Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney: Accused Marine lieutenant is really a 'hero' [Conclusion of Lt Phan hearing]
The North County Times ^ | January 28, 2007 | Mark Walker

Posted on 01/28/2007 4:04:33 PM PST by RedRover

CAMP PENDLETON ---- A Marine officer accused of assaulting three Iraqi civilians last spring is really a hero, a hearing officer was told Sunday.

"You have a young officer sitting at our end of the table who was trying to protect his Marines," defense attorney Lt. Col. Matthew Cord said at the conclusion of a hearing that will determine if 2nd Lt. Nathan Phan is ordered to court-martial. "He deserves a medal and they're trying to put a knife in his back."

Cord's comments came as the hearing for the 26-year-old Phan ended with the presiding officer, Lt. Col. William Pigott, saying he plans to recommend two investigations stemming from testimony that emerged during Phan's four-day Article 32 hearing.

Phan, a Kilo Company platoon commander from the 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, is charged with assaulting the three Iraqis in March and April during efforts to obtain information about insurgent activity in and around the Anbar province village of Hamdania in western Iraq. He also is accused of making a false official statement in connection with one of the alleged victims.

Pigott said he will ask Lt. Gen. James N. Mattis to order a formal inquiry into possible perjury and false official statements by three enlisted Marines who were in Iraq with Phan and were called as witnesses by his attorneys.

The enlisted men claimed that sworn statements generated by Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents contained falsehoods in passages that say the men saw Phan commit an assault. Each later provided Phan's attorneys with affidavits that swear the government statements were inaccurate.

One of the enlisted men, Lance Cpl. Andrew Kraus, was ordered to stop testifying on Saturday, read his legal rights and informed he may be charged with perjury and making a false statement.

As part of the probe into the statement issue, Pigott said he also will ask Mattis to examine how the statements were prepared by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, a civilian-staffed branch of the Department of the Navy that serves as its law enforcement agency. Mattis is the convening authority over the Phan case as the commanding general of Marine Corps Forces Central Command and Camp Pendleton's I Marine Expeditionary Force.

The other probe Pigott said he will recommend is an inquiry into whether any of the attorneys engaged in improper contact with any of the witnesses in violation of the rules that govern attorney conduct.

Phan's lead attorney, David Sheldon, said after Sunday's court session that he believes the investigations are necessary.

"Someone is lying and we have to find out who," said Sheldon, who also said he believes that Pigott will recommend that Phan, a Sacramento-area native, be ordered to court-martial.

A heated exchange between Pigott, the top legal officer at the Marine Corps base in Yuma, Ariz., and Sheldon capped the conclusion of the hearing. Sheldon attempted to ask Pigott to reconsider whether evidence the Marine Corps says is classified should be made part of the official record.

Pigott responded by saying the hearing was officially closed. When Sheldon attempted to interject, Pigott screamed that the hearing was closed and that the attorney should sit down and stay quiet.

As Phan looked on with a worried expression, Sheldon muttered the ruling was "bullshit," prompting Pigott to say, "Did you just threaten me?" and "Don't swear at me."

Those moments nearly overshadowed the comment on the evidence that Lt. Col. Cord made on behalf of Phan during concluding remarks.

Cord maintained that the prosecution conducted by Maj. Donald Plowman and Capt. Nicholas Gannon was relying on a "murderer and inveterate liar," a reference to Sgt. Lawrence Hutchins III, a member of Phan's platoon who is charged with concocting a plot that led to the April 26 slaying of a retired Iraqi policeman in Hamdania.

Phan has no connection to the slaying, but the investigation of that incident led to the charges brought against him that could result in a more than 20-year prison sentence and dishonorable discharge if he is ordered to trial, convicted and sentenced to the maximum punishment.

Four Marines and a Navy medical corpsman charged in the slaying have pleaded guilty in negotiated deals with prosecutors and are serving jail terms ranging from 12 to 21 months. Hutchins, the squad leader, and two corporals face trials later this year for their alleged roles in the killing.

Cord pointed out that Hutchins was never called to testify and that two of the prosecution witnesses against Phan were men who have pleaded guilty in the homicide case and had motivation to testify the way the government wanted.

He also contended there was no evidence that Phan was in the room when one of the alleged assault victims was beaten. The two other alleged victims are unavailable, he said. One is dead and the other refuses to cooperate with U.S. authorities.

Addressing the false official statement charge, Cord said that uncontested radio logs from Phan's command center in Iraq show he reported having a detainee in custody. That charge alleges Phan reported the detainee had been released when prosecutors charge that man was actually still in custody.

Phan, who did not testify during the hearing, acknowledged in a written statement introducing during the hearing that he had placed an unloaded pistol near the lips of one detainee, an act that Cord contended does not satisfy the required elements of the assault charge.

The prosecution told Pigott it had met its burden in establishing there was sufficient probable cause to believe Phan had committed unlawful acts and should be ordered to trial.

Prosecutor Plowman pointed to a written statement from Hutchins in which the sergeant wrote that Phan "was the brains and I was the brawn" and that the lieutenant either directly participated in or had knowledge of the three assaults.

"The bottom line is Lt. Phan was not allowed to use physical force or threats against detainees," Plowman said.

The failure of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service to tape its witness interviews and suspect interrogations in Iraq as a matter of policy is insufficient cause to not believe its agents, Plowman said.

That issue has been at the center of Phan's defense throughout the hearing and that taping policy is now under review by agency officials at its headquarters in Washington.

Sheldon said statements made by Pigott on Saturday and Sunday that he believed the government agents were truthful was improper.

"I've never before seen an investigative officer comment on what he believes is the truthfulness of a witness during a hearing," the Washington attorney and U.S. Navy veteran said. "It's unprecedented."

Pigott will make a written recommendation to Mattis sometime next month. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice that governs prosecutions of service members, the general has wide latitude in deciding whether to order Phan to trial, dismiss the case or results or take some form of an administrative action.

Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com. Comment at nctimes.com.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: haditha; hamdania; ncis; phan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: lilycicero
I sent out a plea already and got nowhere. Not non-media, but new media can apply. I offered anyone a blogspot but got no takers.

The info about the center and the scheduled hearings, by the way, is at the official USMC site Iraq Investigations. Nothing is scheduled yet in the Haditha case.

21 posted on 01/28/2007 5:26:51 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
2 things:

1. "Naval Criminal Investigative Service, a civilian-staffed branch of the Department of the Navy that serves as its law enforcement agency."

Whoa, I did not know that. It explains so much.

2."Four Marines and a Navy medical corpsman charged in the slaying have pleaded guilty in negotiated deals with prosecutors and are serving jail terms ranging from 12 to 21 months."

For whatever reason, I was unaware that the sentences were that short, basically time served. Here's your choices: Hang or spend the rest of your life in Leavenworth or 2. Plead guilty to a false charge trumped up by military hating civilian activists and get out in short order with a dishonorable.

Am I off base here?

22 posted on 01/28/2007 5:28:18 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
True, but thats not how our system works.

You are right, but at the end of the prosecutions case, a Defendant is allowed to submit his own evidence. If the evidence submitted by the proseci=ution is fabricated, but it cannot be attacked by the defence as in this case, the Defence has no alternative but to lead its own evidence.

Af course the burden to prove guilt is still on the prosecution, but a dishonest prosecution often cannot be revealed from pat dishonest evidence of the prosecution. Defendants often must get that themselves, to introduce the doubt which will prevent the burden of proof needed to be discharged by the prosecution. Defendants can call their own evidence, to attack the evidence of the prosecutors, and in this case, given the resources, that should be fairly easy.

23 posted on 01/28/2007 5:28:25 PM PST by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Actually you are, a bit. I think the guys who copped actually get a general after serving their time, and not a dishonorable.


24 posted on 01/28/2007 5:29:43 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

In the 8 ring then. Better for them to say "Yeah, yeah, whatever" than spend the rest of their lives in the brig.


25 posted on 01/28/2007 5:34:43 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Pigott responded by saying the hearing was officially closed. When Sheldon attempted to interject, Pigott screamed that the hearing was closed and that the attorney should sit down and stay quiet.

Who IS this arrogant p.o.s. Pigott?
It sure sounds to me like the little mouse isn't going to get that officer scalp he wants, so he's spitting like a delirious child.

Anyway, add this story to the archive of what happens when you put scumbag Democrat lawyers in charge of a war. And my respect for the Commander in Chief continues to diminish.

26 posted on 01/28/2007 5:36:39 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Yeah. Sucks, huh?


27 posted on 01/28/2007 5:36:42 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
defense attorney Lt. Col. Matthew Cord

Glad to see that this young Marine officer's fate is not entirely in the hands of a civilian defense attorney.

28 posted on 01/28/2007 5:39:59 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Am I off base here?

No, you are exactly correct. Bush has put JAG and a bunch of other scumbag liberal lawyers in charge of the war and this is what you get. Our soldiers and Marines are torn between trying to memorize their "thirteen rules of engagement" and studying the UCMJ for when they are brought up on charges they gave an Iraqi civilian a dirty look.

It's a disgrace, and my respect for the Commander-in-Chief continues to diminish.

29 posted on 01/28/2007 5:42:23 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
Am I off base here?

Here are the sentences received by the Pendleton 8 so far. Keep in mind that they were originally charged with murder, kidnapping, conspiracy, assault and housebreaking.

Petty Office 3rd Class Melson J. Bacos: 12 months
Pfc. John J. Jodka: 18 months
Lance Cpl. Tyler Jackson: 21 months
Lance Cpl. Jerry E. Shumate Jr.: 21 months

I believe all have also received general discharges and credit for six months already served in confinement.

If I were a 20-something-year-old and was offered that deal, I'd take just to end the legal ordeal. Wouldn't you?

And it seems the JAGs were none too eager to see this in court either.

30 posted on 01/28/2007 5:55:35 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Thanks for the ping. Like many I am simply following things as best as I can in the little time afforded on some days.


31 posted on 01/28/2007 6:17:45 PM PST by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Your off base because NONE of those men is going to get a dishonorable, they are getting (General under) HONORABLE discharges...for being a plea bargain down from murder....

If that dont provve there is Military coverup, I dont know what does, murderers dont get honorable discharges.


32 posted on 01/28/2007 6:20:44 PM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 2...GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

"If I were a 20-something-year-old and was offered that deal, I'd take just to end the legal ordeal. Wouldn't you?"

Especially if I were being kept in solitary and my parents couldn't afford a decent lawyer.


33 posted on 01/28/2007 6:25:49 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; AirForceBrat23; Ajnin; AlaskaErik; ...

Ping


34 posted on 01/28/2007 6:41:48 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the mo; jazusamo

Hey mo, thanks for the kind words! You were the first on the ping list so jaz and I will always regard you as our first born (well, sort of). Anyway, good to see you. Your ping is our pleasure.


35 posted on 01/28/2007 6:55:29 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: driftdiver

In the Haditha case, some families may sell their homes to come up with a hundred grand for a decent lawyer. It really just boils my blood.


37 posted on 01/28/2007 7:04:41 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: johnmark7
Once careerism sets in among the management class in a war situation, you start to get problems like this prosecution.

Best bet is to take the trial to Anbar province ~ particularly the prosecutor and his staff ~ and leave the women behind.

38 posted on 01/28/2007 7:31:13 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle; pinkpanther111; Girlene; lilycicero
I expect things are going down to slow down for awhile.

The remaining Hamdania hearings/trials are ahead. Then, when they've mopped up the blood, the Haditha hearings will start. May not be until the end of February. We'll see. The gov't didn't expect to run into a sh*t storm in the Phan case and it slowed them down.

As mentioned above, I'll be eager for Gen Mattis' decision on the Phan case. If I'm not mistaken, it will be the first Marine case to reach his desk for a decision about whether to go to a court martial.

39 posted on 01/28/2007 7:37:40 PM PST by RedRover (They are not killers. Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; pinkpanther111; Girlene

I am going to say Gen Mattis will let it walk because of what Red said. Haditha is up and that is going to stack the deck. Do they make special umbrellas for a sh*t storm? :)


40 posted on 01/28/2007 7:55:12 PM PST by lilycicero (Do the right thing Gen Mattis, sir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson