Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Hot Air (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^ | February 13, 2007 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 02/12/2007 9:39:29 PM PST by jazusamo

The political left's favorite argument is that there is no argument. Their current crusade is to turn "global warming" into one of those things that supposedly no honest and decent person can disagree about, as they have already done with "diversity" and "open space."

The name of "science" is invoked by the left today, as it has been for more than two centuries. After all, Karl Marx's ideology was called "scientific socialism" in the 19th century. In the 18th century, Condorcet analogized his blueprint for a better society to engineering, and social engineering has been the agenda ever since.

Not all the advocates of "global warming" are on the left, of course. Crusades are not just for crusaders. There are always hangers-on who can turn the true believers' crusades into votes or money or at least notoriety.

Whether the globe really is warming is a question about facts -- and about where those facts are measured: on land, in the air or under the sea. There is no question that there is a "greenhouse" effect. Otherwise, half the planet would freeze every night when there is no sunlight falling on it.

There is also no question that the earth can warm or cool. It has done both at one time or another for thousands of years, even before there were SUVs. If there had never been any global warming before, we wouldn't be able to enjoy Yosemite Valley today for it was once buried under thousands of feet of ice.

Back in the 1970s, the environmental hysteria was about the dangers of a new ice age. This hysteria was spread by many of the same individuals and groups who are promoting today's hysteria about global warming.

It is not just the sky that is falling. Government money is falling on those who seek grants to study global warming and produce "solutions" for it. But that money is not as likely to fall on those skeptics in the scientific community who refuse to join the stampede.

Yes, Virginia, there are skeptics about global warming among scientists who study weather and climate. There are arguments both ways -- which is why so many in politics and in the media are so busy selling the notion that there is no argument.

If you heard both arguments, you might not be so willing to go along with those who are prepared to ruin the economy, sacrificing jobs and the national standard of living on the altar to the latest in an unending series of crusades, conducted by politicians and other people seeking to tell everyone else how to live.

What about all those scientists mentioned, cited or quoted by global warming crusaders?

There are all kinds of scientists, from chemists to nuclear physicists to people who study insects, volcanoes, and endocrine glands -- none of whom is an expert on weather or climate, but all of whom can be listed as scientists, to impress people who don't scrutinize the list any further. That ploy has already been used.

Then there are genuine scientific experts on weather and climate. The National Academy of Sciences came out with a report on global warming back in 2001 with a very distinguished list of such experts listed. The problem is that not one of those very distinguished scientists actually wrote the report -- or even saw it before it was published.

One of those very distinguished climate scientists -- Richard S. Lindzen of MIT -- publicly repudiated the conclusions of that report, even though his name had been among those used as window dressing on the report. But the media may not have told you that.

In short, there has been a full court press to convince the public that "everybody knows" that a catastrophic global warming looms over us, that human beings are the cause of it, and that the only solution is to turn more money and power over to the government to stop us from our dangerous ways of living.

Among the climate experts who are not part of that "everybody" are not only Professor Lindzen but also Fred Singer and Dennis Avery, whose book "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years," punctures the hot air balloon of the global warming crusaders. So does the book "Shattered Consensus," edited by Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, which contains essays by others who are not part of "everybody."

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: convenientlie; globalwarming; sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2007 9:39:30 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger; Alia; Amalie; AmeriBrit; American Quilter; arthurus; awelliott; Bahbah; BraveMan; ...
*PING*
Thomas Sowell

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Recent columns
All The ‘News‘?
The Larger Tragedy
The “Greed“ Fallacy

Please FReepmail me to be added to the New Thomas Sowell ping list.

2 posted on 02/12/2007 9:40:58 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou; Letaka; RockinRight; Hoodlum91; Chanticleer; motormouth

I love this guy ping


3 posted on 02/12/2007 9:47:45 PM PST by Shimmer128 (joy is not in things, it is in us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

One of the most brilliant commentators living.


4 posted on 02/12/2007 9:47:51 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
An associate of mine, he is a graduate of MIT with a degree in meteorology, recently attended a conference of meteorologists. The vast concenses of this group is there is a minor warming of the earth since the last two hundred years that is not out of the norm in relationship to warming and cooling periods of the last few thousand years.
They also concluded that the CO2 driven global warming hypothesis is not valid.

The New York Times had nothing to say about this conference.
5 posted on 02/12/2007 10:02:33 PM PST by cpdiii (Oil Field Trash and proud of it, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
The New York Times had nothing to say about this conference.

Not surprising, it doesn't fit the agenda of the media or the left.

6 posted on 02/12/2007 10:09:46 PM PST by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo


Good column


7 posted on 02/12/2007 10:19:52 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii; potlatch

The New York Times and the UN have a vested interest in the PC arguments.

If they get their political goals done, they will move on.



8 posted on 02/12/2007 10:21:45 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

The New York Times had nothing to say about this conference.


Then it never happened!


9 posted on 02/12/2007 10:28:36 PM PST by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Dr Sow ell is onr smart fellow. I only wish he would get on the tube mure often.


10 posted on 02/12/2007 10:29:05 PM PST by neverhillorat (IF THE RATS WIN, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

What articles has this group written?


11 posted on 02/12/2007 10:54:51 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* ?I love you guys?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
The vast concenses of this group is there is a minor warming of the earth since the last two hundred years that is not out of the norm in relationship to warming and cooling periods of the last few thousand years. They also concluded that the CO2 driven global warming hypothesis is not valid.

Do you have any references to this?

12 posted on 02/12/2007 11:06:43 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
There is no question that there is a "greenhouse" effect. Otherwise, half the planet would freeze every night when there is no sunlight falling on it.

LOL!! What a simple and elegant argument.

13 posted on 02/12/2007 11:27:57 PM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ping me, please.


14 posted on 02/12/2007 11:32:34 PM PST by Islander7 ("Show me an honest politician and I will show you a case of mistaken identity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks - will read in my lunchbreak!


15 posted on 02/13/2007 12:18:56 AM PST by vimto (Life is not a dry run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randog

"There is no question that there is a "greenhouse" effect. Otherwise, half the planet would freeze every night when there is no sunlight falling on it."

Actully, night time cooling is clear evidence of how little greenhouse effectthere is from just "greenhoue gases". Under normal, clear sky conditions, the earth and atmosphere start cooling as soon as the sun goes down and continue to cool until sunrise. Cloud cover has a dramatic effect on this cooling, as do high humidity levels.


16 posted on 02/13/2007 2:47:57 AM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; Mrs. Don-o; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on graphic for full GW rundown


17 posted on 02/13/2007 3:35:42 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Thomas Sowell is one of our leading sharpshooters.

His book

"The Quest For Cosmic Justice"

is one of the leading works on separating the actions of the left from the agenda of the left.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell
18 posted on 02/13/2007 4:46:18 AM PST by PzGr43
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Is it my imagination or, in the past half year or so, has there been some chinks showing up in Global Warming's armor?
It seems like more and more of the public is coming to its senses and finally realizing that it is just a big socialist HOAX.


19 posted on 02/13/2007 4:57:53 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Great column! Thanks for the ping!


20 posted on 02/13/2007 5:32:19 AM PST by RebelBanker (May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson