Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious bones of Jesus, Joseph and Mary
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | February 24, 2007 | By Tim Butcher in Jerusalem

Posted on 02/24/2007 9:14:06 AM PST by aculeus

In a scene worthy of a Dan Brown novel, archaeologists a quarter of a century ago unearthed a burial chamber near Jerusalem.

Inside they found ossuaries, or boxes of bones, marked with the names of Jesus, Joseph and Mary.

Then one of the ossuaries went missing. The human remains inside were destroyed before any DNA testing could be carried out.

While Middle East academics doubt that the relics belong to the Holy Family, the issue is about to be exposed to a blaze of publicity with the publication next week of a book.

Entitled The Jesus Tomb and co-written by Simcha Jacobovici and Charles Pellegrino, the book promises the inside story of "what may very well be the greatest archaeological find of all time".

Some of the ossuaries will be at the book launch in New York, released by the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The story began in March 1980 when Yosef Gat, an archaeologist employed by the IAA, surveyed a burial chamber on the south-eastern approaches of Jerusalem.

The area was being developed into the latest suburb of the city, East Talpiot, and bulldozers had uncovered an archaeological site.

Mr Gat found a standard-looking Jewish tomb dating from the era of King Herod, the Jewish king known for his ambitious building works and for his murder of infants at the time of the birth of Jesus.

After crawling into the necropolis Mr Gat found the main chamber had been silted up with soil and debris, with six "kokhim", coffin shaped spaces leading off the main chamber where human remains were housed.

According to Jewish rites, bodies would be left for a year or so to decompose in the "kokhim" before relatives came back to gather the bones and store them in ossuaries.

Mr Gat found 10 ossuaries bearing inscriptions. Some were in ancient Greek and some were in Hebrew.

One inscription said "Jesus, son of Joseph", another said "Mara", a common form of Mary, and another said "Yose", a common form of Joseph.

The authors were unavailable for comment yesterday but it is understood they base their claim that the burial chamber contained the remains of the Holy Family on their own study carried out inside the structure.

The chamber has been closed for years because a building was constructed on top of it but the authors got permission to break through an apartment block floor.

They claim to have found human material on which they performed DNA testing in a New York laboratory.

"Tests prove the names are genetically of the same family and statistically, there is a one in 10 million chance this is a family other than the Holy Family," the pre-publication publicity for the book said.

However, according to strict Christian teaching, Jesus ascended to heaven, so there would be no bones left behind.

Mr Gat died several years ago. His boss, Prof Amos Kloner said that while the names together had "a certain power" they are standard.

"At least three other ossuaries have been found inscribed with the name Jesus and countless others with Joseph and Mary," he said.

The 10 ossuaries were taken initially to the Rockefeller Archaeological Museum outside the Old City of Jerusalem. Nine were catalogued and stored but the tenth was left outside in a courtyard.

That ossuary has subsequently gone missing.

The story went cold until two accounts of the discovery were published by Israeli academics in the mid 1990s. Prof Kloner wrote the second one in the IAA's in-house magazine Atiquot in 1996.

It sparked publicity, most notably a BBC programme shown that Easter produced by Ray Bruce called The Body In Question. However, Prof Kloner said there was no way the tomb housed the Holy Family.

"It is just not possible that a family who came from Galilee, as the New Testament tells us of Joseph and Mary, would be buried over several generations in Jerusalem."

However, in this Dan Brown era, we can't help wondering.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: biblicalarcheology; bravosierra; christianity; epigraphyandlanguage; flimflam; godsgravesandglyphs; godsgravesglyphs; jamescameron; jerusalem; jesustomb; letshavejerusalem; religion; simchajacobovici; talpiot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-279 next last
To: wtc911

Likewise, Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven.
__________________________________
I never heard that one before.
__________________________________
Me either, I'd have to see it in the Bible, chapter and verse. Otherwise it's not "official".


101 posted on 02/24/2007 3:34:56 PM PST by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

LOL! Nice pic, too bad you posted the pic of the Catholic mafia! The jihad is run by us nice Catholic moms!


102 posted on 02/24/2007 3:35:36 PM PST by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77

"Keep in mind that if Scripture does not record an event, it does not follow that the event did not happen. Scripture does not record Paul or Peter's journey to Rome, and they were both martyred there while the Bible was still being written. With this in mind, it would be unscriptural and unreasonable to conclude that the dogma of Mary's Assumption is false because it is not mentioned explicitly in Scripture."


103 posted on 02/24/2007 3:38:58 PM PST by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: blu

Thanks!


104 posted on 02/24/2007 3:46:30 PM PST by proudmilitarymrs (It's not immigration, it's an invasion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


105 posted on 02/24/2007 3:46:43 PM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77
Me either, I'd have to see it in the Bible, chapter and verse. Otherwise it's not "official".

The Federalist Papers are "official" either, but I find much comfort in their writings.

Just some thoughts.

106 posted on 02/24/2007 3:47:22 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Math Teachers Know ALL the Angles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Darn. I never expected The Catholic Jihad.

NOBODY expects the Catholic Jihad!

"The Inquisition! Let's begin!
The Inquisition! Look out sin!
We're on a mission . . .

"We're on a mission from God"

. . .

107 posted on 02/24/2007 3:49:21 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Math Teachers Know ALL the Angles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: NYer
uh-oh.

Look what they did now. They call out the big guns.

108 posted on 02/24/2007 3:50:26 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Math Teachers Know ALL the Angles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
That ossuary has subsequently gone missing.

If I ever find the individual who changed the term "disappeared" to "went missing", I will whip their hands with a ruler!!!

109 posted on 02/24/2007 3:50:32 PM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
Were there any other women by name other than one Martha?

Yes ... Mary from Magdala.

"Miriam" was a very popular name back then, as was Joseph.

110 posted on 02/24/2007 3:53:07 PM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

hmmm...how do they know what Jesus' family's DNA consisted of....has to be a guess and shame on them@!


111 posted on 02/24/2007 4:05:36 PM PST by Right in Wisconsin (Have a Happy Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

That's what I mean, Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary Magdelene, Mary the wife of Cleopas and Martha - were any other women named in the gospels? Mary was definitely popular but probably didn't count for 3/4 of the women.

Mrs VS


112 posted on 02/24/2007 4:23:58 PM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Right in Wisconsin
Don't toil with the Devil, he works seven days a week. Look to Jesus and smile. God Bless you.
113 posted on 02/24/2007 4:30:33 PM PST by logcabinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Mysterious bones of Jesus, Joseph and Mary

I'd purely love to see them try to prove that. I mean, that they're the Jesus, Joseph and Mary. Good luck.

114 posted on 02/24/2007 4:36:16 PM PST by RichInOC (Jesus is coming back soon...and boy, is He ticked off. [I'm trying to keep it clean.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I believe that was the bones of Jesus,Jose,& Maria Perez, who slipped over the border.


115 posted on 02/24/2007 4:39:09 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Bump for later read.


116 posted on 02/24/2007 4:40:36 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu
The jihad is run by us nice Catholic moms!

Woe is us! We innocent Protestants really never expected something as sneaky as the Catholic Mom Jihad.
117 posted on 02/24/2007 4:43:05 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Is it completely hypocritical of me to post a comment on a subject matter that I consider to be an absolute waste of bandwidth?


118 posted on 02/24/2007 4:44:42 PM PST by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Show me the proof, Infidel!


119 posted on 02/24/2007 4:51:47 PM PST by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Oh, please....

BTW, bones of Jesus Christ?

Not aware at all, that He decided to leave any behind.


120 posted on 02/24/2007 4:53:23 PM PST by unspun (What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson