Skip to comments.
The Beginning of the the End of Hillary Clinton's Campaign for President
http://www.defeatconquer.com ^
| 1/29/2007
| John Estrada
Posted on 01/29/2007 11:05:46 PM PST by johnestrada
Beginning of the End of Hillary's Campaign for President
TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: badactress; badevilwoman; clintonterm3; election; goingsenile; hillary; hilliary; politicalhack; politics; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: Allegra
She's already taking on water, what with her produced "Let's Chat" BS. Her "Bad Men" gaffe was just another piece of the hull peeling off.
She just "ain't it". They know this.
21
posted on
01/29/2007 11:55:45 PM PST
by
IslandJeff
(that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
To: Allegra
....until the campain managers silenced her.Yup, they had good reason for that. Bill is a lying, philandering ego-maniac. But he has charm and charisma.
Hillary couldn't charm a snake with a plate full of fat hamsters.
Bill is the best used car salesman the world has ever seen.
Hill couldn't sell a sizzling steak to a starving Texan.
Bill has a sense of what people are feeling and how to connect with it.
Hill has no idea what it's like to be a human being.
Bill is a policy wonk who can rattle off reams of info on a subject.
Hill can barely splutter out her canned platitudes without screwing them up.
Bill tells a joke and his enemies choke because...it was kind of funny.
Hill tells a joke and her friends laugh...because they don't want to embarrass her.
Bill has a spouse that makes people think he had a reason.
Hill has a spouse that makes people think she's beyond reason.
22
posted on
01/30/2007 12:11:08 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Ego chatter endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
To: ChiMark
the average guy doesn't care if we get our face slapped by the Islamofacists. In fact they probably think we should be punished.
The average person doesn't think! The average person is not real bright either. My aunt was a school teacher for most of her adult life and she always said that most people are not very bright. In other words they don't think for themselves.
23
posted on
01/30/2007 12:22:32 AM PST
by
Bittersweetmd
(God is Great and greatly to be praised.)
To: johnestrada
Both Her Husband Bill Clinton, and She herself has called for President Bush to be out of Iraq by Jan 2008, this is Because They both know She would completely Blow it if She had to make Wartime decisions. She has no experience, or the Guts to do what it takes, and Bill has already Proved that He can't do it either. and as soon as Sandy Berger takes His Polygraph, and is convicted in the Biggest Coverup scandal this Country has seen since Watergate.... well....Even the Stupid Democrats can see She is a "Political" Dead Hag Walking.
I don't think the Democrats want Her in there screwing this up so bad it costs them the House and Senate.
This is why it is so sweet! She and all the other Liberals
used this war to trash Bush and say how he is screwing it up, yet they never had a Plan on what they would do..and Now they have the Power, and we are going to call their Bluff. Maybe She can ge a Female War council of Jane Fonda, Susan Sarandon, and Media Benjamine..What a Joke!
These Clowns couldn't fix this no matter what they do it will blow up in their faces.
24
posted on
01/30/2007 12:36:52 AM PST
by
LtKerst
(Lt Kerst)
To: IslandJeff
The Dems are, by nature, attuned political creatures. Some focus group somewhere will alert them that Hil has weaknesses among middle America. I think she is trying to address precisely what I have been harping on, - her lack of the 'likability' factor. I don't think she will be successful. A leopard cannot change its spots and I believe she will not be able to cover up her lack of any sense of humor,pettiness, as well as her other deficiencies no matter how much coaching she gets and practicing she does.
To: TigersEye
26
posted on
01/30/2007 1:15:23 AM PST
by
Socratic
(A family is more than a matter of genetics.)
To: Northern Alliance
What that Loathesome Shrew does have going for her is a lot of time and money, as well as every newspaper and network news bureau in the nation.
Just watch. She'll likely cook up some sort of personal adversity, then bravely overcome it "for the children and for the American people".
/ retch
27
posted on
01/30/2007 1:23:58 AM PST
by
IslandJeff
(that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
To: Jack Black
"Women voters gave us Prohibition but have been largely silent since then. It's overdue for the weaker sex to screw up America again. Hillary is the vehicle, and it may well happen."
And a remarkable feat it was for women voters to bring about Prohibition, considering the Eighteenth Amendment was ratified January 16, 1919, taking effect one year later on January 16, 1920,... more than six months before the Nineteenth Amendment granting equal Suffrage was ratified. How women voters brought about Prohibition, before they could even vote, remains one of the truly great historical mysteries to this day ... considering their absence!
To: Jack Black
I'm telling you...SHE'S THE ANTICHRIST!
29
posted on
01/30/2007 1:30:25 AM PST
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
To: backtothestreets
LOL
"PW" since time began...
30
posted on
01/30/2007 1:32:01 AM PST
by
IslandJeff
(that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
To: Jack Black
I believe that a majority of women voters will reject Hillary Clinton.
To: backtothestreets
Prohibition was created by an amendment, so no one "voted" for it save the Congress and the state legislatures. However, women were very active in the temperance movement that lead to Prohibition. On the other hand many men lead the charge too.
I think I'll have a drink.
To: johnestrada
I appreciate your comments, but see Hillary Clinton's campaign gaining momentum because their is no one challenging her for turf.
At this moment, the Democrats, particularly Hillary, enjoy support the Republicans scorn, but do not try to meld into their own strategy. It's as though the Republicans are either blind to it, or purposely ignore it, and it is so simple.
The Democrats have successfully made the Internet their own personal real estate to raise vast campaign funds and of equal importance, give voters places they feel, justly or not, that they are interacting directly with the candidates.
The formula is quite simple. Once voters feel someone is listening to them, they are more inclined to donate, even small amounts. Those small individual donations translate into votes later. They also add up in shear numbers and attract the larger donors with the big bucks. Any candidate that can lay out a solid list of individual contributors has votes in the bank. Big contributors like that since it is votes that eventually win campaigns.
To: backtothestreets; Jack Black; SoCal Pubbie
How women voters brought about Prohibition, before they could even vote, remains one of the truly great historical mysteries to this day ... considering their absence!They voted with their... you know...
I don't think Prohibition was a bad thing at all. It was certainly Constitutional and ratified properly, unlike the 16th Amendment.
Prohibition was actually ENFORCED, unlike a lot of other parts of the Constitution.
Perhaps someone can tell me how my 2nd Amendment RIGHTS end at the New York city limits and why anyone would push for a gun grabber from New York as a GOP candidate!
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
"It was certainly Constitutional and ratified properly, unlike the 16th Amendment."
I'd given the 14th, 16th and 17th Amendment all considerable thought. I'd propose another amendment to settle all.
Section V of the Constitution is amended as follows: Each proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America after December 15, 1791, must be put to the citizens of the individual states for approval of ratification, and each state may only ratify upon a plurality of popular votes. States will have one year to comply upon ratification of this amendment.
To: Proud_USA_Republican
MSM acting as her cheerleader. I dunno, seems the MSM is the one who made Obama out of thin air...kinda like the Michael Jackson of Circus Dhim candidates, and now she's ridiculed as being a "Dukakis in a Dress".
Maybe she'll go independent....
36
posted on
01/30/2007 2:24:51 AM PST
by
4woodenboats
("Show me what 100 hours brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman")
To: backtothestreets
It is also interesting that the 7th Amendment is completely ignored...
To: LtKerst
Not just the Clintons - no Democrat wants anything to actually do with Iraq. So far, their plan has been very simple; criticize whatever the Bush Administration does, and keep referring to their own secret plan without revealing what it is.
That's why they confirm the new Commander in Iraq, who wrote the surge plan, while setting a new record for meaningless blather in trying to write a tough-sounding non-binding resolution in order to embarrass the President.
38
posted on
01/30/2007 2:25:38 AM PST
by
Bernard
(Immigration should be rare, safe and legal.)
To: TigersEye
A friend of mine who had frequent personal contact with b clinton said that he's a genuinely likable guy.
Unlike hillary who most resembled Medusa in private.
39
posted on
01/30/2007 2:42:52 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(I'm a RINO because I'm too conservative to be a real Republican.)
To: johnestrada
40
posted on
01/30/2007 3:02:51 AM PST
by
rogernz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson