Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I always wondered about this.
1 posted on 01/26/2007 3:42:50 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: blam; xsmommy; Gabz; patton; neverdem; NicknamedBob; LonePalm; Argh

So we shouldn't cook food (or use easily-cleanable pots!) because we MIGHT release A LITTLE BIT of (maybe NOT EVEN TOXIC) chemicals into the food?

We're all gonna die!


2 posted on 01/26/2007 3:45:53 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

My great grandmother refused to cook in aluminium. She would use it for food storage but refused to cook in it.


3 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:14 PM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
250°C hot plate

That's a lot hotter than they are normally used.

4 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:20 PM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Wonder if the food industry's lobbyist will try to keep this as quiet as possible?


5 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:24 PM PST by Sun (Let your New Year's resolution be to vote for conservatives in the primaries! Happy 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

If this were actually dangerous, blam, I would be dead.


6 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:32 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Use iron cookware and you won't need Geritol!


7 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:47 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
When the researchers popped corn in the microwave bags, gaseous emissions contained low amounts of PFOA and high amounts of fluorotelomer alcohols. The oily coatings left inside the bags contained the chemicals as well, the team reports.

And if you eat 25 bags a day for 47 years you will have a .02% of developing colon cancer.

8 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:50 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Your frying pan can kill you. But only if your wife finds you guilty.


9 posted on 01/26/2007 3:46:57 PM PST by lowbridge ("The mainstream media IS the Democrat Party". - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

"Available to subscribers at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20031011/note17.asp)"

Is this saying that for us to find out which ones are dangerous to our health, we have to subscribe to this publication?


10 posted on 01/26/2007 3:47:55 PM PST by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

So what prompted these non-stick pans to come into existence? The banishment of LARD AND COOKING OILS!


11 posted on 01/26/2007 3:48:27 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here to have it resent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

My letter to the editor:

So we shouldn't cook food (or use easily-cleanable pots!) because we MIGHT release A LITTLE BIT of (maybe NOT EVEN TOXIC) chemicals into the food?

SO we should vent (expensive already heated or air conditioned and humidified indoors air) from the kitchen (wasting BILLIONS in heating oil, gas, and electrically generated BTU's ...

All because a COMMON chemical found worldwide is merely SUSPECTED of being linked to worldwide rates of exposure.

A practical question from this engineer:

If the chemical is found in trace amounts in humans worldwide,
and US-built coated pots ARE NOT capable of contaminating
(1) people worldwide who don't use coated American pots, and
(2) people worldwide who can't afford US pots (the vast majority)
(3) people worldwide and in the US clean their pots BETTER (yielding less food poisoning from cleaner pots that are less scarred by scraping and dirt!)

... then WHY are our US companies being forced to abandon a proven helpful chemical?

The results of this ruling are dirtier pots and MORE deaths from food poisoning, millions in development and research wasted, more millions is changing chemicals that produce a worse job of protecting the pots from scarring, billions more wasted as consumer replace torn up pots not well protected by the new chemicals. And NO GOOD.


17 posted on 01/26/2007 3:58:43 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Yeah, but it's ~my~ cookware.


18 posted on 01/26/2007 3:59:59 PM PST by DigitalVideoDude (It's amazing what you can accomplish when you don't care who gets the credit. -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I only use mine at temperatures high enough to scramble an egg. I have my trusty cast iron skillets for the hot stuff.


19 posted on 01/26/2007 4:00:15 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Bump for later reading


20 posted on 01/26/2007 4:11:59 PM PST by Kevmo (Darn, if only I had signed up 4 days earlier, I'd have a 3-digit Freeper #)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Flushing the toilet with the lid up doesn't do wonders for the surrounding area, either.


21 posted on 01/26/2007 4:16:45 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
non-stick pans are about the most useless things.
i only use my ancient cast iron pans or stainless
steel revere ware. even my cookie sheets are
those huge restaurant sized stainless steel pans.
26 posted on 01/26/2007 4:26:21 PM PST by leda (The quiet girl on the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Well, those nonstick pots release something since it can kill small domestic birds like parakeets...or so bird owners are warned, anyway.


34 posted on 01/26/2007 4:41:50 PM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The first attempts at making non-stick Teflon pans had some deadly consequences. The tetrafluoroethylene could depolymerize at high temperatures. In gaseous form it is a potent neurotoxin. The phenomenon was discovered the hard way when all the employees of a bakery using the early teflon pans died when they became overheated. Later improvement in the "end groups" reduced the probability of the depolymerizing.
40 posted on 01/26/2007 4:47:17 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

They can have my nonstick frying pan...


45 posted on 01/26/2007 4:51:04 PM PST by WV Mountain Mama (2007 resolution: learn how to rail a berm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

In the 1950s I played with mercury as a kid, in a home filled with leaded paint and asbestos tile, ate lots of fish from Lake Erie (fed by the infamous Cuyahoga River)
and breathed air from the steel mills of the "flats" of Cleveland and the carbonaceous diesel exhaust of city buses. As a teenager I pumped thousands of gallons of leaded gasoline working at a service station.

I'm not sweatin' a little teflon in my omelet, LOL


58 posted on 01/26/2007 5:03:40 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson