"o Additional benefits given to witnesses, like Social Security cards and reimbursements"
Whose side is the U.S. Attorney’s Office on?
To: SwinneySwitch
"Whose side is the U.S. Attorney’s Office on?"
Why the president's side, of course!
Unfortunately, in this case "the president" it happens to be the president of Mexico.
2 posted on
01/27/2007 8:38:44 AM PST by
flashbunny
(If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be plucking feathers and boiling tar.)
To: SwinneySwitch
Whoo Hoo!
Bump! Bump!
And thank you Jerome Corsi [if you are lurking] for all the work you did!
3 posted on
01/27/2007 8:38:50 AM PST by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: SwinneySwitch
Meanwhile, David Sipes and his family accumulate massive debt to pay his lawyer. Obviously, from this and other examples, the U.S. Attorney's offices in Texas are run by people who are only interested in defending the ability of illegal aliens to escape the Border Patrol.
4 posted on
01/27/2007 8:38:52 AM PST by
3AngelaD
(ic.)
To: SwinneySwitch
"But while preparing for sentencing in the 2001 case, Sipe’s attorney, Jack Lamar Wolfe, found evidence the U.S. Attorney’s Office had withheld information requested before the trial." More prosecutorial misconduct? I'm shocked, just shocked! Just how endemic is this behavior in the Department of Justice? Is this standard by any chance? Win at all costs? Jail as many people as possible to make the conviction rate look good?
5 posted on
01/27/2007 8:40:24 AM PST by
Enterprise
(Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
To: SwinneySwitch
evidence the U.S. Attorney’s Office had withheld information requested before the trial Here's another one that needs to be disbarred.
7 posted on
01/27/2007 8:50:59 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: SwinneySwitch
found evidence the U.S. Attorney’s Office had withheld information requested before the trial. So-What's new.
The AH's Office either doesn't prosecute Mexicans or uses phoney, created evidence to convict BP Agents.
8 posted on
01/27/2007 8:54:26 AM PST by
radar101
(LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
To: SwinneySwitch
"Respect for the law" and "We are a nation of law" doesn't ring at all for me anymore. These are more than overzealous prosecutors. They are thugs in suits with an agenda to enforce.
To: SwinneySwitch
evidence the U.S. Attorney’s Office had withheld information requested before the trial.
Sounds like the kind of place Mike Nifong might fit in with. He may be job hunting soon.
If the US Attorney's Office withheld information, someone should be demanding an investigation into the US Attorney's Office!
12 posted on
01/27/2007 9:09:12 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Jedi Master Pikachu; 2dogjoe; RamingtonStall; engrpat; HamiltonFan; Draco; TexasCajun; ...
BP Ping!
If you want on, or off this S. Texas/Mexico ping list, please FReepMail me.
19 posted on
01/27/2007 10:02:58 AM PST by
SwinneySwitch
(Terroristas - beyond your expectations!)
To: SwinneySwitch
21 posted on
01/27/2007 11:01:33 AM PST by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: SwinneySwitch
Whose side is the U.S. Attorney’s Office on? That's all too obvious, isn't it. Can't wait to read the excuses of the OBL Bushbots.
25 posted on
01/29/2007 9:18:29 AM PST by
citizen
(Bi-Partisan (Dims+Bush) Amnistia coming soon to a nation near you. "We don't need no stinkin' fence")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson