Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers upgrade ethanol production
UPI ^ | 01/29/07

Posted on 01/29/2007 6:05:08 AM PST by nypokerface

PITTSBURGH, Jan. 29 (UPI) -- U.S. engineers have found a way to improve ethanol production, thereby helping ensure biofuels become a significant part of the U.S. energy supply.

Carnegie Mellon University chemical engineers say they used advanced process design methods combined with mathematical optimization techniques to reduce the operating costs of corn-based bio-ethanol plants by more than 60 percent.

The technology involves redesigning the distillation process by using a multicolumn system and a network for energy recovery that ultimately reduces the consumption of steam, a major energy component in the production of corn-based ethanol.

"This new design reduces the manufacturing cost for producing ethanol by 11 percent, from $1.61 a gallon to $1.43 a gallon,'' said Professor Ignacio Grossmann, who completed the research with graduate students Ramkumar Karuppiah, Andreas Peschel and Mariano Martin. "This research also is an important step in making the production of ethanol more energy efficient and economical.''

Although corn-based ethanol once was questionable energy resource, 46 percent of U.S.-produced gasoline now contains ethanol. The federal government has mandated 5 percent of the nation's gasoline supply -- roughly 7.5 billion gallons -- much contain some ethanol by 2012.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: dubiousmath; energy; ethanol; renewableenergy; renewenergy; science; sciene
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2007 6:05:10 AM PST by nypokerface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Our public schools ensure that all Children get the new math so they can't do math.

So what makes you think the gasoline engine can figure out the "mathematical optimization techniques?"


2 posted on 01/29/2007 6:07:52 AM PST by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

Meanwhile peasants in Mexico are starting to go hungry because of the rising coat of corn. How long before the third world crowd starts railing against rich yanquis for growing food to burn as fuel.

Funny how the "alternative fuels" crowd hasn't come up with a substitute for the tortilla.


3 posted on 01/29/2007 6:08:26 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

"to reduce the operating costs of corn-based bio-ethanol plants by more than 60 percent."




Somehow I doubt that.


4 posted on 01/29/2007 6:09:28 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface



http://www.nysun.com/article/46979

By all accounts, the ethanol industry is overheated, and the bubble is poised to burst.
But rather than let the market correct itself, the industry is seeking a bailout from the firm of Obama, Harkin, Dorgan, Lugar & Biden.
The senators have introduced a bill that would double the amount of renewable fuel that the federal government requires petroleum companies to mix with gasoline.
They are rushing the bill out for an industry that, according to a trade group, the Renewable Fuels Association, has at least 65 new ethanol distilleries under construction at the moment and will soon be producing more than 11 billion gallons of ethanol a year.

This glut is pushing prices down on the supply side, while high prices on corn — the main commodity needed for ethanol production — are pinching the industry's bottom line.
So the only thing that could prevent an ethanol slump is an instant and unlikely surge in demand.
No one in his or her right mind would ordinarily mix that much ethanol with gasoline.
So Messrs. Obama, Harkin, Dorgan, Lugar & Biden are trying to get the Congress to wave its magic wand.


5 posted on 01/29/2007 6:19:41 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sully777; Fierce Allegiance; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; ...

Ethanol Cost Reduction PING!....


6 posted on 01/29/2007 6:19:54 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Meanwhile, American peasants are beginning to go hungry due to the high cost of gas and other energy resources.


7 posted on 01/29/2007 6:20:13 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

ping


8 posted on 01/29/2007 6:21:27 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Well we will see. A bunch of "University researchers" claimed once upon a time to have perfected cold fusion. Turned out they were wrong.
9 posted on 01/29/2007 6:24:13 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( If they say "speaking truth to power,"-they haven't had a l thought since the Beatles broke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buck61
High cost of gas? At $4.00 a gallon it would consume LESS of your budget then food does of the average citizen of any other nation in the world. Current price per gallon is $2.17 a gallon. If you are going hungry because of the high price of gas you either need to get a DIFFERENT car or you are a moron.
10 posted on 01/29/2007 6:26:34 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( If they say "speaking truth to power,"-they haven't had a l thought since the Beatles broke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Think about what you are saying. That we should not do a certain thing that will reduce petroleum usage for transportation because there are poor people in the world? Look at it this way, we're driving down the cost of petroleum for the rest of the world.

I'm not a big fan of corn based ethanol as a long term solution because it will never be competitive against other ethanol feedstocks. But it is something we have right now.

Let Mexico figure out how to feed its peasants. They've been buying our corn because it's cheaper. They will have to start growing their own, and these things take time. Markets change.

11 posted on 01/29/2007 6:27:07 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

I'm not "saying it"-

I'm just phrasing the inevitable 3rd world rhetoric that will rise as we consume more and more corn (plus use more and more more water and land) for gasoline.

Plus mexico has already figured out how to feed its peasants. Send them here.


12 posted on 01/29/2007 6:31:55 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

13 posted on 01/29/2007 6:32:18 AM PST by Red Badger (Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The left will always complain about the Yankees.

If we were 100% pc the left would demand a breathing tax. Oh wait, they already are with the carbon footprint bs.


14 posted on 01/29/2007 6:32:58 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

don't like MTBE --> hello ethanol

that's just how things work


15 posted on 01/29/2007 6:33:37 AM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

There's a lot of hay fields that will be planted in corn come May.


16 posted on 01/29/2007 6:34:28 AM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)
Our public schools ensure that all Children get the new math so they can't do math. So what makes you think the gasoline engine can figure out the "mathematical optimization techniques?"

All I know is, I can't figure out your comment....

17 posted on 01/29/2007 6:34:53 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

It may work in theory. But the practical application may not work out as well.


18 posted on 01/29/2007 6:37:42 AM PST by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface
Ethanol may have a fuel content, but it acts more like a diluant.

As more Ethanol is blended in, the Miles Per Gallon drops in direct proportion.

It's all an illusion to pretend we are Doing Something. I got 30MPG Highway all the time, so predictably I could use the odometer as a fuel gage. With 10% EtOH I now get 27, just as consistenly.

So in Dollars Per Mile, I am paying more assuming a constant per gallon cost.

Yes, an engine will run on 100% ethanol. It hates it but it will run.

19 posted on 01/29/2007 6:40:37 AM PST by Gorzaloon (Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon
Yes, an engine will run on 100% ethanol. It hates it but it will run.

What are you talking about? Perhaps you mean running a high percentage of alcohol in a gasoline engine, but alcohol is a perfectly fine internal combustion engine fuel. It has its drawbacks as a transportation fuel, such as its low vapor pressure. But it runs great in a properly designed ic engine. Lots of race cars run methanol.

20 posted on 01/29/2007 6:57:08 AM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson