ultimate get-into-Ivy-League-school-with-mediocre-grades-free card.
Why don't we just call a spade a spade? There will be no more monkey-business with tribal funds. To all hangers-on who hoped for a gravy-train: the jig is up. Anyway, these disparate factions haven't had anything to do with each other in a coon's age.
Apparently you don't understand tribal sovereignty status. The founders of the United States considered the Indian nations as another nation. This is documented by the fact that they signed treaties with them.
The US government can only sign treaties with another government. This was long before any Indian casinos were proposed.
And by the way, each tribe constructs it's own constitution.
Don't know what this is all about? Can you say CASINO REVENUE? At a casino near Fresno only the few hundred tribal members first agreeing to the casino keep the yearly, per member jackpots (Indian profit-sharing)of close to half a million each. Excluded tribal members regularly picket the place trying to join, to no avail.
A group of nameless tribal leaders adorn the casino walls. It might as well say "no new members welcome", even if you can prove blood lineage. What a sham.
The new caption on the old Indian ad could be "First they exclude me from the tribe, then they throw french fries, wrapper and all at me in the street. Man have I been trashed."
Or "You want something to cry about? We'll give you something to cry about. We'll call it sovereignity, but it will really mean, most of you are left out in the cold."
I thought slavery was a White Man thing, and that 'Native' Americans had a PC culture... (ha).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.