Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious bones of Jesus, Joseph and Mary
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | February 24, 2007 | By Tim Butcher in Jerusalem

Posted on 02/24/2007 9:14:06 AM PST by aculeus

In a scene worthy of a Dan Brown novel, archaeologists a quarter of a century ago unearthed a burial chamber near Jerusalem.

Inside they found ossuaries, or boxes of bones, marked with the names of Jesus, Joseph and Mary.

Then one of the ossuaries went missing. The human remains inside were destroyed before any DNA testing could be carried out.

While Middle East academics doubt that the relics belong to the Holy Family, the issue is about to be exposed to a blaze of publicity with the publication next week of a book.

Entitled The Jesus Tomb and co-written by Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pellegrino, the book promises the inside story of "what may very well be the greatest archaeological find of all time".

Some of the ossuaries will be at the book launch in New York, released by the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The story began in March 1980 when Yosef Gat, an archaeologist employed by the IAA, surveyed a burial chamber on the south-eastern approaches of Jerusalem.

The area was being developed into the latest suburb of the city, East Talpiot, and bulldozers had uncovered an archaeological site.

Mr Gat found a standard-looking Jewish tomb dating from the era of King Herod, the Jewish king known for his ambitious building works and for his murder of infants at the time of the birth of Jesus.

After crawling into the necropolis Mr Gat found the main chamber had been silted up with soil and debris, with six "kokhim", coffin shaped spaces leading off the main chamber where human remains were housed.

According to Jewish rites, bodies would be left for a year or so to decompose in the "kokhim" before relatives came back to gather the bones and store them in ossuaries.

Mr Gat found 10 ossuaries bearing inscriptions. Some were in ancient Greek and some were in Hebrew.

One inscription said "Jesus, son of Joseph", another said "Mara", a common form of Mary, and another said "Yose", a common form of Joseph.

The authors were unavailable for comment yesterday but it is understood they base their claim that the burial chamber contained the remains of the Holy Family on their own study carried out inside the structure.

The chamber has been closed for years because a building was constructed on top of it but the authors got permission to break through an apartment block floor.

They claim to have found human material on which they performed DNA testing in a New York laboratory.

"Tests prove the names are genetically of the same family and statistically, there is a one in 10 million chance this is a family other than the Holy Family," the pre-publication publicity for the book said.

However, according to strict Christian teaching, Jesus ascended to heaven, so there would be no bones left behind.

Mr Gat died several years ago. His boss, Prof Amos Kloner said that while the names together had "a certain power" they are standard.

"At least three other ossuaries have been found inscribed with the name Jesus and countless others with Joseph and Mary," he said.

The 10 ossuaries were taken initially to the Rockefeller Archaeological Museum outside the Old City of Jerusalem. Nine were catalogued and stored but the tenth was left outside in a courtyard.

That ossuary has subsequently gone missing.

The story went cold until two accounts of the discovery were published by Israeli academics in the mid 1990s. Prof Kloner wrote the second one in the IAA's in-house magazine Atiquot in 1996.

It sparked publicity, most notably a BBC programme shown that Easter produced by Ray Bruce called The Body In Question. However, Prof Kloner said there was no way the tomb housed the Holy Family.

"It is just not possible that a family who came from Galilee, as the New Testament tells us of Joseph and Mary, would be buried over several generations in Jerusalem."

However, in this Dan Brown era, we can't help wondering.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: biblicalarcheology; bravosierra; christianity; epigraphyandlanguage; flimflam; godsgravesandglyphs; godsgravesglyphs; jamescameron; jerusalem; jesustomb; letshavejerusalem; religion; simchajacobovici; talpiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-279 next last
To: cowdog77
Well then, I guess I'd better rethink my entire life to fit your view.

Have a good life, see you on the other side.

121 posted on 02/24/2007 4:58:13 PM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77
Well, dog..It's what we Catholics are taught.

"The Assumption - Catholics believe that at her death, Mary was taken into heaven body and soul".

sw

122 posted on 02/24/2007 5:06:37 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife) (Duncan Hunter 08 "Will you join us"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Actually, I think Dr. Tabor is a doctor of theology and a believer himself.

He doesn't tread on the theological issues, but his work, heavily annotated, fills in some of the 'lost' or overlooked issues of Jesus' early years and his family relations.

But if you aren't interested in books that might reinforce faith with buttressing information from contemporary religious and historical writings and archeological findings, it's OK by me.


123 posted on 02/24/2007 5:09:56 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Amos Kloner is the main pusher of the James Ossuary and his conclusions should be taken with a grain of salt. It was found to be of modern design and execution.


Assuming the ossuaries are real, they most likely are the remains of a well to do family of Christans who named their family after the family of Jesus. They may have also changed their names to honor the family of Jesus.

The one in ten million statement is utter poppycock. There is no data on which to build any statistic.


124 posted on 02/24/2007 5:36:47 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perez24

Every year, surely around Easter and Christmas, the MSM finds new stories disputing the claims of the Bible, Jesus and the truth of Christianity. Then books and movies are made; usually on USA or ABC to keep us awake at night. I can't wait till Jesus does come again and wakes up the NYTimes editorial staff!


125 posted on 02/24/2007 5:48:09 PM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I agree.

For one thing, the bones of Jesus Christ would show rather obvious signs of crucifixion. I don't see any mention of that.

Conveniently, this discovery was made "a quarter of a century ago." Also conveniently, the bones disappeared. Sounds like a lame excuse for another church conspiracy theory.

I'll stick with the disciples of Christ. 11 of 12 died gruesomely claiming Christ rose. They were there and they should know.

I don't think or anyone will die for this tale.


126 posted on 02/24/2007 5:56:13 PM PST by July4th64 (?????????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Touche! You are correct. His real name was Y'shua. Jesus is the Latinized name of Iesu, the Greek version.


127 posted on 02/24/2007 6:05:37 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: philetus

Can't be! They are my gardeners and maid and they are good!


128 posted on 02/24/2007 6:17:10 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Here we go: some fuel for the fire, courtesy of director James Cameron, on "Titanic" fame:

http://time-blog.com/middle_east/"

February 23, 2007 6:55 
Jesus: Tales from the Crypt
Posted by Tim McGirk | Comments (318) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This 

Brace yourself. James Cameron, the man who brought you 'The 
Titanic' is back with another blockbuster. This time, the 
ship he's sinking is Christianity.

In a new documentary, Producer Cameron and his director, 
Simcha Jacobovici, make the starting claim that Jesus 
wasn't resurrected --the cornerstone of Christian faith-- 
and that his burial cave was discovered near Jerusalem. 
And, get this, Jesus sired a son with Mary Magdelene.

No, it's not a re-make of "The Da Vinci Codes'. It's 
supposed to be true.

Let's go back 27 years, when Israeli construction workers 
were gouging out the foundations for a new building in the 
industrial park in the Talpiyot, a Jerusalem suburb. of 
Jerusalem. The earth gave way, revealing a 2,000 year old 
cave with 10 stone caskets. Archologists were summoned, and 
the stone caskets carted away for examination. It took 20 
years for experts to decipher the names on the ten tombs. 
They were: Jesua, son of Joseph, Mary, Mary, Mathew, Jofa 
and Judah, son of Jesua.

Israel's prominent archeologist Professor Amos Kloner 
didn't associate the crypt with the New Testament Jesus. 
His father, after all, was a humble carpenter who couldn't 
afford a luxury crypt for his family. And all were common 
Jewish names.

There was also this little inconvenience that a few miles 
away, in the old city of Jerusalem, Christians for 
centuries had been worshipping the empty tomb of Christ at 
the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Christ's resurrection, 
after all, is the main foundation of the faith, proof that 
a boy born to a carpenter's wife in a manger is the Son of 
God.

But film-makers Cameron and Jacobovici claim to have 
amassed evidence through DNA tests, archeological evidence 
and Biblical studies, that the 10 coffins belong to Jesus 
and his family.

Ever the showman, (Why does this remind me of the 
impresario in another movie,"King Kong", whose hubris 
blinds him to the dangers of an angry and very large ape?) 
Cameron is holding a New York press conference on Monday at 
which he will reveal three coffins, supposedly those of 
Jesus of Nazareth, his mother Mary and Mary Magdalene. News 
about the film, which will be shown soon on Discovery 
Channel, Britain's Channel 4, Canada's Vision, and Israel's 
Channel 8, has been a hot blog topic in the Middle East 
(check out a personal favorite: Israelity Bites) Here in 
the Holy Land, Biblical Archeology is a dangerous 
profession. This 90-minute documentary is bound to outrage 
Christians and stir up a titanic debate between believers 
and skeptics. Stay tuned. 

--Tim McGirk/Jerusalem

Enjoy
TS

129 posted on 02/24/2007 6:52:09 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Math Teachers Know ALL the Angles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
and stir up a titanic debate between believers and skeptics.

heh-heh, heh-heh, "titanic debate", oh those clever writers at Time!

130 posted on 02/24/2007 6:53:02 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Math Teachers Know ALL the Angles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

Not a myth.


131 posted on 02/24/2007 7:12:21 PM PST by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
That sound you hear is the Church Fathers laughing at your ignorance.

Many other things you won't find in Scripture:

The word Bible.

The word Trinity.

The word Incarnation.

Plus this gem:

"But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written." John 21:25

Any idea what copy of Sacred Scripture Jesus used?

132 posted on 02/24/2007 8:06:13 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
As was the doctrine of Mary as a co-redemptrix from sin by your last pope.

You're on a roll, gomer. No such thing occurred during Pope John Paul II's Papacy.

By the way, Einstein, co-redemptrix is Latin, the English translation being the woman with the Redeemer. In no way does said description of the Blessed Mother elevate her to a level equal to Jesus. However, the facts never get in the way of fools like you with slightly below room temp IQs ignorantly flapping their gums.

133 posted on 02/24/2007 8:10:42 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
Whether there is or not, my Bible tells me not to be a "stumbling block" to other Christians. Since I don't believe it matters to our salvation one way or the other whether one believes Mary's body ascended to Heaven, it's no big deal to me. Who am I to judge another's servant? My best friend is a 7th Day Adventist. While 7th dayers are strictly biblical in their faith they believe in keeping the Old Testament dietary habits and the Saturday Sabbath. Although I believe Jesus' new covenant releases us from this part of the law, I don't argue with him over it. In fact, when we are together I try not to eat pork or shellfish so as not to be a stumbling block to him. He is devout child of Christ and it would be a sin for me to do anything which could interfere with that.

We need more of this attitude around.

(Romans 14, eh?)

Cheers!

134 posted on 02/24/2007 8:13:26 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: happydogx2

I doubt you know anything about the theology contained in Munificentissimus Deus.


135 posted on 02/24/2007 8:16:19 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

Thats what we need to do , discredit this "research" on a scientific basis not on a religious one. Do we have any DNA expersts here of FR? This story sound slik ejunk science at best.


136 posted on 02/24/2007 8:17:22 PM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Can you provide any Scriptural reference describing the deaths of all the Apostles?


137 posted on 02/24/2007 8:18:46 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77
Where in Sacred Scripture can you find the word Bible?
138 posted on 02/24/2007 8:20:54 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I'm a Calvinistic Baptist.

Why bother arguing then? Your salvation or lack thereof has been pre-determined.

139 posted on 02/24/2007 8:21:53 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77
I'd have to see it in the Bible, chapter and verse. Otherwise it's not "official".

It's not in scripture that Jesus ever took a dump. Does that mean he didn't ever take one?

140 posted on 02/24/2007 8:25:32 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson