Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll Shows Giuliani Love Across the Country (Rudy Beats All Dem Candidates by at Least 5%)
Gothamist.com ^ | 2.22.07 | Mary Ann Chastain

Posted on 02/22/2007 7:09:41 AM PST by meg88

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani got good and bad news from the Quinnipiac Poll.

The good news: He beats Senator Hillary Clinton, 48% to her 43% in a national poll conducted last week.

The bad news: It's still over 18 months to go until Election 2008.

Quinnipiac drilled down to the red, blue and purple state level: Giuliani beats Clinton 55-38 in states that voted Republican in the 2004 election.

Interestingly, he ties her 46-46 in the blue states, while it's close in "purple states" (where the "margin in 2004 was less than 7%) - Giuliani has 44% while Clinton has 45%. Here are some more matchups:

- Senator John McCain edges Clinton, 46 - 44 percent

- Clinton tops former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney 49 - 37 percent;

- Giuliani beats Illinois Sen. Barack Obama 47 - 40 percent;

- Giuliani tops 2004 vice presidential candidate John Edwards 48 - 40 percent;

- McCain ties Obama 43 - 43 percent;

- McCain gets 43 percent to Edward's 42 percent, a tie;

- Obama tops Romney 49 - 29 percent;

- Edwards beats Romney 48 - 32 percent.

Giuliani would win a Republican primary with 40% of Republican primary voters supporting him over McCain who would get just 18%, while Clinton would win a primary with 38% over Obama (23%). Furthermore, the Quinnipiac poll shows that Giuliani has the highest favorability rating of all candidates, with 57%, which Clinton has 46%, McCain has 51% and Obama has 44% (notably, 40% don't know enough about Obama to form an opinion.

Yesterday, Mayor Giuliani was campaigning in South Carolina. On the news last night, WNBC's Melissa Russo noted something unusual: While the crowds were very friendly to Giuliani, even reporters (from Southern papers) asked Giuliani to take pictures with him.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: duncanhunter; giuliani
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 661-677 next last
To: paulat
(Alas!...what Jeb could have been....hope he will be down the road....)

No ... more ... Bushes...

501 posted on 02/22/2007 7:23:13 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You aren't going to be able to find an 100% Conservative, acceptable to not only everyone here on FR, but appealing to the majority of the American populace

Agreed about the 100% part. However there is no need--and no possibility--of finding someone acceptable here to *everyone* here on FR--we have the entire political spectrum here, some overtly and others by stealth and with mutually exclusive objectives. That is NOT a reference to you, only an observation of fact.

That said, educating people and spreading the truth about every aspect of true Conservatism -- Constitutional Originalism -- for now is is Job Number One. Lather, rinse and repeat. Lather, rinse and repeat.
502 posted on 02/22/2007 7:23:44 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Whiner, I don't think so.

I can post to anyone I want , what's it to ya.
503 posted on 02/22/2007 7:24:50 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I guess the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 was passed without Clinton's signature.

The ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_assault_weapons_ban

Interesting...I never knew Bush wanted to extend the ban.

504 posted on 02/22/2007 7:25:36 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Quit worrying about the true conservatives backing Rudy in the general. I'm one, and I'd back him to the hilt. Now, I may seem like the exception, but let me tell you, these people who say "I'll never vote for Rudy" now get to watch Hillary campaign for the next 21 months. Trust me, that will concentrate the mind...


505 posted on 02/22/2007 7:27:56 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: paulat
The ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision.

And exactly what does that have to do with the fact that it would not have become law if Clinton hadn't signed it, thereby negating your claim that the President doesn't have anything to do with the 2nd Amendment?

Interesting...I never knew Bush wanted to extend the ban.

Why are you even raising that point when you said the prez has no impact on the 2nd Amendment?

506 posted on 02/22/2007 7:29:42 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Joe Brower

Your understanding of the Constitution is off, EV. Joe Brower has it right.


507 posted on 02/22/2007 7:30:32 PM PST by FreeReign (Still waiting for the best conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
They are!

I have NOT spammed any thread; neither have I baited anyone.

Nor have I have NOT posted a single vulgarity, obscenity, nor accused anyone of being "a socialist", "a communist", being "off their meds", "drunk", being "over caffinated", not a Conservative, a "traitor", "immoral", nor any of the many, varied, and other things that have been hurled at me. If I had, you would have suspended me; at the least.

508 posted on 02/22/2007 7:30:33 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: paulat
So, for me, that leaves Romney and Giuliani.

Romney

509 posted on 02/22/2007 7:32:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Rudy Giuliani is the answer; if the question is: "Who can most effectively destroy the GOP?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Once again, please show how Rudy could atract pro-life PA Dems.

Realistically, most people don't vote for Pres based on one issue.

510 posted on 02/22/2007 7:32:51 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Your understanding of the Constitution is off, EV. Joe Brower has it right.

All I did was post the words of the document. Argue with the Preamble and the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.

511 posted on 02/22/2007 7:34:31 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Rudy Giuliani is the answer; if the question is: "Who can most effectively destroy the GOP?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
What exactly is "TRUE CONSERVATISM" and who defines it?

And WHAT has THAT to do with the topic of this thread?

512 posted on 02/22/2007 7:34:56 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Realistically, most people don't vote for Pres based on one issue.

I guess you aren't familiar with a lot of pro-life voters.

513 posted on 02/22/2007 7:35:36 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt; EternalVigilance; dirtboy
Regardless of the two, you do more harm than good/

To which cause; liberalism?, socialism?, fascism?, pacifism?, totalitarianism?, anarchism?, government enforced atheism?, abortionism?, feminism?, homosexualism?, racism?, wacko environmentalism?, judicial activism?, which one of your causes?
514 posted on 02/22/2007 7:35:37 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You are making my point. Presidents don't control states' rights. It doesn't matter.


515 posted on 02/22/2007 7:36:00 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: karnage

I think it would work, sorta, in a converse sense. Giuliani could be Hunter's wingman. He could have 8 years to re-evaluate his positions on some important socon issues.


516 posted on 02/22/2007 7:36:08 PM PST by Kevmo (The first labor of Huntercles: Defeating the 3-headed RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I guess you aren't familiar with a lot of pro-life voters.

I AM familiar with candidates who are not electable...Duncan Hunter comes to mind....

517 posted on 02/22/2007 7:37:17 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
First, the Constitution already protects life.

It protects life against government.

518 posted on 02/22/2007 7:37:30 PM PST by FreeReign (Still waiting for the best conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I guess he didn't embarass you then...

Thats why I am angry, you caricatures cost us credibility as conservatives. Without credibility, we lose. Dirtboy, I don't think you're a fifth columnist, merely their useful tool.

519 posted on 02/22/2007 7:38:14 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: meg88

the fact that Rudy only beats Hillary by 5% is frightening. Hillary should be being beaten by 15-20% at least. but since Kerry got so many votes in '04 my faith in the American people was shattered. lots of things are wrong, very wrong.


520 posted on 02/22/2007 7:39:09 PM PST by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 661-677 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson