Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When some claim that President Bush shouldn't have started this war, state the following:
2/7/7 | unknown

Posted on 02/07/2007 5:41:35 PM PST by do the dhue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: do the dhue

BUMP!


61 posted on 02/07/2007 10:04:42 PM PST by skr (I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
in international law, an act of war is the equivalent of a declaration of war.

North Korea invaded South Korea...not the US.

62 posted on 02/07/2007 10:05:24 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

I wonder if Hitler ever wished he could take that back? The Japanese attacked us without telling him. As a result the Russians were able to bring reinforcements from the Far East to reinforce troops defending Moscow. Without them, Moscow--and Leningrad --probably would have falled to the Germans.


63 posted on 02/07/2007 10:08:43 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
You've got a good discussion going on this thread.Thank you for initiating it.

Too many people insist on looking at the war in Iraq as if it were the only war we've ever fought.

64 posted on 02/07/2007 10:09:24 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
I concur with that.

I don't believe any US President started Vietnam. I think, for some reason, Kennedy seems to get the most credit though.

I think what it is saying is that the liberal will say, Iraq never attacked us. Neither did, Vietnam or Korea. And we lost more people in Vietnam and Korea both. A lot more.
65 posted on 02/07/2007 10:14:01 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Thanks, but you may have to keep the fire burning on your own. I gittin ready to get some rest.
66 posted on 02/07/2007 10:15:54 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

Well, do the dhue, heck yeah! BTTT!


67 posted on 02/07/2007 10:19:06 PM PST by Chena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender; do the dhue
Their sacrifice served a noble cause - but that's a lot of American dead and I for one won't hear anyone say it isn't

1. He isn't downplaying, he's pointing out that the hysteria is unjustified.

2. You won't hear anyone saying it's not a lot of Americans? Tough.

The roughly 4 year total of men lost in Iraq is....

... still smaller than the death toll from the battle of the Kasserine Pass in WWII--6 days, 6,000 men.

... still smaller than the single day total from the Battle of Antietam in the Civil War--3,654 men.

...still less than twice the number lost by the Union at Cold Harbor.

...1/136 of the number of men we lost in WWII.

...is about 3,600 less than the number of men lost on Guadalcanal.

...far less than half the number we lost at Iwo Jima.

...less than a third the number of men lost at Okinawa.

...is less than the number of sailors alone who were killed at Okinawa in Kamikaze attacks.

Were all of those lost in Iraq valuable? Was their sacrifice meaningful? Are their families devastated? Yes to all those questions, but the same can be said of every American fighting man we've lost. Therefore, 3,000 is not a lot of Americans lost in a noble cause by any measure.

I will be called callous for saying that, but it's the truth, and it's time for Americans to man up and get this job done, or those 3,000 lives were poured down a hole.

68 posted on 02/07/2007 10:20:43 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("Logic" is as meaningless to a liberal as "desert" is to a fish.--Freeper IronJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

"I'd say a Declaration of War is comparable to an attack."

Iran took over our Embassy in 1979 - an Act of War!
Iran provided the financial support to Hezbollah in the 1983 attack on our Marines in Lebanon - and Act of War!
Iran is providing the IEDs to kill our Soldiers in Iraq - an Act of War!

RE: Lebanon..." The Marine sentries at the gate were operating under their rules of engagement, which made it very difficult to respond quickly to the truck."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_barracks_bombing

It all gets back to the Rules of Engagement.
We are at War with Iran because they have declared War against us and have prosecuted War against us since 1979
until the present time.

It is a Cowardly Congress that refuses to recognize that War exists and declare War against Iran.
This is not the same as being unilateral. It is setting the US on a War basis and recognizing the situation as it has existed since 1979.

This is the starting point for the resolution of conflict which means Peace. Only when War is successfully waged can the Peace process begin. We must do so forthwith with Iran.
Then the muslims can pronounce salam (or whatever).


69 posted on 02/07/2007 10:22:47 PM PST by Prost1 (Fair and Unbiased as always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue
Thanks, but you may have to keep the fire burning on your own. I gittin ready to get some rest.

Have a good night.

70 posted on 02/07/2007 10:23:28 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

HEAR HEAR !!


71 posted on 02/07/2007 10:27:05 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

bump


72 posted on 02/07/2007 10:28:44 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
the hysteria is unjustified.

Being concerned about 3000 deaths isn't "hysteria," . 3000 died on 9-11, and the c oncern about those deaths isn't "hysteria."

73 posted on 02/07/2007 10:29:51 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I will be called callous for saying that, but it's the truth, and it's time for Americans to man up and get this job done, or those 3,000 lives were poured down a hole.

HEAR HEAR !! again
74 posted on 02/07/2007 10:29:52 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

I'll give you a heck yeah, but there are far more compelling reasons for why we went into Iraq than those you state.


75 posted on 02/07/2007 10:30:01 PM PST by Wolfstar ("A nation that hates its Horatios is already in grave danger of losing its soul." Dr. Jack Wheeler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

BTW:

Here is my understanding of Antietam (and all this in about four hours not four years):

More men were killed or wounded at Antietam on September 17, 1862, than on any other single day of the Civil War. Federal losses were 12,410, Confederate losses 10,700. Although neither side gained a decisive victory, Lee's failure to carry the war effort effectively into the North caused Great Britain to postpone recognition of the Confederate government. The battle also gave President Abraham Lincoln the opportunity to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, which, on January 1, 1863, declared free all slaves in States still in rebellion against the United States. Now the war had a dual purpose: to preserve the Union and end slavery.

http://www.civilwarhome.com/antietamdescription.htm

More data

http://www.nps.gov/anti

http://www.nps.gov/archive/anti/home.htm






76 posted on 02/07/2007 10:35:22 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I wished I did, but I didn't write this. I did post it.

I do agree that that are better reasons to go to Iraq, but I think the point here is these are good reason to really think about how 'bad' this war is going.


77 posted on 02/07/2007 10:38:47 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

gnight!


78 posted on 02/07/2007 10:40:06 PM PST by do the dhue (DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I'm sure that this will seem callous:
Many of the men who died in the battles you mentioned were drafted.

It's a different case, with the men and women who are fighting in Iraq. They opted to be in the military.

79 posted on 02/07/2007 10:41:26 PM PST by syriacus (30,000 Americans died, in 30 months, to release South Korea from Kim Il-sung's tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

I have no quarrel with the info and, in fact, thank you for posting it. My comment about better reasons should not be taken as criticism. Sorry if it came across that way.


80 posted on 02/07/2007 10:47:27 PM PST by Wolfstar ("A nation that hates its Horatios is already in grave danger of losing its soul." Dr. Jack Wheeler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson