Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious bones of Jesus, Joseph and Mary
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | February 24, 2007 | By Tim Butcher in Jerusalem

Posted on 02/24/2007 9:14:06 AM PST by aculeus

In a scene worthy of a Dan Brown novel, archaeologists a quarter of a century ago unearthed a burial chamber near Jerusalem.

Inside they found ossuaries, or boxes of bones, marked with the names of Jesus, Joseph and Mary.

Then one of the ossuaries went missing. The human remains inside were destroyed before any DNA testing could be carried out.

While Middle East academics doubt that the relics belong to the Holy Family, the issue is about to be exposed to a blaze of publicity with the publication next week of a book.

Entitled The Jesus Tomb and co-written by Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pellegrino, the book promises the inside story of "what may very well be the greatest archaeological find of all time".

Some of the ossuaries will be at the book launch in New York, released by the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The story began in March 1980 when Yosef Gat, an archaeologist employed by the IAA, surveyed a burial chamber on the south-eastern approaches of Jerusalem.

The area was being developed into the latest suburb of the city, East Talpiot, and bulldozers had uncovered an archaeological site.

Mr Gat found a standard-looking Jewish tomb dating from the era of King Herod, the Jewish king known for his ambitious building works and for his murder of infants at the time of the birth of Jesus.

After crawling into the necropolis Mr Gat found the main chamber had been silted up with soil and debris, with six "kokhim", coffin shaped spaces leading off the main chamber where human remains were housed.

According to Jewish rites, bodies would be left for a year or so to decompose in the "kokhim" before relatives came back to gather the bones and store them in ossuaries.

Mr Gat found 10 ossuaries bearing inscriptions. Some were in ancient Greek and some were in Hebrew.

One inscription said "Jesus, son of Joseph", another said "Mara", a common form of Mary, and another said "Yose", a common form of Joseph.

The authors were unavailable for comment yesterday but it is understood they base their claim that the burial chamber contained the remains of the Holy Family on their own study carried out inside the structure.

The chamber has been closed for years because a building was constructed on top of it but the authors got permission to break through an apartment block floor.

They claim to have found human material on which they performed DNA testing in a New York laboratory.

"Tests prove the names are genetically of the same family and statistically, there is a one in 10 million chance this is a family other than the Holy Family," the pre-publication publicity for the book said.

However, according to strict Christian teaching, Jesus ascended to heaven, so there would be no bones left behind.

Mr Gat died several years ago. His boss, Prof Amos Kloner said that while the names together had "a certain power" they are standard.

"At least three other ossuaries have been found inscribed with the name Jesus and countless others with Joseph and Mary," he said.

The 10 ossuaries were taken initially to the Rockefeller Archaeological Museum outside the Old City of Jerusalem. Nine were catalogued and stored but the tenth was left outside in a courtyard.

That ossuary has subsequently gone missing.

The story went cold until two accounts of the discovery were published by Israeli academics in the mid 1990s. Prof Kloner wrote the second one in the IAA's in-house magazine Atiquot in 1996.

It sparked publicity, most notably a BBC programme shown that Easter produced by Ray Bruce called The Body In Question. However, Prof Kloner said there was no way the tomb housed the Holy Family.

"It is just not possible that a family who came from Galilee, as the New Testament tells us of Joseph and Mary, would be buried over several generations in Jerusalem."

However, in this Dan Brown era, we can't help wondering.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: biblicalarcheology; bravosierra; christianity; epigraphyandlanguage; flimflam; godsgravesandglyphs; godsgravesglyphs; jamescameron; jerusalem; jesustomb; letshavejerusalem; religion; simchajacobovici; talpiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-279 next last
To: newsie

LMFAO!


61 posted on 02/24/2007 11:38:07 AM PST by My Favorite Headache (Liberals : So open-minded....their brains have all fallen out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Indeed MHG, indeed!


62 posted on 02/24/2007 11:44:43 AM PST by proudmilitarymrs (It's not immigration, it's an invasion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: happydogx2
"I doubt that there is anything "theological" about Mary being taken away, bones and all, to heaven."

Whether there is or not, my Bible tells me not to be a "stumbling block" to other Christians. Since I don't believe it matters to our salvation one way or the other whether one believes Mary's body ascended to Heaven, it's no big deal to me. Who am I to judge another's servant? My best friend is a 7th Day Adventist. While 7th dayers are strictly biblical in their faith they believe in keeping the Old Testament dietary habits and the Saturday Sabbath. Although I believe Jesus' new covenant releases us from this part of the law, I don't argue with him over it. In fact, when we are together I try not to eat pork or shellfish so as not to be a stumbling block to him. He is devout child of Christ and it would be a sin for me to do anything which could interfere with that.

63 posted on 02/24/2007 11:51:01 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"Assumption happened to at least a couple of OT folks"

Enoch and Elijah.

64 posted on 02/24/2007 11:54:04 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: California74
Likewise, Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven.

I never heard that one before.

_________________________________________

It's a teaching that we Catholics take very seriously.

65 posted on 02/24/2007 11:55:22 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blu
It's a Catholic thing. We're taught that Mary ascended into heaven.

-------------------------------------------

Assumed not ascended.

66 posted on 02/24/2007 11:58:36 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

As we move to the return of Jesus, we will hear more of this crap.


67 posted on 02/24/2007 11:59:11 AM PST by bmwcyle (It is time to stop the left at the wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudmilitarymrs
Yes Jesus ascended through his own power as God. Mary was assumed, not the same thing.

Then how could Mary be your Co-Redemptrix? Especially if she did not die for your sins?

Anyway, I'm a Calvinistic Baptist. I only spoke up because some of you pretend non-Catholics don't exist and you like to hide how modern some of your 'ancient' doctrines are. You're the last ones to ever mention how modern, for instance, the infallibility of the pope is. Then you all just pretend that these beliefs were uniform throughout the ancient church. And it's not true. Of course, this is part of why the pope deemed himself infallible, namely, so he could pronounce such flaky doctrines as official dogma.
68 posted on 02/24/2007 12:05:03 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

You can always tell when Easter is approaching, because some writer finds the body of Jesus again...


69 posted on 02/24/2007 12:07:08 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
You still have the opportunity to convert to the one, true religion, and correct your misapprehensions of Catholicism, assuming you have not died yet when you read this.

[clang]
Bring out your dead!
CUSTOMER:
Here's one.
CART MASTER:
Ninepence.
DEAD PERSON:
I'm not dead!
CART MASTER:
What?
CUSTOMER:
Nothing. Here's your ninepence.
DEAD PERSON:
I'm not dead!
CART MASTER:
'Ere. He says he's not dead!
CUSTOMER:
Yes, he is.
DEAD PERSON:
I'm not!
CART MASTER:
He isn't?
CUSTOMER:
Well, he will be soon. He's very ill.
DEAD PERSON:
I'm getting better!

70 posted on 02/24/2007 12:08:13 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
It's a teaching that we Catholics take very seriously.

Yeah, we can tell by how many sincere Catholics you've had to correct on this doctrine.

I don't worry over Catholics much as long as the central focus of their faith is centered around our Lord, Jesus Christ, and His redemption of His flock. I do speak up when a bunch of ancient or modern myths are raised up which rob Him of His glory as Savior.
71 posted on 02/24/2007 12:11:42 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Yeah, we can tell by how many sincere Catholics you've had to correct on this doctrine.

I don't worry over Catholics much as long as the central focus of their faith is centered around our Lord, Jesus Christ, and His redemption of His flock. I do speak up when a bunch of ancient or modern myths are raised up which rob Him of His glory as Savior.

_____________________________________________________________

Number 1: Don't confuse semantic error with belief.

Number 2: How about you don't worry about us at all, we're doing just fine.

72 posted on 02/24/2007 12:14:59 PM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"Tests prove the names are genetically of the same family and statistically, there is a one in 10 million chance this is a family other than the Holy Family," the pre-publication publicity for the book said.

ROFLMOL...oh really? And whose DNA did they COMPARE this DNA to in order to arrive at a 10 Million to one certainty? This isn't even as rational as Gore science.

73 posted on 02/24/2007 12:19:56 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Number 1: Don't confuse semantic error with belief.

I'm not. But you are. Demonstrably so, given some of the responses on this thread.
74 posted on 02/24/2007 12:21:13 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

OK,that's it! I call a Catholic jihad. Since we are the only ones who "believe" in Mary, I call her as ours. As such, we are the only ones allowed to talk about her!!! (you get the sarcasm, right?)


75 posted on 02/24/2007 12:27:56 PM PST by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Please see my post #54...I have already been corrected, and Sister Perpetuella has been made aware of my transgression.


76 posted on 02/24/2007 12:29:58 PM PST by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: perez24

'Gee...that sure was a convenient find. "

Prolly one of those miracle thingies.


77 posted on 02/24/2007 12:37:21 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

The RC compiled the scriptures, didn't they?


78 posted on 02/24/2007 12:38:44 PM PST by MK11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blu

I saw. Did not mean to sound snarky.


79 posted on 02/24/2007 12:39:11 PM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Mr Gat died several years ago. His boss, Prof Amos Kloner...


Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the same Professor Amos Kloner who tried to pass off as genuine the ossuary supposedly containing the bones of one "James, brother of Jesus"?

IIRC, the inscription on that box was found to be a modern day forgery.
80 posted on 02/24/2007 12:40:05 PM PST by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson