Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents Block Plans to Vaccinate Nine-year-olds against Sex Virus
news.scotsman.com ^ | 07/01/07 | Brian Brady

Posted on 01/16/2007 7:46:58 AM PST by Thywillnotmine

WORRIED parents have blocked government plans to vaccinate girls as young as nine against a sexually-transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer.

Health chiefs have abandoned proposals to offer the jab against human papilloma virus (HPV) to primary school children after parents complained that it was inappropriate for girls of such a young age.

Scotland on Sunday revealed last summer that ministers were considering offering the jab to children in a desperate attempt to stop the "epidemic" in cervical cancer. The proposals for a nationwide scheme followed successful trials of a new vaccine in Glasgow.

But ministers have now been forced to concentrate on plans for the treatment on girls of at least 12 - itself a hugely controversial move.

The government U-turn came after medical experts who make the final recommendations on the baseline defences against HPV were warned of parents' opposition. The experts also threw out proposals to vaccinate boys against HPV, despite evidence that they can transmit the virus through sexual contact.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.scotsman.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: health; hpv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2007 7:47:02 AM PST by Thywillnotmine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; neverdem


2 posted on 01/16/2007 7:47:39 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanster

dosent anyone know where their kids are in Scotland?????

HEY MOM AND DAD!!!

WAKE UP!


3 posted on 01/16/2007 7:49:42 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

My MD talked to my fourteen year old about this the other day and she was so insulted.


4 posted on 01/16/2007 7:50:40 AM PST by Chickensoup (If you don't go to the holy war, the holy war will come to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nanster
WORRIED parents have blocked government plans to vaccinate girls as young as nine against a sexually-transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer.

It's nice to read about concerned parents every now and then. Most don't seem to give a damn what happens to their kids these days.
My daughter would not be given this shot, either.

5 posted on 01/16/2007 7:51:26 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nanster

Thankfully, if you raise your daughter with Conservative Values she will not have sex until she is married.


6 posted on 01/16/2007 7:53:18 AM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Um...what's wrong with this? Most women in Western countries are exposed to HPV over the course of their lifetimes. HPV causes cervical cancer. The vaccine is most effective if given ages 9-12. How could you possibly be opposed to this? It could virtually eliminate cervical cancer.

And children are already routinely given immunizations for other sexually transmitted diseases, most notably Hepatitis B.

7 posted on 01/16/2007 7:53:36 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nanster

"The experts also threw out proposals to vaccinate boys against HPV, despite evidence that they can transmit the virus through sexual contact."

I would imagine if HPV caused mens penis' to fall off instead of just mere cervical cancer in women we'd see this trend change.

Just an observation.


8 posted on 01/16/2007 7:54:09 AM PST by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
My MD talked to my fourteen year old about this the other day and she was so insulted.

Our dentist asked my 17 year old daughter if there was any chance she could be pregnant, because he was going to give her gas instead of Novocain to fill a tooth. My daughter looked at him in shock. She said "No. I'm only 17. I'm not even married."
She couldn't believe he even had the nerve to ask her something like that. Did he think she was "some kind of liberal whore?"

9 posted on 01/16/2007 7:57:08 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Thankfully, if you raise your daughter with Conservative Values she will not have sex until she is married.

A large number of women who stay chaste until marriage get infected with HPV too -- it is the most common infection on earth, and 80% of American adult women are infected. If you decide not to permit your 9 year old to get immunized against HPV / cervical cancer, you're suggesting not only that you're confident that she will never once have sex outside of marriage, but that her future husband won't either.

That may be an ideal, but it's hard to enforce. Giving your kid a deadly cancer seems like a high price to pay.

10 posted on 01/16/2007 7:57:45 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Some people think preventing a negative outcome to some future potential act is the same as approving that future potential act. They are the same ones who encourage their children not to wear seatbelts because they should be good drivers.

OTOH, it could be the anti-vaccination crowd again.

11 posted on 01/16/2007 7:59:10 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nanster

Good grief! These parents are stting their kids up for cervical cancer! It's at this young age that the vaccine is effective and there is no guarantee that a young girl will be chaste, even with a solid conservative upbringing. And there is no guarantee that her future husband will be free of the virus, too. Is avoiding being insulted more important that not dying of cervical cancer? There is more good than harm in getting this vaccine. Any daughter of mine will get the shot.


12 posted on 01/16/2007 7:59:20 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I don't know enough about the jab itself to discuss the drug. However, I think HPV is the result of multiple sexual partners, IIRC. Therefore, those with conservative sexual values (yes, we exist) are insulted that our children would be forced by law to be administered a drug that prevents behavior-induced consequences. We would rather raise them properly than to simply innoculate them against all of their decisions.

Correct me if I'm wrong...


13 posted on 01/16/2007 7:59:41 AM PST by pgyanke (Gay marriage does to real marriage what counterfeit money does to real money. - Hemogoblin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Did he think she was "some kind of liberal whore?"

80% of American women get infected with HPV by the time they're 50 years old. Although HPV doesn't always cause cervical cancer, virtually 100% of cervical cancer cases are caused by HPV.

Are you suggesting that 80% of American women are "liberal whores?" Maybe you need to get that chip off your shoulder.

14 posted on 01/16/2007 8:00:37 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Giving your kid a deadly cancer seems like a high price to pay.

Why worry? It can be detected with a simple pap smear and can be easily treated. I'd rather she take that route than inject something into her body that can't be removed later.

15 posted on 01/16/2007 8:01:22 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

you are truly dreaming.


16 posted on 01/16/2007 8:02:49 AM PST by vin-one (REMEMBER the WTC !!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nanster

I had the same objection to the Hepatitis B vaccinne now required for school age children. I was actually told by the nurse that my son needed the vaccine because so many kids became sexually active before they were 14. My son was 12 at the time. I said " not my son". I wish I had known more about the vaccine at the time. Now I refer to it as the pedophile protection shot.


17 posted on 01/16/2007 8:03:08 AM PST by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
However, I think HPV is the result of multiple sexual partners, IIRC.

HPV is mainly (we believe) spread by sexual contact. But millions of American women who have only had one sexual partner still get infected. If you keep your daughter from getting vaccinated, you're expressing confidence not only in your daughter's future behavior, but also in her future husband's future behavior -- if he's had even one other sexual partner, she will be at a substantially increased risk of contracting HPV.

HPV is not HIV -- 80% of American adult women have HPV.

18 posted on 01/16/2007 8:04:10 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: poobear
Excuse me, but I don't recall the article saying that children couldn't get the vacination, only that the governement shouldn't mandate. It can still be given on a voluntary basis if the Scots wish to take their children to a Doctor and have it done. This is the way it should be, people should be informed and made aware this vacination is available and if they think their children should have it then they are free to have their child vacinated.

Too many people are ready to jump on the governement band wagon when it comes to forcing us to do things to our children against our will.

One thing that should be considered is this: Are we getting the real info on this virus? Does it REALLY cause 70 percent of cervical cancer, or is this just another way to sell a designer drug? What are the side effects of this vacination? Have there been test groups to see what the long term effects are?

Don't be so hasty to subject everyone else's children to something that might be dangerous to them many years down the road. As I said in my first paragraph, no one is stopping people from having their daughters vacinated, if you wish to do it, feel free.

19 posted on 01/16/2007 8:04:59 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
it is the most common infection on earth, and 80% of American adult women are infected

What? 80%? FReeper please.

20 posted on 01/16/2007 8:05:56 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson