Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheap, safe drug kills most cancers
New Scientist ^ | 1/17/06 | Andy Coghlan

Posted on 01/17/2007 5:28:53 PM PST by LibWhacker

It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.

It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.

Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancerdrug; cancers; cheap; dca; dichloroacetate; drug; health; healthcare; kills; prescriptiondrugs; wonderdrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Blueflag

Thank you! :-)


21 posted on 01/17/2007 5:52:10 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon
Maybe we will be lucky, and cancer will go the way of many other diseases......

That would truly be wonderful. Cancer is just awful.

Advances in its treatment make me proud I work in research.
22 posted on 01/17/2007 5:53:07 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I'm sorry about your husband.


23 posted on 01/17/2007 5:53:33 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's a related article and summary by the same group of Canadian researchers cited in the journal Cancer Cell (complete article requires purchase).

A Mitochondria-K+ Channel Axis Is Suppressed in Cancer and Its Normalization Promotes Apoptosis and Inhibits Cancer Growth

Summary

The unique metabolic profile of cancer (aerobic glycolysis) might confer apoptosis resistance and be therapeutically targeted. Compared to normal cells, several human cancers have high mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and low expression of the K+ channel Kv1.5, both contributing to apoptosis resistance. Dichloroacetate (DCA) inhibits mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), shifts metabolism from glycolysis to glucose oxidation, decreases ΔΨm, increases mitochondrial H2O2, and activates Kv channels in all cancer, but not normal, cells; DCA upregulates Kv1.5 by an NFAT1-dependent mechanism. DCA induces apoptosis, decreases proliferation, and inhibits tumor growth, without apparent toxicity. Molecular inhibition of PDK2 by siRNA mimics DCA. The mitochondria-NFAT-Kv axis and PDK are important therapeutic targets in cancer; the orally available DCA is a promising selective anticancer agent.
24 posted on 01/17/2007 5:59:02 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKenrod

why should any drug company that wants to sell it need to re-prove its safety, at least at approved dosage

FDA approval, unless I am wrong, is by use.


25 posted on 01/17/2007 6:04:06 PM PST by Chickensoup (If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Reportedly the Acai berry from the Amazon kills cancer cells and is the number 1 antioxidant in the world by ten fold.


26 posted on 01/17/2007 6:06:16 PM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

You have FReepmail.


27 posted on 01/17/2007 6:06:29 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Could this be true?


28 posted on 01/17/2007 6:07:34 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Running On Empty

Marking


29 posted on 01/17/2007 6:10:47 PM PST by Running On Empty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon

Excellent. bttt


30 posted on 01/17/2007 6:18:17 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark to read later


31 posted on 01/17/2007 6:19:01 PM PST by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

bump for later read


32 posted on 01/17/2007 6:23:43 PM PST by Bender2 ("Come back with your shield, or on it." Later on, this custom declined. So did Rome. So may we...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Ping, Read Later


33 posted on 01/17/2007 6:32:19 PM PST by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
Unless the FDA fast-tracks it, it will be years before US patients see it

Yes but that's why US pharmaceuticals do lots and lots of human testing overseas.

34 posted on 01/17/2007 6:38:26 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

bttt


35 posted on 01/17/2007 7:40:25 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Nothing works for emphysema. The lungs ability to function is simply destroyed.

Forget cancer, all smokers suffer decreased lung capacity, the difference is only in degree. That's why I quit 29 years ago. Not from fear of cancer, but because I couldn't breathe.


36 posted on 01/17/2007 7:49:28 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark.


37 posted on 01/17/2007 8:31:10 PM PST by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

I think somewhere back in to cobweb section of my brain I remember the American medical industry makes $20 billion a year off cancer. Now, can they afford to have a cheap cure?
Chemo, radiation, and surgery would dwindle.


38 posted on 01/17/2007 8:39:01 PM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GoldCountryRedneck
"Unless the FDA fast-tracks it, it will be years before US patients see it..."

The FDA and it's rules are for the drug companies. They have the money for the several 100 million it takes to get their approval.

No small company can afford to get their drugs or alternatives certified by the FDA. Even so yearly we here of FDA "approved" and "certified" drugs being taken off the market because of all those who the kill and maim.

The FDA is a tool of drug companies and basically run by them.
39 posted on 01/17/2007 9:35:21 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

About a jillion things cure cancer in rats that don't do squat in humans. I think rats were created to taunt know-it-all scientists.


40 posted on 01/17/2007 9:37:20 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson